Barabas, C.
(1990). Technical writing in a corporate culture: A study of the nature of information. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
Bazerman, C.
, & Paradis, J. (1991). Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
Bracewell, R.
, & Breuleux, A. (1992, April). Cognitive principles for the support of technical writing. Paper presented at the 1992 Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
4.
Brandt, D.
(1995). Remembering writing, remembering reading. College Composition and Communication, 46, 459-479.
5.
Brandt, D.
(1998). Sponsors of literacy. College Composition and Communication, 49, 165-185.
6.
Brandt, D.
(2001). Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Duin, A. H.
, & Hansen, C. J. (Eds.). (1996). Nonacademic writing: Social theory and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Duffy, J.
(1997, March). Literacy, immigrants, and the struggle for “our town”: Competing rhetorics of community in a Wisconsin city. Paper presented to the 1997 American Educational Researchers Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
9.
Dyson, A.
(1993). The social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Dyson, A.
(1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Farr, M.
(2000). Literacy and religion: Reading, writing, and gender among Mexican women in Chicago. In P. Griffin, J. K. Peyton, W. Wolfram, & R. Fasold (Eds.), Language in action: New studies of language in society (pp. 139-154). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12.
Farr, M.
(in press). Rancheros in Chicagoacan: Language ideology and identity in a Mexican transnational community.
13.
Flower, L.
(1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14.
Flower, L.
(1996). Literate action. In L. Z. Bloom, D. A. Daiker, & E. M. White (Eds.), Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change (pp. 249-260). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
15.
Haas, C.
(1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Herndl, C.
, Fennel, B., & C. R. Miller (1991). Understanding failures in organizational discourse. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 279-305). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17.
McNamee, G. D.
(1992, April). The voices of community change. Paper presented at the 1992 Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18.
Miller, C.
(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
19.
Miller, T.
(1997). The formation of college English: Rhetoric and belles lettres in the British cultural provinces. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
20.
Myers, G.
(1991). Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 45-75). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
21.
Palmer, J.
(1992, April). The rhetoric of negotiation: Professional writing at Apple Computer, Inc. Paper presented at the 1992 Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
22.
Schriver, K.
(1992, April). Collaboration in professional writing: The cognition of a social process. Paper presented at the 1992 Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
23.
Witte, S. P.
(1992). Context, text, and intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
