Ethnic and gender differences in classroom conversational styles are explored by comparing student involvement in face-to-face and computer-mediated discussions. The quantity of participation in these two environments is triangulated with student perceptions of the conversations in three undergraduate composition classrooms. White males participated more frequently than other groups in the face-to-face setting, and White women appeared to benefit more than other groups from conversations held in the computer-mediated setting. However, these gender-differentiated participation patterns did not apply to the discourse patterns of Hispanic males and females. Unlike their White female peers, the Hispanic women in this study participated frequently in the face-to-face conversations, spoke more than Hispanic males, and generally disliked the computer-mediated conversations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bump, J.
(1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 49-65.
2.
Castañeda, A.
, James, R. L., & Robbins, W. (1974). The educational needs of minority groups. Lincoln, NE: Professional Educators Publications.
3.
Cooper, M. M.
, & Selfe, C. L. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-869.
4.
Cromwell, R. E.
, & Ruiz, R. A. (1979). The myth of macho dominance in decision making within Mexican and Chicano families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1, 355-373.
5.
Cromwell, V. L.
, & Cromwell, R. E. (1978). Perceived dominance in decision-making and conflict resolution among Anglo, Black and Chicano couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 749-759.
6.
Eakins, B.
, & Eakins, G. (1978). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. Paper presented at the Sociology of the Languages of American Women, Las Cruces, NM.
7.
Edelsky, C.
(1981). Who's got the floor?Language Society, 10, 383-421.
8.
Epstein, C. F.
(1973). Positive effects of the multiple negative: Explaining the success of Black professional women. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 912-935.
9.
Faigley, L.
(1990). Subverting the electronic notebook: Teaching writing using net-worked computers. In D. A. Daiker & M. Morenberg (Eds.), The writing teacher as researcher: Essays in the theory and practice of class-based research (pp. 290-311). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
10.
Faigley, L.
(1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
Fishman, P.
(1983). Interaction: The work women do. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 89-101). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
12.
French, J.
, & French, P. (1984). Gender imbalances in the primary classroom: An interactional account. Educational Research, 26, 127-135.
13.
Grossman, H.
(1984). Educating Hispanic students: Cultural implications for instruction, classroom management, counseling and assessment. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
14.
Haraway, D.
(1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women. New York: Routledge.
15.
Hartman, K.
, Neuwirth, C. M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write. Written Communication, 8, 79-113.
16.
Hawisher, G. E.
, & Selfe, C. L. (1992, Summer). Voices in college classrooms: The dynamics of electronic discussion. The Quarterly, 14, 24-28.
17.
Henley, N.
, & Kramarae, C. (1994). Gender, power, and miscommunication. In C. Roman, S. Juhasz, & C. Miller (Eds.), The women and language debate: A sourcebook (pp. 383-406). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18.
Herring, S. C.
(1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication [Online], 3(2). Available: http://www.cios.org/getfile\HERRING_V3N293
19.
Hershey, M. R.
(1978). Racial differences in sex-role identities and sex stereotyping: Evidence against a common assumption. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 583-596.
20.
hooks, b.
(1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking Black. Boston: South End.
21.
James, D.
, & Clarke, S. (1993). Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 231-280). New York: Oxford University Press.
Karp, D. A.
, & Yoels, W. C. (1976). The college classroom: Some observations on the meaning of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, 60, 421-439.
24.
Kochman, T.
(1981). Black and White styles in conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Kramarae, C.
, & Taylor, H. J. (1993). Women and men on electronic networks. In H. J. Taylor, C. Kramarae, & M. Ebben (Eds.), Women, information technology and scholarship colloquium (1991-1992) (pp. 52-61). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
26.
Kramarae, C.
, & Treichler, P. (1990). Power relationships in the classroom. In S. Gabriel & I. Smithson (Eds.), Gender in the classroom: Power and pedagogy (pp. 41-59). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
27.
Kreemers, M.
(1990). Sharing authority on a synchronous network: The case for riding the beast. Computers and Composition, 7, 33-44.
28.
Latour, T.
(1987). Language and power: Issues in classroom interaction. Women and Language, 10, 29-32.
29.
Leet-Pellegrini, H. M.
(1980). Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 97-104). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
30.
Lorde, A.
(1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing.
31.
Melville, M. B.
(Ed.). (1980). Twice a minority: Mexican-American women. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
32.
Moraga, C.
, & Anzaldua, G. (Eds.). (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Watertown, MA: Persephone.
33.
Morine-Dershimer, G.
, Tenenberg, M., & Shuy, R. (1980). Participant perspectives of classroom discourse: Final report (ERIC Accession No. ED 210 103, NIE Grant NIE-G-78-0161). Hayward: California State University Hayward Research Foundation.
34.
Redd, T. M.
, & Massey, V. W. (1997). Race on the superhighway: How e-mail affects African American student writers. JAC, 17, 245-266.
35.
Rickly, R.
(1999). The gender gap in computers and composition research: Must boys be boys?Computers and Composition, 16, 121-140.
36.
Romano, S.
(1993). The egalitarianism narrative: Whose story? Which yardstick?Computers & Composition, 10(3), 5-28.
37.
Sadker, D.
, & Sadker, M. (1985). Is the O.K. classroom O.K.?Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 358-361.
38.
Sadker, M.
, & Sadker, D. (1985, March). Sexism in the schoolroom of the '80s. Psychology Today, 54-57.
39.
Secor, M.
, & Charney, D. (Eds.). (1992). Constructing rhetorical education. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
40.
Selfe, C.
(1992). Technology as a catalyst for educational reform in English classes: Computer-supported writer's conferences. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing rhetorical education (pp. 6-25). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
41.
Selfe, C.
, & Meyer, P. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-192.
42.
Spender, D.
(1982). Invisible women: The schooling scandal. London: Wheaton.
43.
Swann, J.
, & Graddol, D. (1988). Gender inequalities in classroom talk. English Education, 22, 48-65.
44.
Tannen, D.
(1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Weis, L.
, & Fine, M. (Eds.). (1993). Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46.
West, C.
, & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Throne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 103-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
47.
Wolfe, J.
(1999). Why do women feel ignored? Gender differences in computer-mediated classroom interactions. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 153-166.
48.
Woods, N.
(1988). Talking shop: Sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities (pp. 141-157). New York: Longman.
49.
Zambrana, R. E.
(1994). Toward understanding the educational trajectory and socialization of Latina women. In L. Stone (Ed.), The education feminism reader (pp. 135-176). New York: Routledge.
50.
Zeff, S. B.
(1982). A cross-cultural study of Mexican American, Black American and White American women at a large urban university. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4(2), 245-261.
