Through interviews with judges and victim advocates, courtroom observations, and rhetorical analyses of victims’ reactions to proposed sentences, the authors examine the features that judges and advocates think make victims’ arguments persuasive.The authors conclude that this genre, recently imposed upon the court, functions as a mediating device through which advocates push for collective change, particularly for judicial acceptance of personal and emotional appeals. This study understands genres as responsive to changes within the activity systems in which they work and extends knowledge about genres that function as advocacy tools within internal institutional systems.
Arrigo, B., & Williams, C.R. (2003). Victim vices, victim voices, and impact statements: On the place of emotion and the role of restorative justice in capital sentencing. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 603-626.
2.
Baltimore, City of. (2006). Sample victim impact statement. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from www.ci.baltimore.md.us/crime/downloads/sample%20victim%20impact%20statement.pdf
3.
Bandes, S. ( 1996). Empathy, narrative, and victim impact statements. University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 361-412.
4.
Bandes, S. ( 2000). When victims seek closure: Forgiveness, vengeance, and the role of government. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 27, 1-14.
5.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T.N. ( 1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
6.
Birkland, T.A. ( 1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18, 53-74.
7.
Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987).
8.
Conley, J., & O’Barr, W. (1990). Rules and relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Department of Community Correction, Adult Field Services Division. (2005). Adult field services 2005 annual report . Retrieved, October 4, 2009, from < http://www.co.hennepin.mn.us/portal/site/HCInternet/menuitem.3f94db53874f9b6f68ce1e10b1466498/?vgnextoid=4096aaec635fc010VgnVCM1000000f094689RCRD
10.
Devitt, A. ( 1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336-358). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.
11.
Devitt, A. ( 2004). Writing Genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
12.
Erez, E. ( 1999, July). Who’s afraid of the big bad victim? Victim impact statements as victim empowerment and enhancement of justice. Criminal Law Review, 545-556.
13.
Erez, E., & Tontodonato, P. (1990). The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcomes. Criminology, 28, 451-474.
14.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. ( 1967/2007). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NY: Aldine Transaction.
15.
Greene, E. ( 1999). The many guises of victim impact evidence and effects on jurors’ judgments. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 331-348.
16.
Hennepin County Attorney. (2008). Divisions/victim services. Retrieved October 4, 2009, from http://www.hennepinattorney.org/Divisions/AdministrationProsecution/VictimServices
17.
Hillenbrand. S.W., & Smith, B.E. ( 1989). Victim rights legislation: An assessment of its impact on criminal justice practitioners and victims. Executive summary. American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section, Victim Witness Project .
18.
Knievel, M.S. ( 2008). Rupturing context, resituating genre: A study of use-of-force policy in the wake of a controversial shooting. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 330-363.
19.
Ludwig, C. ( 2001). The utilization of victim impact statements and victim impact policy and instrumental design by the Third Judicial District Court system in Shawnee, County, Kansas. Masters in Criminal Justice Thesis, Washburn University of Topeka.
20.
Minnesota Office of Justice Programs. (2004 ). Victim impact statements. St. Paul, MN : Office of Justice Programs, 445 Minnesota St., Suite 2300, St. Paul, MN, 55101-1515.
21.
Minnesota Office of Justice Programs. (2008 ). Crime victim rights. St. Paul, MN: Office of Justice Programs, 445 Minnesota St., Suite 2300, St. Paul, MN, 55101-1515.
22.
Minnesota Second and Fourth Judicial Districts. (n.d.). Just for little kids.
23.
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission. ( 2009). Minnesota sentencing guidelines and commentary. St. Paul: Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission . Retrieved October 4, 2009, from http://www.msgc.state.mn.us/
24.
Minnesota Statute 611A.038(a). (2008). The right to give a statement at sentencing. Retrieved October 4, 2009 , from https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/
25.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving. (2003). Your victim impact statement. A part of your healing journey. Irving, TX, 75062-8187.
26.
Myers, B., & Arbuthnot, J. ( 1999). The effects of victim impact evidence on the verdicts and sentencing judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29, 95-112.
27.
Nadler, J., & Rose, M.R. ( 2003). Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment . Cornell Law Review, 88, 419-456.
28.
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991).
29.
Propen, A., & Schuster, M.L. (2008). Making academic work advocacy work: Technologies of power in the public arena. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 299-329.
30.
Ptacek, J. ( 1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial response. Boston: Northeastern Press .
31.
Schuster, M.L., & Propen, A. ( 2006). 2006 WATCH victim impact statement study. Retrieved October 4, 2009, from <http://www.watchmn.org/reports> ;
32.
Schuster, M.L., & Propen, A. (in press). Degrees of emotion: Judicial responses to victim impact statements . Law, Culture & the Humanities.
33.
South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989).
34.
Spinuzzi, C. ( 1996). Pseudotransactionality, activity theory, and professional writing instruction. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5, 295-308.
35.
Spinuzzi, C. ( 2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Villmoare, E., & Neto, V.V. ( 1987). Victim appearances at sentencing hearings under the California victims’ bill of rights. United StatesDepartment of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
