This article examines the influence of genre and gender on comments written by 108 sixth-grade teachers in response to two narrative and two persuasive papers. There were significant genre differences. Process, conventions, artistic style, and format were the focus of significantly greater numbers of comments directed to narrative writing. In contrast, meaning, organization, effort, and ideology were emphasized to a greater degree when teachers responded to persuasive writing. Teachers tended to indicate and make greater numbers of corrections and to provide more criticisms and lessons, explanations, and suggestions when the work was attributed to a male writer. Female teachers generally wrote greater numbers of comments and tended to indicate and make more corrections. Generally, teachers were reluctant to engage with the ideologies in students’ writing. There was a correlation between convention errors and the number and types of comments.
Anson, C. (1989). Response styles and ways of knowing. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 332-366). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2.
Bainbridge, J., Peterson, S., & Sumner, R. (1998). The influence of teachers’ perceptions of gender on the evaluation of grades 3, 6 and 9 students’ narrative writing. Alberta English, 36(1), 42-56.
3.
Bardine, B. A., Bardine, M. S., & Deegan, E. F. (2000). Beyond the red pen: Clarifying our role in the response process. English Journal, 90(1), 94-101.
4.
Barnes, L. (1990). Gender bias in teachers’ written comments. In S. L. Gabriel & I. Smithson (Eds.), Gender in the classroom: Power and pedagogy (pp. 140-185). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
5.
Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities, 11-18. London: Macmillan.
6.
Chapman, M. (1994). The emergence of genres: Some findings from an examination of first-grade writing. Written Communication, 11, 348-380.
7.
Connors, R. J., & Lunsford, A. A. (1993). Teachers’ rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44(2), 200-223.
8.
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1998). School achievement indicators program: 1998 reading and writing assessment. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author.
9.
Donovan, C. A. (2001). Children’s development and control of written story and informational genres: Insights from one elementary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 394-447.
10.
Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2000b). Ontario provincial report on achievement. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author.
11.
Egan, K. (1988). Primary understanding: Education in early childhood. New York: Routledge.
12.
Etaugh, C. B., Houtler, B., & Ptasnik, P. (1988). Evaluating competence of women and men: Effects of experimenter gender and group gender composition. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 191-200.
13.
Freedman, S. W. (1979). Why do teachers give the grades they do?College Composition and Communication, 30, 161-164.
14.
Haswell, R. H., & Haswell, J. T. (1996). Gender bias and critique of student writing. Assessing Writing, 3, 31-83.
15.
Kamberelis, G. (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403-463.
16.
Langer, J. A. (1985). Children’s sense of genre: A study of performance on parallel reading and writing tasks. Written Communication, 2(2), 157-187.
17.
Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education. (1995). Windows into the classroom: NAEP’s 1992 writing portfolio study. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Ohio Department of Education. (2000). Ohio sixth-grade proficiency test results: Gender and ethnic March 2000 test administration. Columbus, OH: Author.
20.
Pappas, C. (1993). Is narrative “primary”? Some insights from kindergarteners’ pretend readings of stories and information books. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(1), 97-129.
21.
Peterson, S. (1998). Evaluation and teachers’ perceptions of gender in sixth-grade student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 33(2), 181-208.
22.
Peterson, S. (2001). Teachers’ assessment of girls’ and boys’ narrative and persuasive writing. NRC Yearbook, 50, 483-494.
23.
Roulis, E. (1995). Gendered voice in composing, gendered voice in evaluating: Gender and the assessment of writing quality. In D. L. Rubin (Ed.), Composing social identity in written language (pp. 151-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Searle, D., & Dillon, D. (1980). The message of marking: Teacher written responses to student writing at intermediate grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 233-242.
25.
Smith, S. (1997). The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher responses to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 48(2), 249-268.
26.
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 148-156.
27.
Straub, R. (1997). Students’ reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 91-119.
28.
Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response. Assessing Writing, 7(1), 23-55.
29.
Tower, C. (2003). Genre development and elementary students’ informational writing: A review of the literature. Reading Research and Instruction, 42(4), 14-39.
