Texts function as both means and motive for human activity in the same way that other technological objects function: They move from private mediational means to public motive as part of the shifting consciousness that sustains the everyday life of complex organizations. In complex organizations, the status of text, the condition of public visibility, is an achievement rather than a given. Seeing texts as objects calls our attention to a range of textual phenomena associated with the advent of information technologies. In infomated environments, the virtual states of textual objects are becoming ever more ubiquitous and consequential. A sample analysis of the texts produced and used in the context of the new technology of personal digital assistants (PDAs) suggests, for example, that such “ITexts” may facilitate the migration of the documentary reality of the workplace into the home.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, C.
(1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
2.
Bazerman, C.
(1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 286-308.
3.
Berkenkotter, C.
, & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Blakeslee, A. M.
(1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 125-169.
5.
Brandt, D.
(1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of readers, writers, and texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
Briody, D.
(1999, November 22). Technology convergence. InfoWorld, 24, 14.
7.
Bucciarelli, L. L.
(1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Cantwell Smith, B.
(1998). On the origin of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Cole, M.
(1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
10.
Cole, M.
, & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Cowan, R. S.
(1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Cross, G. A.
(1993). The interrelation of genre, context, and process in the collaborative writing of two corporate documents. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 141-157). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
13.
Darrah, C. N.
, English-Lueck, J. A., & Freeman, J. M. (2000). Living in the eye of the storm: Controlling the maelstrom in Silicon Valley [Online]. Available: http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/anthropology/svcp/SVCPmael.html
14.
Darrah, C. N.
, English-Lueck, J. A., & Saveri, A. (1997). The infomated households project. Practicing Anthropology, 19, 18-22.
15.
Davidson, C. N.
(1998). No more separate spheres!Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
Deem, R.
(1986). All work and no play?: The sociology of women and leisure. London: Open University Press.
17.
Dias, P.
, Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
English-Lueck, J. A.
(1998). Technology and social change: The effects on family and community [Online]. Available: http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/anthropology/svcp/cossaP.htm
19.
Geisler, C.
(1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Geisler, C.
(in press). Palm technologies: An activity-theoretic approach to a study of the rapid emergence of a new writing tool. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves and societies: Research from activity perspectives. San Diego, CA: Mind, Culture, and Activity.
21.
Geisler, C.
, Bazerman, C., Doheny-Farina, S., Gurak, L., Haas, C., Johnson-Eilola, J., Kaufer, D. S., Lunsford, A., Miller, C. R., Winsor, D., & Yates, J. (in press). IText: Future directions for research on the relationship between information technology and writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication.
22.
Geisler, C.
, & Honeycutt, L. (1997, April). The reemergence of public discourse in multidisciplinary design. Paper presented at the meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Phoenix, AZ.
23.
Geisler, C.
, & Lewis, B. (in press). Remaking the world through talk and text: What we should learn from how engineers use language to design. In R. Horowitz (Ed.), Talking texts: Knowing the world through the evolution of instructional discourse. New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
Geisler, C.
, & Rogers, E. H. (2000). Technological mediation for design collaboration. Proceedings of the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 395-405). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
25.
Geisler, C.
, Rogers, E. H., & Haller, C. (1998). Disciplining discourse: Discourse practice in the affiliated professions of software engineering design. Written Communication, 15, 3-24.
26.
Gibson, J. J.
(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Henderson, K.
(1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in engineering. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 16, 448-473.
28.
Henwood, C. N. (1995). Literacy and the rhetoric of cultural values: The case of a religious health services organization. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 09A, 9544040.
29.
Hochschild, A. R.
(1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
30.
Honeycutt, L. (1998). Communicative grounding in online peer response groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
31.
Hutchins, E.
(1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Kanigel, R.
(1999). The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: Penguin.
33.
Kaptelinin, V.
(1997). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Kaufer, D. S.
, & Butler, B. S. (2000). Designing worlds with words: Representational principles of writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Latour, B.
(1995). Mixing humans and nonhumans together. The sociology of a door-closer. In S. L. Star (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology (pp. 257-277). Albany: SUNY Press.
36.
Leont'ev, A. N.
(1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Lewis, B. (1999). Talking to text and sketches: The function of written and graphic mediation in mechanical engineering design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
38.
Lunsford, A.
(1995). Reclaiming rhetorica: Women in the rhetorical tradition. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
39.
Luria, A. R.
(1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Medway, P.
(1996). Virtual and material buildings: Construction and constructionism in architecture and writing. Written Communication, 13, 473-514.
41.
Miller, C.
(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-176.
42.
Munger, R. (1997). Emergency medical technician run reports: A study of genre, practice, and reflection. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 09A, 9809478.
43.
Nocera, J.
(1999, March 29). Microsoft diary: Is Boies' paper trail Microsoft's burial ground?Fortune, 13, 135-136.
44.
Norman, D. A.
(1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Perseus.
45.
Nystrand, M.
(1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 66-85.
46.
Polanyi, M.
(1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1958)
47.
Prior, P.
(1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Russell, D. R.
(1997). Rethinking genre in school and society. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
49.
Smith, D. E.
(1984). Textually mediated social organization. International Social Science Journal, 36, 59-75.
50.
Sullivan, C.
(2000). Space and the intersection of work and family in homeworking households. Community, Work & Family, 3, 185-204.
51.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Waring, S. P.
(1991). Taylorism transformed: Scientific management theory since 1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
53.
Wertsch, J. V.
(1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
54.
Wertsch, J. V.
(1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Winsor, D. A.
(1999). Genre and activity systems: The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16, 200-224.
56.
Witte, S. P.
(1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
57.
Yates, J.
(1989). The emergence of the memo as a managerial genre. Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 485-510.
58.
Yates, J.
(1993). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
