Using the notion of design developed as part of the New London Group's Multiliteracies Project, this qualitative multicase study examines undergraduate academic literacy as a multimodal achievement game. Retrospective interviews and textual analyses revealed a series of operations on course content that constituted moves in the game. The goal of the game was to find, move, and display content, including not only facts but also concepts and forms of situated knowledge that would gain the highest points on assessments. Better “players” were more aware than their lower achieving counterparts of the game as specific activity different from learning. They also had more nuanced and planned versions of the operations that began with what was expected on assessments and moved backwards toward sources. Findings support forms of preparing students for academic success through the multiliteracies pedagogy that combines consciousness raising through overt instruction with forms of immersion and critical analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. A.
, & Dochy, F. (1994). Adults' views about knowing and believing. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 224-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Applebee, A.
(1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577-596.
3.
Bartholomae, D.
, & Petrosky, A. (1988). Facts, artifacts, and counterfacts: Theory and method for a reading and writing course. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton-Cook.
4.
Becker, H.
, Geer, B., & Hughes, E. C. (1968). The academic side of college life. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Berkenkotter, C.
, & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Block, E.
(1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.
7.
Bloome, D.
, Puro, P., & Theodorou, E. (1989). Procedural display and classroom lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 19, 265-291.
8.
Bogdan, R. C.
, & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Bucholtz, M.
(1999). Why be normal?: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society, 28(2), 203-223.
10.
Carson, J.
, Chase, N., Gibson, S., & Hargrove, M. (1992). Literacy demands of the undergraduate curriculum. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(4), 25-50.
11.
Caverly, D. C.
, & Orlando, V. P. (1991). Textbook study strategies. In R. Flippo & D. Caverly (Eds.), Teaching reading and study strategies at the college level (pp. 86-165). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12.
Cope, B.
, & Kalantzis, M. (2000a). Designs for social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 203-234). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13.
Cope, B.
, & Kalantzis, M. (2000b). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
14.
Crooks, T.J.
(1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
15.
Dretske, F.
(1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
16.
Entwistle, N.
(1984). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 1-18). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
17.
Entwistle, N.
(1987). A model of the teaching-learning process. In J. T. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. W. Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 13-28). Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education.
18.
Fairclough, N.
(2000). Multiliteracies and language: Orders of discourse and intertextuality. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 162-181). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
19.
Flower, L.
(1989). Negotiating academic discourse (Reading-to-Write Report No. 10, Technical Report No. 29). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 600)
20.
Freedman, A.
, Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11, 193-226.
21.
Freedman, A.
, & Medway, P. (1994). Introduction: New views of genre and their implications for education. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 1-22). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton-Cook.
22.
Gordon, C. M.
, & Hanauer, D. (1995). The interaction between task and meaning construction in EFL reading comprehension tests. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 299-324.
23.
Greene, S.
(1993) The role of task in the development of academic thinking though reading and writing in a college history course. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 46-75.
24.
Haas, C.
(1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11, 43-84.
25.
Halden-Sullivan, J.
(1998). Writing to learn, assessing to learn. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 3, 25-40.
26.
Hammer, D.
(1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics, Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
27.
Hasan, R.
(1998). The disempowerment game: Bourdieu and language in literacy. Linguistics and Education, 10, 25-87.
28.
Herrington, A. J.
(1985). Writing academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college mechanical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
29.
Hiebert, M.
, & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebger (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Hill, C.
, & Larsen, E. (2000). Children and reading tests. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Hill, C.
, & Parry, K. (1992). The test at the gate: Models of literacy in reading assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 433-461.
32.
Hill, C.
, & Parry, K. (1994). From testing to assessment: English as an international language. New York: Longman.
33.
Horowitz, D. M.
(1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445-462.
34.
Hounsell, D.
(1984). Learning and essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 103-123). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
35.
Israel, D.
