Via a Speak Aloud and Write protocol methodology, this study investigated the characteristics of the wording formulation process of a select group of 7 African American students in freshman composition who claimed nonstandard features were active at least 30% to 40% of the time while they composed their papers. Control of rhetorical context was established in terms of tone (formal), purpose (to explain or argue), audience (English instructor), and the time-place context (“simultaneously” spoken-written at one sit-ting). Two Speak Aloud and Write transcripts per participant were analyzed for grammatical and “pronunciation-related” nonstandard feature dynamics in reference to consequences on the page, given the requirements of freshman composition. Findings indicate complex dynamics at work in the form of 7 feature dynamic patterns and 19 variations, with particularly marked activity in relation to a consonant cluster reduction feature and to specific verbal nonconcord features. Also, students who shared feature dynamics pattern characteristics generally shared literacy background characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balester, V. (1993). Cultural divide: A study of African-American college-level writers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
2.
Ball, A. F. (1992). Cultural preference and the expository writing of African American adolescents. Written Communication, 3, 501-532.
3.
Berkenkotter, C. (1984). Student writers and their sense of authority over texts. College Composition and Communication, 35, 312-319.
4.
Campbell, K. E. (1991). “Bad English” and “slang”: Students' perceptions of dialect in writing (Report No. CS 212 849). Boston, MA: 42nd Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED332213)
5.
Campbell, K. E. (1997). “Real niggaz don't die”: African American students speaking themselves into their writing. In C. Severino, J. Guerra, & J. Butler (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings (pp. 67-78). Modern Language Association.
6.
Chafe, W. L. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning (pp. 105-123). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Chapman, I. T. (1994). Dissin' the dialectic on discourse surface differences. Composition Chronicle, 7(1), 4-7.
8.
Ciske, M. D. (1986). An error analysis of Standard English verb use by speakers of a nonstandard black dialect (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 10A.
9.
Collins, J. (1971). Deviations from Standard English in written compositions of disadvantaged college freshmen and regular admissions students at Glassboro State College (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1971). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 749A.
10.
Coleman, C. F. (1997). Our students write with accents—oral paradigms for ESD students. College Composition and Communication, 48(4), 486-500.
11.
Cran, W. (Director/Producer). (1986). Program 5: Black on White. In The story of English [Videotape]. BBC: MacNeil-Lehrer Productions.
12.
Edwards, W. F. (1990). Phonetic differentiation between Black and White speech in eastside Detroit. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 41(2), 203-218.
13.
Farr-Whiteman, M. (1981). Dialect influence in writing. In M. FarrWhiteman (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 1. Variation in writing: Functional and linguistic-cultural differences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Farr-Whiteman, M., & Janda, M. A. (1985). Basic writing students: Investigating oral and written language. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 62-83.
15.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981a). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
17.
Flower, L., & Hayes. J. R. (1981b, April). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.
18.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1, 1-28.
19.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1985). Counterstatement. Response to Marilyn Cooper and Michael Holzman, “talking about protocols” (with a reply by Marilyn Cooper and Michael Holzman). College Composition and Communication, 36, 94-100.
20.
Funkhouser, J. (1976). Black English: From speech to writing. Dissertation Abstracts International. 37, 2156A. (UMI No. 7622, 538)
21.
Getridge, C. M. (1997). Our story of Ebonics: A tale of language, literacy and earning. School Administrator, 54(8), 36-37.
22.
Gopaul-McNicol, S. A., Reid, G., & Wisdom, C. (1998). The psychoeducational assessment of Ebonics speakers: Issues and challenges. Journal of Negro Education, 67(1), 16-24.
23.
Halpern, W., & Liggett, S. (1984). Computers & composing: How the new technologies are changing writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
24.
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Heard, G. C., & Stokes, L. D. (1975). The relationship of psychocultural factors to Standard English use in the writing of selected Black college freshmen (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 10A.
26.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hull, G. (1987). The editing process in writing: A performance study of more skilled and less skilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 8-29.
28.
Johnson, E. B., II. (1998). The influence of speaking Black English on spelling in standardized English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 03A.
29.
Kirschner, S. A., & Poteet, G. H. (1973). Nonstandard English usage in the writing of Black, White, and Hispanic remedial English students in an urban community college. Research in the Teaching of English, 7, 351-355.
30.
Labov, W. (1969). A study of non-standard English. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED024053)
31.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
Lewis, M. A. (1999). African-American student code-switching in freshman English composition (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 02A.
33.
Martin, S. (1988). A description of cognitive processes during reading and writing. Reading Psychology, 9, 1-15.
34.
McCarthy, L. (1985, March). Situated protocols: Studying a college student's writing in class-room contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Minneapolis, MN.
35.
Mix, J. (1996). A study of nonstandard feature dynamics during vocalization for writing purposes on the part of African-American student writers in freshman composition (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 04A.
36.
Morrow, D. H. (1986). The relationship between feature alternation and error in Black American English in speech. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2063A. (UMI No. 8620, 314)
37.
Peck, M. (1982). An investigation of tenth-grade students' writing. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
38.
Peck, W. (1989). The effects of prompts upon revision: A glimpse of the gap between planning and performance (Reading-to-Write Report No. 7; Technical Report No. 26). Berkley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 597)
39.
Scott, J. C. (1981). The influence of spoken language patterns on the writing of Black college students. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English Research Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 217 411)
40.
Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Shuy, R. W. (1973). The study of vernacular Black English as a factor in educational change. Research in the Teaching of English, 6, 297-311.
42.
Shuy, R. W. (1981). A holistic view of language. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(2), 101-112.
43.
Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written Communication, 6, 463-479.
44.
Smagorinsky, P. (1994). Beyond the black box. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Sage series in written communication (Vol. 8). Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 3-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Smitherman, G. (1985). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. (Original work published 1977, Houghton Mifflin)
46.
Smitherman, G. (1992). Black English, diverging or converging? The view from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Language and Education, 6(1), 47-61.
47.
Smitherman, G., & Cunningham, S. (1997). Moving beyond resistance: Ebonics and African American youth. Journal of Black Psychology, 23(3), 227-232.
48.
Steinberg, E. R. (1986). Protocols, retrospective reports, and the stream of conscious-ness. College English, 48, 697-712.
49.
Sternglass, M. (1974). Close similarities in dialect features of Black and White college students in remedial composition classes. TESOL Quarterly, 3, 271-283.
50.
Students' rights to their own language. (1974, Fall). Special issue of College Composition and Communication.
51.
Visor, J. (1987). The impact of American Black English oral tradition features on decontextualization skills in college writing (Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 452A.
52.
Wardhaugh, R. (1990). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
53.
Weaver, C. (1998). Ebonics and the “parsley” problem: Personal reflections. In C. Weaver (Ed.), Lessons to share on teaching (pp. 228-243). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton-Cook.
54.
White, M. J., Vandiver, B. J., & Becker, M. L. (1998). African American evaluations of Black English and Standard American English. Journal of Black Psychology, 24(1), 60-75.
55.
Witte, S. P., & Cherry, R. D. (1994). Think-aloud protocols, protocol analysis, and research design: An exploration of the influence of writing tasks on writing processes. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Sage series in written communication (Vol. 8). Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 20-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Reprinted in Wolfram, W., & Whiteman, M. F. (1971). The role of dialect interference in composition. The Florida FL reports 9, 59(1), 34-38.
57.
Wright, B. H. (1985). Hypercorrections and dialect forms in the compositions of native born college students from Georgia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 3340A.
58.
Wright, S. (1985). A description of the variance between the oral and written language patterns of a group of Black community college students (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 1267A.
