This investigation sought normative longitudinal change in student writing during college. It used a random sample of students (N=64), each of whom had produced essays at two points in their undergraduate careers, matriculation and junior year. Measures were writing features showing undergraduate change toward competent, working-world performance. From a principal-components factoring of variables used in a previous study, nine measures were selected as good representatives of nine factors—factors of independent and bound ideas, idea elaboration and substantiation, local cohesion, establishment of logical boundaries, free modification, fluency, and vocabulary. When applied to the 1st-year and junior-year writing, eight of the nine measures, including a holistic rating, recorded statistically significant change, all in the direction of workplace performance. Directions for further research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adam, J.
(1979). Sequential strategies and the separation of age, cohort, and time-of-measurement contributions to developmental data. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1309-1316.
2.
Aiken, L. R.
(1998). Human development in adulthood. New York: Plenum Press.
3.
Astin, A. W.
(1987). Assessment, value-added, and educational excellence. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain (pp. 89-107). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Astin, A. W.
(1997). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Banta, T.
(1997). Moving assessment forward: Enabling conditions and stumbling blocks. In P.J. Gray & T. W. Banta (Eds.), The campus-level impact of assessment: Progress, problems, and possibilities (pp. 79-91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Basseches, M. A.
(1987). Dialectical thinking and adult development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Bereiter, C.
(1980). Development in writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 73-93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Bolinger, D.
(1980). Language—the loaded weapon: Use and abuse of language today. London: Longman.
9.
Brewer, J.
, & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Britton, J.
, Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (pp. 11-18). London: Macmillan.
11.
Charney, D.
(1996). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. College Composition and Communication, 47, 567-593.
12.
Chiseri-Strater, E.
(1991). Academic literacies: The public and private discourse of university students. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13.
Christensen, F.
(1968). The problem of defining a mature style. English Journal, 57, 572-579.
14.
Christensen, F.
, & Christensen, B. (1967). Notes toward a new rhetoric: Nine essays for teachers. New York: Harper and Row.
15.
Cirillo, L.
, & Wapner, S. (Eds.). (1986). Value presuppositions in theories of human development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Clark, F.
(1987). Studying the longitudinal study: Do impromptu essays show changes in critical thinking of the span of college?East Lansing, MI: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 293 120)
17.
Curry, W.
, & Hager, E. (1987). Assessing general education: Trenton State College. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain (pp. 57-65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Dixon, E.
(1970). Indexes of syntactic maturity. East Lansing, MI: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 091 748)
19.
Durst, R. K.
(1984). The development of analytic writing. In A. Applebee (Ed.), Contexts for learning to write (pp. 79-102). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Eckhardt, C. D.
, & Stewart, D. H. (1979). Towards a functional taxonomy of composition. College Composition and Communication, 30, 338-342.
21.
Evans, R.
, & Ballance, C. (1980). A comparison of sentence connective recall by two populations of readers. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 324-329.
22.
Evans, R. V.
(1979). The relationship between reading and writing of syntactic structures. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 129-135.
23.
Faigley, L.
(1979). The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of Writing, 13, 197-206.
24.
Faigley, L.
(1980). Names in search of a concept: Maturity, fluency, complexity, and growth in written syntax. College Composition and Communication, 31, 291-300.
25.
Faigley, L.
, & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
26.
Freedman, A.
, & Pringle, I. (1980). Writing in the college years: Some indices of growth. College Composition and Communication, 31, 311-324.
27.
Freedman, S. W.
(1979). How characteristics of student essays influence teacher grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 328-338.
28.
Freedman, S. W.
(1984). The registers of student and professional expository writing: Influences on teachers' responses. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 334-347). New York: Guilford Press.
29.
Gebhard, A. O.
(1978). Writing quality and syntax: A transformational analysis of three prose samples. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 211-232.
30.
Gee, J. P.
(1994). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
31.
Graham, J. G. (1987). A comparison of the writing of college freshmen and college seniors with a focus on indications of cognitive development. Unpublished dissertation, University of Maryland.
32.
Grobe, C.
(1981). Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 75-85.
33.
Haas, C.
(1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11, 43-84.
34.
Hagen, L. B.
(1971). An analysis of transitional devices in student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 5, 190-201.
35.
Hake, R. L.
, & Williams, J. M. (1981). Style and its consequences: Do as I do, not as I say. College English, 5, 433-451.
36.
Halliday, M.A.K.
, & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
37.
Harman, H. H.
(1976). Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Haswell, R.
(1989). Textual research and coherence: Findings, intuition, application. College English, 51, 305-319.
39.
Haswell, R. H.
(1986). Change in undergraduate and post-graduate writing performance (Part I): Quantified findings. Pullman, WA: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 269 780)
40.
Haswell, R. H.
(1990). Change in undergraduate and post-graduate writing (Part II): Problems in interpretation. Pullman, WA: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 323 537)
41.
Haswell, R. H.
(1991). Gaining ground in college writing: Tales of development and interpretation. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.
42.
Haswell, R. H.
(1995). The WSU Portfolio Examination: First findings. Pullman: Washington State University Office of Writing Assessment.
43.
Haswell, R. H.
(1998). Multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests. Assessing Writing, 5, 89-109.
44.
Haswell, R. H.
(1999). Rubrics, prototypes, and exemplars: Categorization and systems of writing placement. Assessing Writing, 5, 231-268.
45.
Hays, J. N.
(1982). The effects of audience considerations upon the revisions of a group of basic writers and more competent junior and senior writers. East Lansing, MI: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 204 802)
46.
