Differential Error Types in Second-Language Students’ Written and Spoken Texts

Abstract

This article reports on an empirical study undertaken at the University of the North, South Africa, to test personal classroom observation and anecdotal evidence about the persistent gap between writing and spoken proficiencies among learners of English as a second language. A comparative and contrastive analysis of speech samples in the study showed a significant higher proportion of morpho-syntactic nonstandard forms in the learners’ written compositions and more nonstandard discourse forms in their oral presentations. As a result, it is argued that this gap may be minimized when learners’written interlanguage variety is used productively as a means toward normative writing proficiency. Recommendations for remedial instruction in second-language writing pedagogy, within the framework of Cummins’s conversational abilities and academic language proficiency, are offered for adaptation in comparable situations.

Keywords

second language interlanguage writing composition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell, J. , & Burnaby, B. (1984). A handbook for ESL literacy. Toronto: OISE.

Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning model. Language and Learning, 28, 69-83.

Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic writing as a social practice. Philadelphia: Tempe University Press.

Brown, D. , & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Buthelezi, Q. (1995). South African Black English: Lexical and syntactic characteristics. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Language and social history: Studies in South African sociolinguistics. Cape Town, South Africa: David Philip.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Currie, P. (2001). On the question of power and control. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Frodesen, J. (2001). Grammar in writing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Florence, KY: Heinle and Heinle Thomson Learning.

Grabe, W. (2001). Notes toward a theory of second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). Fourth generation writing assessment. In T. Silva & P.K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

House, J. , & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routines. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.

12.

Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory and applications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.

13.

Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Florence, KY: Heinle and Heinle Thomson Learning.

14.

Makalela, L. (1998). Institutionalized Black South African English. NAETE Journal, 1(13), 55-71.

15.

Mora, G. (1998). Development and second language writing. Retrieved from http://coe.sdsu.edu/people/mora/L2writingmmdl/default.htm

16.

North, S. , & Pillay, H. (2002). Homework: Re-examining the routine. ELT Journal, 56, 137-145.

17.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Republic of South Africa . (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996, as adopted on 8 May 1996 and amended on 11 October 1996 by the Constitutional Assembly).

19.

Santos, T. (1992). Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(1), 1-15.

20.

Santos, T. (2001). The place of politics in second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. Iral, 10, 219-231.

22.

Sengupta, S. , & Xiao, M. K. (2002). The contextual reshaping of beliefs about L2 writing: Three teachers’ practical process of theory construction. TESL-EJ, 6(1), A1.

23.

Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Development, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.

25.

Silva, T. , & Matsuda. P. (Eds.). (2001). On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

26.

Susser, B. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL Writing instruction. Journal of Second language writing, 3(1), 31-47.

27.

Tompkins, G. E. (1990). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. Columbus, OH: Merill.

28.

White, R. (1981). Approaches to writing. Guidelines, 6, 1-11.

29.

Zamel, V. (1991). Acquiring language, literacy, and academic discourse: Entering ever new conversations. College ESL, 1(1) 10-18.