This article examines the appropriation of academic biliteracy by three French-speaking students at an English-medium university in the Canadian province of Québec. Drawing on Hornberger’s continua model of biliteracy, Bourdieu’s critical social theory, and philosophical hermeneutics, the author conceptualizes individual biliterate development as a subjective and intersubjective evaluative response to social contexts of possibilities for biliteracy. Case study data were collected during 2 ½ years and included autobiographical and text-based interviews, inventories and analyses of academic writing in English and French, classroom-based observations, field notes, and documentation of the legal, historical, institutional, and demographic contexts. Analyses of the participants’ negotiations and trajectories of bilingual academic writing development reveal the challenges and resources of bilingual writers to uphold their commitment to academic biliteracy within English-dominant institutional and disciplinary contexts. Implications for the advancement of multilingual academic literacies are drawn.
Ager, D. (1996). Francophonie in the 1990s: Problems and opportunities. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
2.
Ager, D. (1999). Identity, insecurity, and image: France and language. Clevedon, UK: Multi-lingual Matters.
3.
Allen, B., Qin, J., & Lancaster, F. W. (1994). Persuasive communities: A longitudinal analysis of references in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: 1665-1990. Social Sciences of Science, 24, 279-310.
4.
Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2001a). The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
5.
Ammon, U. (2001b). English as a future language of teaching at German universities? A question of difficult consequences, posed by the decline of German as a language of science. In U. Ammon (Ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities(pp. 343-361). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism(2nd ed.). London: Verso.
7.
Baker, C. (2003). Biliteracy and transliteracy in Wales. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), Revisiting the continua of biliteracy: A framework for educational research, policy, and practice in multilingual settings(pp. 71-90). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
10.
Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
11.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental research article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12.
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
13.
Belcher, D., & Braine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing in a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Belcher, D., & Connor, U. (2001). Reflections on multiliterate lives. Toronto, Canada: Multi-lingual Matters.
15.
Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (Eds.). (2001). Linking literacies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques[Language and symbolic power: The economics of linguistic exchanges]. Paris: Fayard.
17.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action[Practical reasons: On the theory of action]. Paris: Seuil.
18.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action(P. Bourdieu, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1994)
19.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002a). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002b). The fortunate traveler: Shuttling between communities and literacies by economy class. In D. Belcher & U. Connor (Eds.), Reflections on multiliterate lives(pp. 23-37). Toronto, Canada: Multilingual Matters.
21.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2004). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
22.
Carey, S. (1997). Language management, official bilingualism, and multiculturalism in Canada. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 204-223.
23.
Casanave, C. (1998). Transitions: The balancing act of bilingual academics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 175-204.
24.
Casanave, C. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Colombi, C. (2002). Academic language development in Latino students’ writing in Spanish. In C. Colombi & M. Schleppegrell (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in a first and second languages(pp. 67-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Colombi, C., & Schleppegrell, M. (Eds.). (2002). Developing advanced literacy in a first and second languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Conseil de la langue française. (1996). Actes du colloque international: Le français et les langues scientifiques de demain [Proceedings of the International Colloquium on French and Tomorrow’s Languages of Science]. Québec, Canada: Gouvernement du Québec. Retrieved November 2, 2003, from http://www.clf.gouv.qc.ca
28.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
29.
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Cumming, A. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 61-78.
31.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 663-688.
32.
Delisle, J. (1993). La traduction raisonnée[Reasoned translation]. Ottawa, Canada: Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.
33.
García, O. (2002). Writing backwards across languages: The inexpert English/Spanish biliteracy of uncertified bilingual teachers. In C. Colombi & M. Schleppegrell (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in a first and second languages(pp. 245-259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistic and literacies: Ideology in discourses(2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
35.
Gentil, G. (2000, March). Language, power, and identity: Insights from moral philosophy. Paper presented at the 2000 American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
36.
Gentil, G. (2002a). Academic biliteracy and identity construction: Case studies of francophone science writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
37.
Gentil, G. (2002b, April). The construction of identity in academic writing: Case studies of francophone students in an anglophone institution. Paper presented at the Annual Conferences of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Salt Lake City, UT.
38.
Gentil, G. (2004a, September). EAP and technical writing without borders: Impact of departmentalization on the teaching and learning of academic writing in a first and second language. Paper presented at the Symposium on Second Language Writing, West Lafayate, IN.
39.
Gentil, G. (2004b, May). Transnationalism and academic biliteracy: Case studies of francophone academics in the crossfire. Paper presented at the Annual Conferences of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Portland, OR.
40.
Gentil, G. (in press). Anglais et français en contact: études de cas d’universitaires francophones en milieu anglophone [French and English in contact: Case studies of francophone scholars in anglophone milieus]. Proceedings of the International Colloquium. Contact de langues et minorisation [Languages in contact and minorization] Université de Neuchâtel et Institut Universitaire Kurt Bösch, Bramois, Switzerland.
41.
