This article offers a way of using the theory of audience design—how speakers position different audience groups as main addressees, overhearers, or bystanders—for written discourse. It focuses on main addressees, that is, those audience members who are expected to participate in and respond to a speaker’s utterances. The text samples are articles, letters, and editorials on women’s suffrage that were published between 1909 and 1912 in Canadian periodicals. In particular, the author analyzes noun phrases with which suffrageskeptical women are addressed, relying on the theory of constitutive rhetoric to highlight the interpellative force with which the audience design of this public political debate operates.
Althusser, L. ( 1994). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 100-141). London: Verso.
2.
Austin, A. ( 1907, June). Smoothing the way of the working girl. Busy Man’s Magazine (Maclean’s), 14, 23-27.
3.
Bacchi, C.L. ( 1983). Liberation deferred?: The ideas of the English-Canadian suffragists, 1877-1918. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
4.
Bell, A. ( 1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
5.
Bitzer, L.F. ( 1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
6.
Burke, K. ( 1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Camhi, J.J. ( 1994). Women against women: American anti-suffragism, 1880-1920 . Brooklyn, NY: Carlson.
8.
Charland, M. ( 1987). Constitutive rhetoric: The case of the peuple québécois . Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73, 133-150.
9.
Clark, H.C. ( 1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Cleverdon, C.L. ( 1950). The woman suffrage movement in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
11.
Cohen, P.N. ( 1996). Nationalism and suffrage: Gender struggle in nation-building America. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 21, 707-727.
12.
Colonel. (1910, December 3). Editorial. Saturday Night, p. 1.
13.
Curzon, S.A. ( 1884, May 29). Platform women. Letter. The Week , 1, p. 408.
14.
Denison, F.M. ( 1910, December 10). From a suffragette [Letter]. Saturday Night, p. 2.
15.
Devereux, C. ( 2005). Growing a race: Nellie L. McClung and the fiction of eugenic feminism. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
16.
Dorland, M., & Charland, M. ( 2002). Law, rhetoric, and irony in the formation of Canadian civil culture. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
17.
Elizabeth. (1910, February 26). Letter. The Globe [Toronto], p. 12.
18.
Fiamengo, J. ( 2002). A legacy of ambivalence: Responses to Nellie McClung . In V. Strong-Boag, M. Gleason, & A. Perry (Eds.), Rethinking Canada: The promise of women’s history (pp. 149-163). New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Frith, J.E. ( 1912, July 17). Woman franchise [Letter]. The Grain Growers’ Guide, p. 8.
20.
Gere, A.R., & Robbins, S.R. ( 1996). Gendered literacy in black and white: Turn-of-the-century African American and European American club women’s printed texts. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 21, 643-678.
21.
Gibbs, R., Mueller, R., & Cox, R. ( 1988). Common ground in asking and understanding questions. Language and Speech, 31, 321-335.
22.
Goffman, E. ( 1981). Footing. In Forms of talk (pp. 124-159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23.
Green, E.C. ( 1997). Southern strategies: Southern women and the woman suffrage question. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
24.
Heilmann, A., & Sanders, V. ( 2006). The rebel, the lady and the "anti": Femininity, anti-feminism, and the Victorian woman writer. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 289-300.
25.
Horton, W.S., & Gerrig, R.J. ( 2005). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40, 1-35.
26.
Jablonsky, T.J. ( 1994). The home, heaven, and mother party: Female anti-suffragists in the United States, 1868-1920. Brooklyn, NY: Carlson.
27.
Keysar, B., Barr, D.J., Balin, J.A., & Paek, T.S. ( 1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language , 39, 1-20.
28.
Ladegaard, H.J. ( 1995). Audience design revisited: Persons, roles and power relations in speech interactions. Language & Communication, 15, 89-101.
29.
Leacock, S. ( 1915, October). The woman question. Maclean’s Magazine, 28, 7-9.
30.
Leathes, S. ( 1914, May 2). Votes for women. University Magazine , 13, 68-78.
31.
Lonsdale, M. ( 1884, April 17). Scrap book: Platform women. Reprint from The Nineteenth Century. The Week, 1, 315-316.
32.
Macphail, A. ( 1910). The psychology of the suffragette. In Essays in fallacy (pp. 57-99). New York: Longmans Green.
33.
Macphail, A. ( 1914). On certain aspects of feminism. University Magazine, 13, 79-91.
34.
Madame. (1910, March 12). The other page. Saturday Night, p. 17.
35.
Marshall, S.E. ( 1997). Splintered sisterhood: Gender and class in the campaign against woman suffrage. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
36.
McClung, N.L. ( 1972). In times like these (Ed. and introd. V. Strong-Boag.) . Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Originally published 1915)
37.
McMaster, L. ( 2002). The urban working girl in turn-of-the-centuryCanadian fiction. Essays on Canadian Writing, 77, 1-25.
38.
Muriel. (1910, February 26). Letter. The Globe [Toronto], p. 12.
39.
Murray, K.B. ( 2004). Governing "unwed mothers" in Toronto at the turn of the twentieth century. Canadian Historical Review, 85, 253-276.
40.
Nystrand, M. ( 1982). Rhetoric’s "audience" and linguistics’ "speech community": Implications for understanding writing, reading, and text. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 1-28). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
Park, D.B. ( 1982). The meanings of "audience." College English , 44, 247-257.
42.
Parker, H. ( 1908). Guarding the interests of our working girls. Busy Man’s Magazine (Maclean’s), 15, 59-63.
43.
Progress. (1912, August 7). An ardent suffragist. [Letter]. The Grain Growers’ Guide , p. 12.
44.
Smith, G. ( 1874). Female suffrage. Canadian Monthly, 6, 68-78.
45.
Smith, G. ( 1890). Woman’s place in the state. The Forum, 8, 515-530.
46.
The Study Club. (1912). The Champion, 1, 6-8.
47.
Thieme, K. ( 2006). Uptake and genre: The Canadian reception of suffrage militancy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 279-288.
48.
Valverde, M. ( 1992). When the mother of the race is free: Race, reproduction, and sexuality in first-wave-feminism. In F. Iacovetta & M. Valverde (Eds.), Gender conflicts: New essays in women’s history (pp. 3-26). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
49.
Valverde, M. ( 1994). Moral capital. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 9, 213-232.
50.
Westwood, E.H. ( 1908, May-October). As the working girl sees it. Busy Man’s Magazine [Maclean’s], 16, 39-43.
51.
Youssef, V. ( 1993). Children’s linguistic choices: Audience design and societal norms. Language in Society, 22, 257-74.
