A Research Note on the Dimensionality of Daly and Miller's Writing Apprehension Scale

Abstract

Writing apprehension (WA) has been identified as an important construct for understanding the factors that influence student development of writing skills. Although the 1975 Daly and Miller scale has dominated the WA investigation, psychometric research has been limited to the identification of question groupings within the measure. All but the 1983 study by Boozer, Lally, and Stacks have presented the WA questions in the order specified on the original scale even though no theoretical basis for the ordering was provided. It is possible that items presented in the same order may consistently produce similar factors because an ordering effect exists rather than separate dimensions. The current study employs factor analysis and comparability analysis to investigate the impact of item order on the number of factors and the underlying factor structure stability of the WA construct. Results indicate that the randomized item factor structure was comparable with the original item order factor structure.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett, K. , & Rhodes, S. C. (1988). Writing apprehension and writing intensity in business and industry. Journal of Business Communication, 25, 25-31.

Bickel, P.J. , & Doksum, K. A. (1977). Mathematical statistics. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

Boozer, R. W. , Lally, T. P. , & Stacks, D. W. (1983). Written communication apprehension: What is it and how can it be measured? In S. Bruno (Ed.), ABCA proceedings: New directions in communication research (pp. 3-26). Houston, TX: American Business Communication Association.

Burgoon, J. K. , & Hale, J. L. (1983). Research note on the dimensions of communication reticence. Communication Quarterly, 31, 238-248.

Charney, D. A. , Newman, J. H. , & Palmquist, M. (1995). “I'm just no good at writing”: Epistemological style and attitudes toward writing. Written Communication, 12, 298-329.

Clarke, C. T. (1991). Rationale and development of a scale to measure computer-mediated communication apprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-04, A1129.

Daly, J. A. (1978). Writing apprehension and writing intensity in business and industry. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 10-14.

Daly, J. A. , & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 242-248.

Everett, J. E. , & Entrekin, L. V. (1980). Factor comparability and the advantages of multiple group factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 165-180.

10.

Flaherty, L. M. , Pearce, K. J. , & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Internet and face-to-face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46, 250-268.

11.

Hartman, K. , Neuwirth, C. M. , Kiesler, S. , Sproull, L. , Cochran, C. , Palmquist, M. , & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79-113.

12.

Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response. Written Communication, 8, 509-532.

13.

Mabrito, M. (1992). Computer-mediated communication and high-apprehensive writers: Rethinking the collaborative process. Bulletin, 16, 26-30.

14.

Penley, L. E. , Alexander, E. R. , Jernigan, I. E. , & Henwood, C. I. (1991). Communication abilities of managers: The relationship to performance. Journal of Management, 17, 57-76.

15.

Reed, W. M. (1990). The effects of computer-based writing instruction and mode of discourse on writing performance and writer anxieties. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 211-221.

16.

Reinsch, N. L., Jr. (1985). Technology aversion (with implications for education and training). Office Systems Research Journal, 4, 9-20.

17.

Riffe, D. , & Stacks, D. W. (1988). Dimensions of writing communication apprehension among mass communication students. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 384-391.

18.

Scott, C. R. , & Rockwell, S. C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education, 46, 44-62.

19.

Shaver, J. P. (1990). Reliability and validity of measures of attitudes toward writing and toward writing with the computer. Written Communication, 7, 375-392.

20.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley.

21.

Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.