, & Perry, J. (1991). Information and Architecture. In J. Barwise, J. M. Gawron, G. Plotkin, & S. Tutiya (Eds.), Situation theory and its applications (Vol. 2, pp. 147-159). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
36.
Johns, A. M.
(1991). Interpreting an English competency exam: The frustrations of an ESL science student. Written Communication, 8, 379-401.
37.
Johns, A. M.
(1997). Text, role and context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Kalantzis, M.
, & Cope, B. (2000). Changing the role of schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 121-148). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
39.
Kress, G.
(2000a). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In. B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153-161). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
40.
Kress, G.
(2000b). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
41.
Kvale, S.
(1993). Examinations reexamined: Certification of students or certification of knowledge? In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 215-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Langer, J.
(1992). Speaking of knowing: Conceptions of understanding in the academic disciplines. In A. Herrington and C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp. 69-85). New York: MLA.
43.
Laurillard, D.
(1984). Learning from problem solving. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 124-143). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
44.
Laurillard, D.
(1987). The different forms of learning in psychology and education. In J.T.E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. W. Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 198-207). Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education.
45.
Leki, I.
(1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 235-260.
46.
Lemke, J.
(2000). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10, 247-271.
47.
Mann, S.
(2000). The student's experience of reading. Higher Education, 39, 297-317.
48.
McCarthy, L. P.
(1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-265.
49.
Merriam, S. B.
(1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50.
Miller, C. M.
, & Parlett, M. R. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. Guildford, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education.
51.
Moffatt, M.
(1991). Coming of age in New Jersey. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
52.
Nelson, J.
(1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 362-396.
53.
New London Group
. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 113-131). New York: Routledge Kegan Paul. (Original work published in 1996)
54.
Newman, M.
(in press). Designs of academic literacy: A multiliteracies examination of academic achievement. Norwalk, CT: Greenwood.
55.
Newman, M.
, & Trenchs, M. (1997). El Joc Academic: Aprendre a llegir, aprendre a estudiar, aprendre a aprovar [The academic game: Learning to read, learning to study, learning to pass]. Temps d'Educació, 18, 131-156.
56.
Newman, M.
, Trenchs, M., & Pujol, M. (in press). Core academic literacy principles versus culture-specific practices: A multi-case study of academic achievement. English for Specific Purposes.
57.
Nist, S. L.
, Simpson, M. L., Olejnik, S., & Mealey, D. L. (1991). The relation between selfselected study processes and test performance. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 849-874.
58.
Nolen, S. B.
(1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
59.
Robinson, W. P.
, & Tayler, C. A. (1989). Correlates of low academic attainment in three countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 581-595.
60.
Simpson, M. L.
, & Nist, S. L. (1997). Perspectives on learning history: A case study. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 363-395.
61.
Spack, R.
(1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 3-62.
62.
Steinberg, I.
, Bohning, G., & Choning, F. (1991). Comprehension monitoring strategies of nonproficient college readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 30(3), 63-75.
63.
Thorkildsen, T. A.
, & Nicholls, J. G. (1991). Students' critiques as motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 347-368.
64.
Trimbur, J.
(1994). Taking the social turn: Teaching writing post-process. College Composition and Communication, 45, 108-118.
65.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wersch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Amronk, NY: Sharpe. (Original work published in 1960)
66.
Walvoord, B. E.
, & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
67.
Weinstein, C.
, & Meyer, D. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. ed., pp. 152-185). New York: Collier.
68.
Weinstein, C. E.
& Meyer, D. K. (1991). “Cognitive learning strategies and college teaching.” In Robert J. Menges & Marilla D. Svinicki (Eds.) College teaching: From theory to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69.
Wineburg, S.
(1997). Beyond “breadth and depth”: Subject matter knowledge and assessment. Theory Into Practice, 36, 255-261.
70.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
71.
Yorio, C.
(1986). Consumerism in second language learning and teaching. Canadian Modern Language Review, 42, 668-687.
