Fluency in Writing

Abstract

This study explores the relation between fluency in writing and linguistic experience and provides information about the processes involved in written text composition. The authors conducted a think-aloud protocol study with native speakers of English who were learning French or German. Analysis reveals that as the writer's experience with the language increases, fluency (as measured by words written per minute) increases, the average length of strings of words proposed between pauses or revision episodes increases, the number of revision episodes decreases, and more of the words that are proposed as candidate text get accepted. To account for these results, the authors propose a model of written language production and hypothesize that the effect of linguistic experience on written fluency is mediated primarily by two internal processes called the translator and the reviser.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley.

Chase, W. G. , & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.

Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126.

Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore , D. Kempler , & W.S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85-101). New York: Academic Press.

Friedlander, A. C. (1989). The writer stumbles: Some constraints on composing in English as a second language. (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 11A.

Gathercole, S. E. , & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hall, C. (1990). Managing the complexity of revising across languages. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 43-60.

Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new model of cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Jones, S. (1985). Problems with monitor use in second language composing. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing-process problems (pp. 96-118). New York: Guilford.

11.

Kaufer, D. S. , Hayes, J. R. , & Flower, L. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 121-140.

12.

Lay, N. D. (1982). Composing processes of adult ESL learners: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 406-411.

13.

McCutchen, D. , Covill, A. , Hoyne, S. H. , & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256-266.

14.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-96.

15.

Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Porte, G. (1996). When writing fails: How academic context and past learning experiences shape revision. System, 24, 107-116.

17.

Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning, 37, 439-468.

18.

Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.

19.

Siegel, S. , & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparamentric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Towell, R. , Hawkins, R. , & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84-119.

21.

Wolfe-Quintero, K. , Inagaki, S. , & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity (Technical Report #17). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.