Within complex organizations, people are members of various and sometimes conflicting subgroupings. Texts function between and across these various subgroupings to simultaneously bridge the gap between them (and thus allow joint work to be done) and yet maintain existing structures of power and territory. This study reports observations of blue-collar laboratory technicians using work orders written by engineers. It identifies work orders as a genre that both triggered and concealed the work of the technicians, allowing it to disappear into the work of the engineers. This study has implications for our understanding of the role texts play in coordinating joint work and for our understanding of what it means for texts to be perceived as generic. In particular, it emphasizes the political aspects of genre as form of social action, an aspect previous research and theory have tended to neglect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amerine, R.
, & Bilmes, J. (1990). Following instructions. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 323-335). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
2.
Barley, S. R.
, & Orr, J. E. (1997). Introduction: The neglected workforce. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings (pp. 1-19). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Bazerman, C.
(1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 296-308.
4.
Berkenkotter, C.
, & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Blakeslee, A. M.
, Cole, C. M., & Conefrey, T. (1996). Evaluating qualitative inquiry in technical and scientific communication: Toward a practical and dialogic validity. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5, 125-149.
6.
Chin, E.
(1994). Redefining “context” in research on writing. Written Communication, 11, 445-482.
7.
Cross, G. A.
(1994). Collaboration and conflict: A contextual exploration of group writing and positive emphasis. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
8.
Foucault, M.
(1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Random House.
9.
Freedman, A.
, & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In. A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 1-20). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
10.
Giddens, A.
(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
Hull, G.
(1997). Hearing other voices: A critical assessment of popular views on literacy and work. In G. Hull (Ed.), Changing work, changing workers: Critical perspectives on language, literacy and skills (pp. 3-39). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12.
Hull, G.
(1999). What's in a label? Complicating notions of the skills-poor worker. Written Communication, 16, 379-411.
13.
Latour, B.
(1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Law, J.
(1994). Organizing modernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
15.
Marvin, C.
(1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electrical communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Miller, C. R.
(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
17.
Mukerji, C.
(1996). The collective construction of scientific genius. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 257-278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Pare, A.
(1993). Discourse regulation and the production of knowledge. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 111-123). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
19.
Sauer, B.
(1998). Embodied knowledge: The textual representation of embodied sensory information in a dynamic and uncertain material environment. Written Communication, 15, 131-169.
20.
Schryer, C.
(1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10, 200-234.
21.
Shapin, S.
(1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77, 554-563.
22.
Smart, G.
(1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank's response to its executives' expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23.
Sullivan, F. J.
(1997). Dysfunctional workers, functional texts: The transformation of work in institutional procedure manuals. Written Communication, 14, 313-359.
24.
Swales, J.
(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Vincenti, W. G.
(1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
Whalley, P.
, & Barley, S. R. (1997). Technical work in the division of labor: Stalking the wily anomaly. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings (pp. 23-52). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Winsor, D. A.
(1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Winsor, D. A.
(1998). Rhetorical practices in technical work. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, 343-370.
29.
Zuboff, S.
(1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
