A Reexamination of Protoliteracy through an Analysis of Modern Chinese Character Use

Abstract

Chinese characters are often viewed as a premodern or incomplete form of literacy. Authors with an autonomous view of literacy view Chinese as a concrete, homeostatic language inadequate for use in abstract thought and movement toward mass literacy. Even those with an ideological model framework propose that the intrinsic nature of Chinese characters identifies it as an elite language of gentry and political rulers. This study reexamines this view of Chinese characters as a protoliteracy by investigating recent national literacy rates, economic trends, and relevant literature for East Asian nations that use Chinese characters as an integral part of their written language. The author argues for caution in using the protoliteracy paradigm for Chinese language reform because modern Chinese is associated with high levels of mass literacy and economic prosperity. In addition, recent cognitive and historical literature suggests Chinese characters are used in languages because of their advantages for abstract thought.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnove, R. F., & Graff, H. J. (1987). National literacy campaigns. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy a critical source book (pp. 591-615). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

China National Bureau of Statistics. (2002). China statistical yearbook 2002. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

Chinese Character Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2003, from http://www.mandarintools.com/chardict.html

Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction and what is literacy? In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy a critical source book (pp. 211-233). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 3-27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Graff, H. J. (1987). The nineteenth-century origins of our times. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy a critical source book (pp. 211-233). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Hannas, W. C. (1995). Korea’s attempts to eliminate Chinese characters and the implications for Romanizing Chinese. Language Problems and Language Planning, 19(3), 250-270.

Hirose, H. (1998). Identifying the Onand Kunreadings of Chinese characters: Identification of On versus Kun as a strategy-based judgment. In C. K. Leong & K. Tamaoka (Eds.), Reading and writing: An interdisciplinary journal, Vol. 10 (pp. 375-394). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Li, C., Nuttal, R., & Zhao, S. (1999). The effect of writing Chinese characters on success on the water-level task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(1), 91-105.

10.

Norbu, D. (2001). China’s Tibet policy. Surrey, UK: Curzon.

11.

Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.

12.

Ong, W. J. (1986). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In G. Baumann (Ed.), The written word: Literacy in transition (pp. 23-50). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

13.

Qian, Y., & Wu, J. (2003). China’s transition to a market economy how far across the river? In N. C. Hope, D. T. Yang, & M. Y. Li (Eds.), How far across the river? (pp. 31-63). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Richardson, H. E. (1984). Tibet and its history. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.

15.

Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Street, B. (1993). The new literacy studies. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy a critical source book (pp. 430-442). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

17.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2002a). Estimated illiteracy rate and illiterate population aged 15 years and older, by country, 1970-2015. Retrieved September 28, 2003, from http://portal.unesco.org/uis/TEMPLATE/html/Exceltables/education/View_Table_Literacy_Country_Age15+.xls

18.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2002b). Estimates and projections of adult illiteracy for population aged 15 to 24 years old, by country and by gender, 1970-2015. Retrieved September 28, 2003, from http://portal.unesco.org/uis/TEMPLATE/html/Exceltables/education/View_Table_Literacy_Country_Age15-24.xls

19.

World Bank. (1996). Literacy rate. Retrieved November 9, 2001, from http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/psd/compete.nsf/2de6e2c9593643fb852564900067eef7?OpenView&Start=30

20.

World Bank. (1999). Gross national product (GNP) per capita. Retrieved November 9, 2001, from http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/psd/compete.nsf/7349593d593389e88525648f00641829?OpenView