This article argues for the differentiation according to timescales of aspects of writer identity. It presents a framework for investigating the discoursal construction of writer identity that develops the categories proposed by Ivanič in two ways. First, it distinguishes aspects of writer identity according to the timescales over which they develop; second, it proposes interrelationships among the different aspects. The authors demonstrate the relevance of this framework for understanding how identity is constructed and changed through acts of writing by using it to interpret data drawn from a study of writing in adult literacy education in England.
Bakhtin, M. ( 1986). The problem of speech genres (V. McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
2.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1981). Discourse in the novel (first published in 1929). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.)Austin : University of Texas Press. pp. 259-422
3.
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. ( 1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community . London: Routledge.
4.
Barton, D., Hamilton, M. , & Ivanič, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context . London: Routledge.
5.
Burgess, A. ( 2004). New discourses, new identities: A study of writing and learning in adult literacy education. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 13(2), 41-62.
6.
Burgess, A. ( 2008). The literacy practices of recording achievement: How a text mediates between the local and the global. Journal of Education Policy, 23(1), 49-62.
7.
Burgess, A. (in press). Making space and time for learning: The use of space-time to construct identity and context in two adult literacy classrooms. Ethnography and Education.
8.
Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). The politics of writing . London: Routledge.
9.
Clayton, E. ( 2000). Writing the writer, reading the writer. The discoursal construction of writer identity: An investigation with ten writers and the readers of their "work experience" letters. Unpublished MA dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language, Lancaster University .
10.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. ( 2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge .
11.
Fairclough, N. ( 1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge : Polity Press.
12.
Fairclough, N. ( 2003). Analysing discourse: Text analysis for social research . London: Routledge.
13.
Gee, J.P. ( 1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor Francis. (Original work published 1990)
14.
Gee, J.P. ( 1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method . London: Routledge.
15.
Geertz, C. ( 1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture . In The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Goffman, E. ( 1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1959)
17.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. ( 1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
18.
Literacies for Learning in Further Education; Retrieval date 16 Feb 2010-02-18 http://www.lancs.ac.uk/lflfe
19.
Ivanič, R. ( 1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
Ivanič, R. ( 2004a). Intertextual practices in the construction of multimodal texts in inquiry-based learning. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome (Eds.). Intertextuality and literacy in classrooms: Directions in educational research . Westport, CT: Greenwood. pp. 279-314
21.
Ivanič, R. ( 2004b). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18, 220-245.
22.
Ivanič, R. ( 2005). The discoursal construction of writer identity. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (Rev. ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. pp. 391-416
23.
Ivanič, R. ( 2006). Language, learning and identification. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickens , H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics. London: Equinox. pp. 7-29
24.
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. ( 2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Writing in a Second Language [Special issue], 10(1), 1-31.
25.
Ivanič, R., Edwards, R., Barton, D., Martin-Jones, M., Fowler, Z., Hughes, B., et al. (2009). Improving learning in college: Rethinking literacies across the curriculum. London: Routledge.
26.
Kell, C. ( 2009). Literacy practices, text/s and meaning across time and space. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 75-99
27.
Kress, G. ( 1996). Representational resources and the production of subjectivity . In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge. pp. 15-31
28.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. ( 1996) ReadingImages: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
29.
Kress, G. ( 1997) Before Writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
30.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
31.
Lemke, J. ( 2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, Activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity , 7, 273-290.
32.
Lemke, J. ( 2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialisation: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum. pp. 68-87
33.
Pahl, K. ( 2007). Timescales and ethnography: Understanding a child’s meaning-making across three sites, a home, a classroom and a family literacy class. Ethnography and Education, 2, 175-190.
34.
Pitt, K. ( 2008). Sourcing the self: Debating the relations between language and consciousness (Contemporary Studies in Descriptive Linguistics, Vol. 21) . Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
35.
Satchwell, C., & Ivanič, R. (2009). Reading and writing the self as a college student: Fluidity and ambivalence across contexts. In K. Ecclestone, G. Biesta, & M. Hughes (Eds.), Lost in transition? Change and becoming through the life-course. London: Falmer. pp. 47-68
36.
Scott, M. ( 2000). Agency and subjectivity in student writing. In C. Jones, J. Turner, & B. Street (Eds.), Students writing in the university: Cultural and epistemological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 171-191
37.
Street, B., & Lefstein, A. ( 2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book for students. London: Routledge.
38.
van Leeuwen, T. ( 1995). Representing social action. Discourse & society, 6(1), 81-106.
39.
van Leeuwen, T. ( 1996). The representation of social actors. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32-70). London: Routledge.
40.
Wortham, S. ( 2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 228-246.
41.
Wortham, S. ( 2008). The objectification of identity across events. Linguistics and Education, 19, 294-311.
42.
Zerubavel, E. ( 1981). Hidden rhythm: Schedules and calendars in social life . Berkeley: University of California Press.
