This article is concerned with characterizing literacy activity as it is practiced in professional workplaces. Its starting point is activity theory, which grew out of the work of Vygotsky and has been subsequently elaborated in Russia and elsewhere. First, the authors propose that existing versions of activity theory are unable to account adequately for practical human activity in contemporary workplaces, and present a revised perspective that opens the way for new theoretical developments. Second, they elaborate two new constructs, task and work ensemble, and apply them to a short collaborative writing sequence collected in the field. Both constructs are seen to account in a substantive way for the structure of the composing activity carried out by the collaborators. They close with a discussion of the complementarity and theoretical advantages of the two constructs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Blauberg, I. V., Sadovsky, V. N., & Yudin, E. G. (1977). Systems theory: Philosophical and methodological problems(S. Syrovatkin & O. Germogenova, Trans.). Moscow: Progress.
4.
Bracewell, R. J. (1999). Objects of study in situated literacy: The role of representation in moving from data to explanation. Written Communication, 16(1), 76-92.
5.
Bracewell, R. J., & Breuleux, A. (1994). Substance and romance in the analysis of thinkaloud protocols. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology(pp. 55-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Breuleux, A., Bracewell, R. J., & Renaud, P. (1995). Cooperation, sharing, and support between specialists in producing technical documentation. Journal of the American Society for Technical Communication, 42(1), 155-160.
7.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educationalconsiderations(pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Crammond, D. G. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15(2), 230-268.
9.
Davydov, V. V.,& Radzihovskii, L. A. (1985). Vygotsky’s theory and the activity-oriented approach to psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives(pp. 35-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DeRemer, M. L. (1998). Writing assessment: Raters’ elaboration of the rating task. Assessing Writing, 5(1), 7-29.
11.
Emmanuel, S. M. (Ed.). (2001). The Blackwell guide to the modern philosphers: From Descartes to Nietzsche. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
13.
Engeström, Y. (1995). Innovative organizational learning in medical and legal settings. In L. Martin, K. Nelson, & E. Tobach (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of knowing and doing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Ericsson, K. A.,& Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
16.
Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 371-458.
17.
Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
18.
Granott, N. (1998). Unit of analysis in transit: From the individual’s knowledge to the ensemble process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(1), 42-66.
19.
Groen, G. (1978). The theoretical ideas of Piaget and educational practice. In P. Suppes (Ed.), Impact of research on education: Some case studies(pp. 267-317). Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
20.
Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). Achronometric analyses of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329-343.
21.
Groen, G. J.,& Resnick, L. B. (1978). Canpreschool children invent addition algorithms? Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(6), 645-652.
22.
Haas, C.,& Witte, S. P. (1999, April). Transformations of printlinguistic and graphic information in studies of situated literacy. Paper presented during the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montréal, Canada.
23.
Haas, C., & Witte, S. P. (2001). Writing as an embodied practice: Acase of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 413-457.
24.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
25.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Hull, G., & Jury, M. (1998, April). Literacy practices and the “work event”: Examining writing and reading in the context of work. Paper presented during the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
27.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: Abiography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge(pp. 91-196).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, object, cognition(S. Syrovatkin, Trans.). Moscow: Progress. (Russian original published in 1980)
31.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality(M. J. Hall, Trans.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Russian original published in 1975)
32.
Luria, A. R. (1994). The problem of the cultural development of the child. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader(pp. 46-56). Oxford: Blackwell. (Englishlanguage original was published in The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35, 493-506)
33.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. New York: Prentice-Hall.
34.
Odell, L., & Goswami, D. (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York: Guilford.
35.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
36.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes(M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Russian original work published 1930)
38.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language(A. Kozulin, Ed.& Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Russian original work published 1934)
39.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minnick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology(Vol.1). New York: Plenum. (Russian original work published 1934)
40.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the cultural development of the child. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader(pp. 46-56). Oxford: Blackwell. (Essay originally published in English in The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415-432)
41.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation (R. van der Veer, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.),The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology(Vol.3, pp. 233-343). New York: Plenum.
42.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The history of the development of higher mental functions (M. J. Hall. Trans.). In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: The history of the development of higher mental functions(R. W. Rieber, Ed.) (Vol. 4, pp. 1-259). New York: Plenum.
43.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). Consciousness as a problem for the psychology of behavior (R. van der Veer, Trans.). In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology(R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock, Eds.) (Vol. 3, pp. 63-79). New York: Plenum.
44.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader(pp. 97-174). Oxford: Blackwell.(Based on a 1930 English-language manuscript given by Luria to Michael Cole)
45.
Vygotsky, L. S.,& Luria, A. R. (1999). Tool and sign in the development of the child (M. J. Hall, Trans.). In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Scientific legacy(R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock, Eds.) (Vol. 6, pp. 3-68). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
46.
Wertsch, J. V., Minick, N., & Arns, F. J. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem solving. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context(pp. 151-171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Witte, S. P. (1998). Literate communication within professional work activity: Toward an activity theoretic perspective on expertise, unit of analysis, and methodology in advanced workplaces. CRWL Technical Report. Kent, OH: Kent State University, Center for Research on Workplace Literacy.
48.
Yudin, E. G. (1978). Sistemnyi podkhod i printsip deyatel’nosti[The systems approach and the principle of activity]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