Godin, B., & Vallières, F. (1995). Endangered species? Une nouvelle estimation de la part du français dans les communications scientifiques[Anew assessment of the share of French in scientific communications]. Québec, Canada: Conseil de la langue française.
42.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
43.
Harklau, L., Losey, K. M., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (1999). Generation 1.5 meets college composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Heller, M. (1999). Heated language in a cold climate. In Jan Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates(pp. 143-170). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
45.
Heller, M. (2003). Crosswords: Language, education, and ethnicity in French Ontario. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Grutyer.
46.
Hornberger, N. (1989). Continua of biliteracy. Review of Educational Research, 59, 271-291.
47.
Hornberger, N. (Ed.). (2003). Revisiting the continua of biliteracy: A framework for educational research, policy, and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
48.
Hornberger, N., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2003). Revisiting the continua of biliteracy: International and critical perspectives. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), Revisiting the continua of biliteracy: A framework for educational research, policy, and practice in multilingual settings(pp. 35-67). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
49.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
50.
Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1-12.
51.
Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52.
Ivanic, R., & Meldon, S. (1999). Researching the writer-reader relationship. In N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes, and practices(pp. 168-192). New York: Longman.
53.
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Kachru, B. (2001). World Englishes. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics(pp. 519-524). New York: Elsevier.
55.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56.
Kögler, H. H. (1996). The power of dialogue: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (P. Hendrickson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1992)
57.
Kubota, R. (2001). My experience of learning to read and write in Japanese as L1 and English as L2. In D. Belcher & U. Connor (Eds.), Reflections on multiliterate lives(pp.96-109). Toronto, Canada: Multilingual Matters.
58.
Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (2003). Language rights and political theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 3-21.
59.
Leki, I. (2000). Writing, literacy, and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 99-115.
60.
Maguire, M., & Graves, B. (2001). Speaking personality in primary school children’s L2 writing. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 561-593.
61.
Martel, A. (2001). When does knowledge have a national language: Language policy-making for science and technology. In U. Ammon (Ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities(pp. 27-58). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
62.
Martin-Jones, M., & Jones, K. (2000). Multilingual literacies: Reading and writing different worlds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63.
Matsuda, P. K. (1998). Situating ESL writing in a cross-disciplinary context. Written Communication, 15, 99-121.
64.
Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing(pp. 15-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Maurais, J. (1996). Les politiques nationales et les langues scientifiques [National policies and languages of science]. In Conseil de la langue française(pp. 295-298). Québec, Canada: Gouvernement du Québec. Retrieved November 2, 2003, from http://www.clf.gouv.qc.ca
66.
McKay, S. (1993). Examining L2 composition ideology: A look at literacy education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(1), 65-81.
67.
Noreiko, S. (1993). New words for new technologies. In C. Sanders (Ed.), French today (pp. 171-184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31.
69.
Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 287-306.
70.
Phillipson, R. (2001). English for globalisation or for the world’s people?International Review of Education, 47(3/4), 185-200.
71.
Plourde, M. (Ed.). (2000). Le français au Québec[French in Québec]. Québec, Canada: Fides/Publications du Québec.
72.
Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73.
Raikhel, N. (2002). Our new impact factor. Plant Physiology, 130(3), 3-3.
74.
Raimes, A. (1998). Teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 142-167.
75.
Rampton, B. (1990). Displacing the “native speaker”: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ESL Journal, 44, 91-101.
76.
Ricoeur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre[Oneself as another]. Paris: Seuil.
77.
Schwandt, T. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed., pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
Shusterman, R. (Ed.). (1999). Bourdieu: A critical reader. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
80.
Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. (Eds.). (2001). On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81.
Statistics Canada. (2001). Census 2001. Retrieved November 3, 2003, from http://www.statcan.ca/english/census01
82.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
Swales, J. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85.
Swales, J. (2000). Language for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 59-76.
86.
Taylor, C. (1982). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In A. Bredo & W. Feinberg (Eds.), Knowledge and values in social and educational research(pp. 153-186). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Original work published 1971)
87.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
Thériault, J. Y. (2001). La langue, symbole de l’identité québécoise [Language as a symbol of the Québécois identity]. In Le Français au Québec(pp. 254-259). Québec, Canada: Fides/Les Publications du Québec.
89.
Truchot, C. (2001). The languages of science in France: Public debate and language policies. In U. Ammon (Ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities(pp. 319-328). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
90.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91.
Walter, H. (2001). Honni soit qui mal y pense: L’incroyable histoire d’amour entre le françaiset l’anglais[Honni soit qui mal y pense: The incredible love history between French and English]. Paris: Robert Laffont.
92.
Wenger, E. (1998). Community of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
93.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94.
Wesche, M. B., Morrison, F., Ready, D., & Pawley, C. (1990). French immersion: Postsecondary consequences for individuals and universities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 46, 430-451.
95.
Zamel, V., & Spack, R. (Eds.). (1998). Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
