Arguing that the immediate historical context of desegregation is vital to an understanding of Shirley Brice Heath's Ways with Words, this article reports on materials from the archives of Heath's research housed at the Dacus Library of Winthrop University. What emerges from reading Heath's letters and other materials at the time she was researching Ways with Words is a portrait of an ethnographer trying to negotiate existing stereotypes and raw tensions in the scholarly and public discourse on race while attempting to adhere to the tenets of the ethnographic approach of the 1970s. Taking a critical race theory approach, the article suggests that these materials indicate that Ways with Words could most fruitfully be read at this point as a story of the persistence of prejudice—a story that suggests the failure of the arguments in favor of desegregation to broker lasting reforms toward equity, and one that reveals the different and racialized meanings literacy acquires in response to historical shifts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, B.
(1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
2.
Ball, A.
, & Lardner, T. (1997). Dispositions toward language: Teacher constructs of knowledge and the Ann Arbor Black English case. College Composition and Communication, 48, 469-485.
3.
Bell, D.
(Ed.). (1980). Shades of Brown: New perspectives on school desegregation. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
Bell, D.
(1987). And we are not saved: The elusive quest for racial justice. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Bell, D.
(1992). Race, racism and American law (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
6.
Bernstein, B.
(1971). Class, codes and control (Vol. 1). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
7.
Bernstein, B.
(1975). Class, codes and control (Vol. 3). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
8.
Brandt, D.
(1992). The cognitive as the social: An ethnomethodological approach to writing process research. Written Communication, 9, 315-355.
9.
Brumley, C.
(1957, December 17). Segregation costs. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
10.
Clifford, J.
(1986). On ethnographic allegory. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 98-121). Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Crenshaw, K.
(1988). Race, reform and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1331-1387.
12.
Crenshaw, K.
, Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: The New Press.
13.
Daniell, B.
(1999). Narratives of literacy: Connecting composition to culture. College Composition and Communication, 50, 393-410.
14.
Delgado, R.
(Ed.). (1995). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15.
Diamondstone, J.
(1997). Contested relations and authoratative texts: Seventh grade students (1987) and legal professionals (1954) argue Brown v. Board of Education. Written Communication, 14, 189-220.
16.
Douglas, D.
(1994). The quest for freedom in the post-Brown South: Desegregation and White self-interest. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 70, 689-755.
17.
Dudziak, M. L.
(1992). Desegregation as a cold war imperative. In P. Finkelman (Ed.), The era of integration and civil rights 1930-1990 (pp. 133-192). New York: Garland.
18.
Fox, T.
(1990). Basic writing as cultural conflict. Journal of Education, 172, 65-83.
19.
Frankenberg, R.
(1993). White women race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
Harris, C.
(1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707-1791.
21.
Heath, S. B.
(1972). Telling tongues: Language policy in Mexico, colony to nation. New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
Heath, S. B.
(1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Heath, S. B.
(1993). The madness(es) of reading and writing ethnography. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 256-268.
24.
Henley, N.
, & Kramarae, C. (1991). Gender, power, and miscommunication. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 18-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Hymes, D.
(1968). The ethnography of speaking. In J. Fishman (Ed.), Readings in the sociology of language (pp. 99-138). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton & Co.
26.
Hymes, D.
(1977). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. London: Tavistock.
27.
Labov, W.
(1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
Lawrence, C. R.
(1980). “One more river to cross”—Recognizing the real injury in Brown: A prerequisite to shaping new remedies. In D. Bell (Ed.), Shades of Brown: New perspectives on school desegregation (pp. 48-69). New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
Lipsitz, G.
(1998). The possessive investment in whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics. Pittsburgh, PA: Temple University Press.
30.
Matsuda, M.
(1987). Looking to the bottom. Harvard Critical Race-Critical Law Review, 461, 322-399.
31.
Pratt, M. L.
(1987). Linguistic utopias. In N. Faub (Ed.), The linguistics of writing (pp. 48-66). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
32.
Prendergast, C.
(1998). Race: The absent presence in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 50, 36-53.
33.
Saville-Troike, M.
(1982). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. New York: Basic Blackwell.
34.
Stack, C.
(1974). All our kin. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Tushnet, M.
(1994). Making of civil rights law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961. New York: Oxford University Press.
