In teaching and researching English for Law, considerable effort has been put into the fine-grained description of legal genres and accounts of associated legal literacy practices. Much of this work has been carried out in the academic context, focusing especially on genres encountered by undergraduate law students. The range of genres which must be taught in professional legal writing and drafting courses is comparatively underresearched in the applied linguistics literature. This article explores one such underresearched genre, the barrister’s opinion. The article reports the findings of a genre analysis (Bhatia, 1993; Swales, 1990), drawing on the written opinions of five Hong Kong barristers, individual interviews with the barristers, and data from background information questionnaires.The study adopts a multi-perspective approach to genre analysis, drawing on the accounts of specialist informants to explain the genre as socially situated rhetorical action. Thus, the genre is analyzed in terms of its intertextual and interdiscursive writing context, generic move structure, and lexico-grammatical textualization. It is suggested that the findings may usefully be applied to the teaching of legal writing and drafting in a variety of contexts.
Badger, R. ( 2003). Legal and general: Towards a genre analysis of newspaper law reports. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 249-263.
2.
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. ( 1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community . London: Routledge.
3.
Bazeley, P. ( 2007). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
4.
Bazerman, C. ( 1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions . In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor and Francis.
5.
Beasley, C.J. ( 1993). Language and content: The case of law. Paper presented at the 8th International Institute of Language in Education Conference "Language and Content,"Hong Kong .
6.
Bhatia, V.K. ( 1987a). Textual-mapping in British legislative writing. World Englishes, 6(1), 1-10.
7.
Bhatia, V.K. ( 1987b). Language of the Law. Language Teaching , 20, 227-234.
8.
Bhatia, V.K. ( 1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings . London: Longman.
9.
Bhatia, V.K. ( 2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Conley, J.M., & O’Barr, W.M. (1990). Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Conley, J.M., & O’Barr, W.M. (2005). Just words: Law, language and power (2nd ed.). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
13.
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. ( 1969). The language of legal documents. In D. Crystal & D. Davy (Eds.), Investigating English style (pp. 193-217). Harlow, UK: Longman.
14.
Davis, K.A. ( 1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 427-453.
15.
Devitt, A. ( 1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336-357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Enright, C. ( 1995). Studying law (5th ed.). Sydney, Australia: The Federation Press.
17.
Erickson, F. ( 1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
18.
Fairclough, N. ( 1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge , UK: Blackwell.
19.
Feak, C.B., Reinhart, S.M., & Sinsheimer, A. (2000). A preliminary analysis of law review notes. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 197-220.
20.
Grice, H.P. ( 1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
21.
Hafner, C.A. ( 2008). Designing, implementing and evaluating an online resource for professional legal communication skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney , Australia.
22.
Harris, S. ( 1997). Procedural vocabulary in law case reports. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 289-308.
23.
Holland, J.A., & Webb, J. ( 2003). Learning legal rules. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Howe, P. ( 1990). The problem of the problem question in English for academic legal purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 215-236.
25.
Hyland, K. ( 1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26.
Hyland, K. ( 2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.
27.
Iedema, R. ( 1993). Legal English: Subject specific literacy and genre theory . Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 86-122.
28.
Inns of Court School of Law. (2007). Opinion writing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
Langton, N. ( 2002). Hedging argument in legal writing. Perspectives: Working papers in English and communication, 14(1), 16-51.
30.
Leech, G.N. ( 1980). Explorations in semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31.
Lundeberg, M.A. ( 1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: Studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 407-432.
32.
Maley, Y. ( 1985). Judicial discourse: The case of the legal judgment. Beitrage zur Phonetic und Linguistik, 48, 159-173.
33.
Maley, Y. ( 1994). The language of the law. In J. Gibson (Ed.), Language and the law (pp. 11-50). Harlow , UK: Longman.
34.
Martin, J.R., Christie, F., & Rothery, J. ( 1987). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 35-45). Geelong , Australia: Centre for Studies in Literary Education, Deakin University.
35.
Mertz, E. ( 1996). Recontextualization as socialization: Text and pragmatics in the law school classroom. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 229-249). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Mertz, E. ( 2007). The language of law school: Learning to think like a lawyer. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Miller, C.R. ( 1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
38.
Neumann, R.K.J. ( 2005). Legal reasoning and legal writing (Vol. 5). New York: Aspen .
39.
Northcott, J. ( 2009). Teaching legal English: Contexts and cases. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Paré, A., & Smart, G. ( 1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology . In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 146-154). London: Taylor and Francis.
41.
QSR International. (2006). QSR NVivo (Version 7). Doncaster, Australia: QSR International. Available from http://www.qsrinternational.com
42.
Redmond, P., & Roper, C. ( 2001). Legal education and training in Hong Kong: Preliminary review. Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China: Steering Committee on the Review of Legal Education and Training in Hong Kong.
43.
Richards, K. ( 2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
Scollon, R. ( 1998). Mediated discourse as social interaction: A study of news discourse. London: Longman .
45.
Stratman, J.F. ( 2002). When law students read cases: Exploring relations between professional legal reasoning roles and problem detection. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 34(1), 57-90.
46.
Swales, J.M. ( 1982). The case of cases in academic legal purposes. IRAL, 20, 139-148.
47.
Swales, J.M. ( 1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Tessuto, G. ( 2006). Opinions of counsel: An exploratory survey of generic features. In V. K. Bhatia & M. Gotti (Eds.), Explorations in specialized genres (pp. 291-308). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
49.
Vandevelde, K.J. ( 1996). Thinking like a lawyer. Boulder, CO : Westview.
50.
Weitzman, E.A. ( 2003). Software and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 310-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Wickrama, D.U.W. ( 1982). Linguistic features of commercial law texts and their pedagogical implications. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Aston, Birmingham, UK.