Henning, G.
, & Davison, F. (1987). Scalar analysis of composition ratings. Los Angeles: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 287 285)
47.
Herrington, A.
, & Curtis, M. (2000). Persons in process: Four stories of writing and personal development in college. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
48.
Hiatt, M.
(1977). The way women write. New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
Hunt, K. W.
(1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
50.
Hunt, K. W.
(1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35 (National Council of Teachers of English Research Report, No. 3).
51.
Hurtgen, J. R.
(1997). Assessment of general learning: State University of New York at Fredonia. In P. J. Gray & T. W. Banta (Eds.), The campus-level impact of assessment: Progress, problems, and possibilities (pp. 59-69). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Johnstone, B.
(1996). The linguistic individual: Self-expression in language and linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
Kaufer, D. S.
, Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 121-141.
54.
Keil, F. C.
(1987). Conceptual development and category structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 175-200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Kerek, A.
, Daiker, D. A., & Morenberg, M. (1980). Sentence combining and college composition [Monograph Supplement 1-V51]. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 1059-1157.
56.
Kitzhaber, A. R.
(1963). Themes, theories, and therapy: The teaching of writing in college. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
Light, R. J.
(1993). Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning, and student life (Harvard Assessment Seminars, 2nd Rep.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education and Kennedy School of Government.
58.
Loban, W.
(1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
59.
Loehlin, J. C.
(1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
Maimon, E. P.
, & Nodine, B. F. (1979). Measuring syntactic growth: Errors and expectations in sentence-combining practice with college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 233-244.
61.
McAdams, D. P.
(1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Morrow.
62.
Mellon, J. C.
(1979). Issues in the theory and practice of sentence combining: A twenty-year perspective. In D. A. Daiker, A. Kerek, & M. Morenberg (Eds.), Sentence combining and the teaching of writing: Selected papers from the Miami University Conference (pp. 1-38). Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
63.
Newberry, R. A.
(1967). Objective indices in the assessment of essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 403-405.
64.
North, S. M.
(1987). The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
65.
Ochs, E.
(1993). Indexing gender. In B. D. Miller (Ed.), Sex and gender hierarchies (pp. 146-169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Perkins, K.
, & Brutte, S. R. (1990). Writing: A holistic or atomistic entity?Journal of Basic Writing, 9, 75-84.
67.
Raforth, B. A.
, & Combs, W. (1983). Syntactic complexity and readers' perception of an author's credibility. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 165-169.
68.
Raforth, B. A.
, & Rubin, D. L. (1984). The impact of content and mechanics on judgments of writing quality. Written Communication, 1, 446-458.
69.
Rest, J. R.
(1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
70.
Richards, F. A.
, & Commons, M. L. (1984). Systematic, metasystematic, and cross-para-digmatic reasoning: A case for stages of reasoning beyond formal operations. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 92-119). New York: Praeger.
71.
Scharton, M.
(1989). Models of competence: Response to a scenario writing assignment. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 163-180.
72.
Schön, D. A.
(1983). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73.
Schumacher, G. M.
, Klare, G. R., Cronin, F. G., & Moses, J. D. (1984). Cognitive activities of beginning and advanced college writers: A pausal analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 169-187.
74.
Selzer, J.
, & Crowley, S. (in press). Rhetorical bodies: Toward a material rhetoric. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
75.
Spack, R.
(1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 3-62.
76.
Sternglass, M. S.
(1993). Writing development as seen through longitudinal research: A case study exemplar. Written Communication, 10, 235-261.
77.
Sternglass, M. S.
(1997). Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78.
Stewart, M. F.
(1978). Syntactic maturity from high school to university: A first look. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 37-46.
79.
Sullivan, F.J., Jr.
(1997). Calling writers' bluffs: The social production of writing ability in university placement testing. Assessing Writing, 4, 53-81.
80.
Thorndike, E. L.
, & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher's College Press.
81.
Thurstone, L. L.
(1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82.
Vandament, W. E.
(1987). A state university perspective on student outcomes assessment. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain (pp. 25-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83.
Watson, C.
(1983). Syntactic change: Writing development and rhetorical context. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 127-139). London: Wiley.
84.
White, E. M.
(1989). Developing successful college writing programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85.
Whitla, D. K.
(1980). Value added and other related matters. Report for the National Commission on Excellence in Education. East Lansing, MI: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 228 245)
86.
Williams, J. M.
(1979). Defining complexity. College English, 40, 595-609.
87.
Williams, J. M.
(1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity & grace. Dallas, TX: Scott, Foresman.
88.
Winer, B. J.
(1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
89.
Witte, S. E.
, & Davis, A. S. (1982). The stability of t-unit length in the written discourse of college freshmen: A second study. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 71-84.
90.
Witte, S. P.
, & Faigley, L. (1981). A comparison of analytic and synthetic approaches to the teaching of college writing. TWRG Research Report No. 1. Department of English, University of Texas. East Lansing, MI: Educational Data Retrieval Service. (ERIC ED 209 677)
91.
Witte, S. P.
, & Faigley, L. (1983). Evaluating college writing programs. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
92.
Witte, S. P.
, & Flach, J. F. (1994). Notes toward an assessment of advanced ability to communicate. Assessing Writing, 1, 207-246.
93.
Wolcott, W.
(1994). A longitudinal study of six developmental students' performance in reading and writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 13, 14-40.
94.
Wolk, A.
(1970). The relative importance of the final free modifier: A quantitative study. Research in the Teaching of English, 4, 59-68.
