For many researchers, grant proposals are a high-stakes genre crucial to their work; this pivotal genre does not exist in isolation but as part of a complex reticulation of genres that interact to form a genre system. This article explores the genre system of academic research funding in terms of the following questions: (a) What is the nature of the genre system of grant funding? (b) What are the roles and functions of that system? and (c) What does exploration of the system reveal about genre knowledge and how writers develop such knowledge? Findings suggest that grant writing is fundamentally a social activity, that the intertextual networks of the genre system serve to navigate writers through that system and to build the writers’ knowledge of the system, and that knowledge of a genre system may differ in important ways from knowledge of an isolated genre.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
4.
Beaufort, A. (1997). Operationalizing the concept of discourse community: A case study of one institutional site of composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 486-529.
5.
Berkenkotter, C. (2001). Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and the rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication, 18, 326-349.
6.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10, 475-509.
7.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
9.
Bhatia, V. K. (1999). Integrating products, processes, purposes and participants in professional writing. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 21-39). London: Longman.
10.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
11.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Connor, U. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of U.S. humanists and scientists. Text, 20, 1-28.
13.
Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47-62.
14.
Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in accounting. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 336-337). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
Devitt, A. (2000). Integrating rhetorical and literary theories of genre. College English, 62, 696-718.
16.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. New York: Longman.
17.
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kamberelis, G. (1995). Genre as institutionally informed social practice. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 115-171.
19.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
21.
Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-78). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
22.
Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23.
Paré, A. (2000). Writing as a way into social work: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 145-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
24.
Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
26.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: Academic writing in research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Winsor, D. A. (1999). Genre and activity systems: The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16, 200-224.
28.
Winsor, D. A. (2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 5-28.
