Popular accounts of scientific discoveries diverge from scholarly accounts, stripping off hedges and promoting short-term social consequences. This case study illustrates how the “horse-race” framing of popular accounts devalues the collective sharing, challenging, and extending of scientific work. In her best-selling Longitude, Dava Sobel (1996) depicts John Harrison's 18th-century invention of a marine chronometer, a ground-breaking precision instrument that eventually allowed sailors to calculate their longitude at sea, as an unequal race with Harrison as beleaguered hero. Sobel represents the demands of the Board of Longitude to test and replicate the chronometer as the obstructionist machinations of an academic elite. Her framing underreports the feasibility of the chronometer and its astronomical rival, the lunar distance method, which each satisfied different criteria. That readers accept Sobel's framing is indicated by an analysis of 187 reviews posted on Amazon.com, suggesting that popular representation of science fuels cynicism in popular and academic forums.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Trans-actions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
Campbell, W. (1997). The worm and the tumor: Reflections on Fibiger's Nobel Prize. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 40(4), 498-505.
4.
(Reprinted from College Composition and Communication, 47[4], 567-593, 1996)
5.
(Reprinted from Written Communication, 3, 275-296, 1986)
6.
Francis, D. H., & Sandberg, W. R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 5-25.
7.
Gladwell, M. (2002, May 27). The televisionary: Big business and the myth of the lone inventor. The New Yorker, 112.
8.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
9.
Gould, R. (1960). The Marine Chronometer. London: Holland Press. (Original work published in 1923)
10.
Howse, D. (1989). Nevil Maskelyne: The seaman's astronomer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Jacob, M., & Reid, D. (2001). Technical knowledge and the mental universe of Manchester's early cotton manufacturers. Canadian Journal of History, 36, 283-304.
Katz, S. B. (1992). Narration, technical communication, and culture: The soul of a new machine as narrative romance. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing Rhetorical Education (pp. 382-402). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14.
Kaufer, D. S., & Geisler, C. (1989). Novelty in academic writing. Written Communication, 6, 286-311.
15.
Kidder, T. (1982). The soul of a new machine. New York: Avon.
16.
Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(1), 28-52.
18.
Lanham, F. (1998, Oct 4). Dava Sobel: The illustrated longitude. The Houston Chronicle, p. 5.
19.
Mahoney, M. (1993). Longitude in the context of the history of science. In W. Andrewes (Ed.), The quest for longitude. London: Science Museum.
20.
Myers, G. (1985a). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
21.
Myers, G. (1985b). Nineteenth century popularizations of thermodynamics and the rhetoric of social prophecy. Victorian Studies, 29, 35-66.
22.
Myers, G. (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 265-272.
23.
Neergaard, L. (2002, Oct 10). Mixed messages continue on breast cancer. The Cincinnati Post, p. B1.
24.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology (Rev. ed.). New York: Freeman.
25.
Observations of latitude and longitude at all remarkable points. (1996, June 19). An exhibition of maps and navigational instruments. On view in the Tracy W. McGregor Room, Alderman Library, University of Virginia, July 10 to September 26, 1995. Retrieved from http://www.lib.virginia.edu/speccol/exhibits/lewis_clark/ch5.html
26.
Paul, D. (2002). Spreading chaos: The role of popular scientific literature in interdisciplinary diffusion. Paper presented at 10th biennial meeting of the Rhetoric Society of America, Las Vegas, NV, May 25, 2002.
27.
Paul, D., Charney, D., & Kendall, A. (2001). Moving beyond the moment: Reception studies in the rhetoric of science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 372-399.
28.
Payne, A. A. (2003). The effects of congressional appropriation committee membership on the distribution of federal research funding to universities. Economic Inquiry,41(2), 325-346.
29.
Popper, K. (1971). The open society and its enemies (2 vols., 5th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Prince-ton University Press.
30.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Prince-ton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reed, R. (2001). (Un-)Professional discourse? Journalists' and scientists' stories about science in the media. Journalism, 2(3), 279-298.
33.
Rowan, K. (1989). Moving beyond the what to the why: Differences in professional and popular science writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19, 161-179.
34.
Sobel, D. (1996). Longitude: The true story of a lone genius who solved the greatest scientific problem of his time (paperback ed.). New York: Walker.
35.
Sobel, D., & Andrewes, W. J. H. (1998). The illustrated longitude. New York: Walker.
36.
Stewart, L. (1998). A meaning for machines: Modernity, utility, and the eighteenth-century British public. The Journal of Modern History, 70(2), 259-295.
37.
Sturridge, C. (Writer/Director). (2000). Longitude [Motion picture]. United Kingdom: Granada Film Production.
38.
Waldman, P., & Jamieson, K. H. (2003). Rhetorical convergence and issue knowledge in the 2000 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33, 145-164.
39.
Watson, J. (1980). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. In G. Stent (Ed.), Norton critical edition. New York: Norton.
40.
Williams, C. J. (2001, December 2). Mistakes and oversights: Occasionally, those judging physics, chemistry and medicine are susceptible to the imperfections of human nature. Los Angeles Times, p. 40.
