Information is humanly created for human purposes in specific historical situations. This study examines how an anti-nuclear test activist group in the Cold War period, to foster public opposition to government policy, asserted an alternative understanding of information against centralized governmental definitions of information. Such citizen information, validated by citizen scientists to serve the needs and concerns of citizens, pervaded the antiwar, environmental, and consumer movements of the second half of the 20th century. An enthymematic analysis of the newsletter of the Greater St. Louis Citizens' Committee for Nuclear Information and successor journals reveals multiple assumptions embodied in beliefs and practices of citizen information. These beliefs and practices concern threats to everyday life, orientation toward threat-reducing action, large interested institutions that limit access to relevant information, science as an independent and objective source of information, and the responsibilities of a citizen to be informed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
. (1995). Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science Interim Committee
. (1957, 25 January). Social aspects of science. Science, 125, 143-147.
3.
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
(Ed.). (1978). Into the information age: A perspective for federal action on information (Report for the National Science Foundation). Chicago: American Library Association.
4.
Bazerman, C.
(1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
Bazerman, C.
(1994). Systems of genre and the enactment of social interntions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Rethinking genre (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
6.
Bazerman, C.
(1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 296-308.
7.
Bazerman, C.
(1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Bazerman, C.
(2000). A rhetoric for literate society: The tension between expanding practices and restricted theories. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Inventing a discipline (pp. 5-28). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
9.
Brewer, S. A.
(1997). To win the peace: British propaganda in the United States during World War II. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
California Digital Library
(1999). Magazine and article data base [Online]. Available: http://www.cdlib.org
11.
Commoner, B.
(1958, 2 May). The fallout problem. Science, 127, 1023-1026.
12.
Commoner, B.
(1966). Science and survival. New York: Viking.
13.
Compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary. (1971). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
Dickson, P.
(1976). The electronic battlefield. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
Dizard, W. B.
(1982). The coming information age. New York: Longman.
16.
Hammer, D. P.
(1976). The information age: Its development, its impact. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
17.
Helvey, T. C.
(1971). The age of information: An interdisciplinary survey of cybernetics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
18.
Hogerton, J. F.
(1963). The atomic energy deskbook. New York: Reinhold.
19.
Josey, E. J.
(Ed.). (1977). The information society: Issues and answers. Detroit, MI: American Library Association's Presidential Commission.
20.
Lapp, R.
(1959). Sunshine and darkness. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 15, 27-29.
21.
Lewenstein, B.
(1992). The meaning of `public understanding of science' in the United States after World War II. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 45-68.
22.
Lewenstein, B.
(1999). Shifting science from people to programs: AAAS in the postwar years. In S. G. Kohlsted, M. M. Sokal, & B. V. Lewenstein (Eds.), The establishment of science in America: 150 years of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (pp. 103-165). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23.
Libby, W. F.
(1956, 20 April). Radioactive fallout and radioactive strontium. Science, 123, 657-660.
24.
Lindee, M. S.
(1994). Suffering made real. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
25.
Linell, P.
(1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualization and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text, 18, 143-157.
26.
Lubar, S.
(1993). Infoculture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Media History Project [Online]. Available: http://www.mediahistory.org
28.
North, J. B.
(Ed.). (1970). The information conscious society. Washington, DC: American Society for Information Science.
29.
Porter, T.
(1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Reynolds, P. S.
(1994). Scientific information in wartime: The Allied-German rivalry, 1939-1945. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
31.
Russell, D. R.
(1997a). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
32.
Russell, D. R.
(1997b). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 224-237.
33.
Schudson, M.
(1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Free Press.
34.
Slamecka, V.
(1965). The coming age of information technology. Bethesda, MD: Documentation Incorporated.
35.
Smart, G.
(1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank's response to its executives' expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
36.
Smart, G.
(2000). Reinventing expertise: Experienced writers in the workplace encounter a new genre. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 223-252). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
37.
Smith, A. K.
(1965). A peril and a hope: The scientists' movement in America, 1945-47. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Sullivan, W. C., Jr.
(1982). Nuclear democracy: A history of the Greater St. Louis Citizens' Committee for Nuclear Information, 1957-1967. University College Occasional Papers, No. 1. St. Louis, MO: Washington University.
39.
Turkle, S.
(1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
Turkle, S.
(1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
41.
United States Atomic Energy Commission
. (1955). The effects of high-yield nuclear explosions. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42.
United States Department of Commerce
. (1977). The information economy (9 vols.). Washington, DC: Office of Telecommunications Special Publications.
43.
United States Privacy Protection Commission
. (1977). Personal privacy in an information society. Washington, DC: The Commission.
44.
Van Nostrand, A. D.
(1997). Fundable knowledge: The marketing of defense technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Winkler, A. M.
(1978). The politics of propaganda: The Office of War Information, 1942-1945. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
Wittner, L. S.
(1997). Resisting the bomb: History of the world nuclear disarmament movement, 1954-1970. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
47.
Yates, J.
(1988). Control through communication. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
