Rhetorical studies of genre have investigated the complex relationships between a range of genre activities and their social, historical, and institutional contexts. However, the temporal dimensions of these contexts require further specification and explicit examination. This article offers a first step toward conceptualizing the temporal dimensions of rhetorical contexts and considering the interplay between those dimensions and genre activity. First, the author reviews how temporality has figured in rhetorical studies of genre through the notions of kairos and temporal exigence. She then presents two models of time, “clock time” and “process time,” as a means for representing the temporal dimensions of rhetorical contexts and genre activity. Finally, the author examines the interplay between these temporal models and genre by analyzing a nurse practitioner's communicative interaction with two patients. By conceptualizing and examining the relationship between time and genre, this article adds to our understanding of genre as situated social action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, P.
(1995). Medical talk and medical work: The liturgy of the clinic. London: Sage.
2.
Bazerman, C.
(1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental research article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
Bazerman, C.
(1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
4.
Beck, C. S.
, & Ragan, S. L. (1992). Negotiating interpersonal and medical talk: Frame shifts in the gynaecologic exam. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(1/2), 47-61.
5.
Beck, C. S.
, & Ragan, S. L. (1995). The impact of relational activities on the accomplishment of practitioner and patient goals in the gynecological examination. In G. L. Kreps & D. O'Hair (Eds.), Communication and health outcomes (pp. 73-104). New York: Hampton.
6.
Berkenkotter, C.
, & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Berkenkotter, C.
, Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
8.
Berkenkotter, C.
, Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1991). Social contexts and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in academic and other professional communities (pp. 191-215). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Bitzer, L.
(1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
10.
Black, E.
(1978). Rhetorical criticism: A study in method. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11.
Bourdieu, P.
(1963). The attitude of the Algerian peasant toward time. In J. Pitt-Rivers (Ed.), Mediterranean countrymen: Essays in the social anthropology of the Mediterranean (pp. 55-72). Paris: Mouton.
12.
Campbell, K. K.
, & Jamieson, K. H. (1978). Form and genre in rhetorical criticism: An introduction. In K. K. Campbell & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action (pp. 9-32). Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association.
13.
Chan, P.D.
(1993). Current clinic strategies: Diagnostic history and physical exam. Fountain Valley, CA: Current Clinic Strategies Publishing International.
14.
Davies, K.
(1990). Women, time and the weaving of the strands of everyday life. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
15.
Devitt, A.
(1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and function. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in academic and other professional communities (pp. 336-357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Drass, K. A.
(1988). Discourse and occupational perspective: A comparison of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Discourse Processes, 11, 163-181.
17.
Durkheim, E.
(1915). The elementary forms of the religious life (J. W. Swain, Trans.). New York: Free Press.
18.
Engeström, Y.
(1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity: The case of primary care medical practice. In G. Saloman (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 64-193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Fisher, S.
(1993). Doctor talk/patient talk: How treatment decisions are negotiated in doctor patient communication. In A. D. Todd & S. Fisher (Eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication (2nd ed., pp. 31-48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Fisher, S.
(1995). Nursing wounds: Nurse practitioners/doctors/women patients/and the negotiation of meaning. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21.
Ford, L.
(1982). Nurse practitioners: History of a new idea and predictions for the furture. In L. H. Aiken (Ed.), Nursing in the 1980s: Crises, opportunities, challenges (pp. 231-248). Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
22.
Ford, L.
, & Silver, H. (1967, September). The expanded role of the nurse in child care. Nursing Outlook, pp. 44-45.
23.
Frankel, R. M.
(1984). From sentence to sequence: Understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Processes, 7, 135-170.
24.
Frankel, R. M.
(1990). Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters. In G. Psathas & R. Frankel (Eds.), Interactional competence (pp. 231-262). New York: Irvington.
25.
Frankenberg, R.
(1988). “Your time or mine?” An anthropological view of the tragic temporal contradictions of biomedical practice. In M. Young & T. Schuller (Eds.), The rhythms of society (pp. 118-153). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
26.
Freadman, A.
(1994). Anyone for tennis? In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 43-66). London: Taylor & Francis.
27.
Freedman, A.
, & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 1-20). London: Taylor & Francis.
28.
Frye, N.
(1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Giddens, A.
(1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.
30.
Giltrow, J.
(1994). Genre and the pragmatic concept of background knowledge. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 155-178). London: Taylor & Francis.
31.
Glaser, B.
, & Strauss, A. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine.
32.
Glaser, B. G.
, & Strauss, A. L. (1965-1966). Temporal aspects of dying as a non-scheduled status passage. American Journal of Sociology, 71, 48-59.
33.
Harrell, J.
, & Linkugel, W. A. (1978). On rhetorical genre: An organizing perspective. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 11, 262-281.
34.
Heidegger, M.
(1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
35.
Jefferson, G.
(1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346-369). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Kinneavy, J.
(1986). Kairos: A neglected concept in classical rhetoric. In J. Dietz Moss (Ed.), Rhetoric and praxis: The contribution of classical rhetoric to practical reasoning (pp. 79-165). Washington, DC: Catholic University Press.
37.
Lakoff, G.
, & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Landes, D. S.
(1983). Revolution in time: Clocks and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, UK: Belkap.
39.
Lewis, C. E.
(1982). Nurse practitioners and the physician surplus. In L. H. Aiken (Ed.), Nursing in the 1980s: Crises, opportunities, challenges (pp. 249-267). Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
40.
Little, M.
(1982). Conflict and negotiation in a new role: The family nurse practitioner. In J. A. Roth (Ed.), Research in the sociology of health care: Changing structure of health service occupations (Vol. 1, pp. 31-59). Greenwich: JAI.
41.
Miller, C.
(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
42.
Miller, C.
(1992). Kairos in the rhetoric of science. In S. Witte, S. Nakadate, & R. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays in honor of James Kinneavy (pp. 310-327). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
43.
Mishler, E.
(1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
Nowotny, H.
(1975). Time structuring and time measurement: On the interrelation between timekeepers and social time. In J. T. Fraser & N. Lawrence (Eds.), The study of time II: Proceedings of the second conference of the International Society for the Study of Time (pp. 325-339). New York: Springer-Verlag.
45.
Nowotny, H.
(1986). The public and private uses of time. In L. Balbo & H. Nowotny (Eds.), Time to care in tomorrow's welfare systems: The Nordic experience and the Italian case (pp. 11-17). Vienna: European Center for Social Welfare Training and Research.
46.
Ochs, E.
, & Jacoby, S. (1997). Down to the wire: The cultural clock, physicists and the discourse of consensus. Language in Society, 26, 479-505.
47.
Pare, A.
, & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 146-154). London: Taylor & Francis.
48.
Poulakos, J.
(1983). Toward a Sophistic definition of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 16(1), 35-48.
49.
Reverby, S.
(1987). Ordered to care: The dilemma of American nursing, 1850-1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Roth, J. A.
(1963). Timetables: Structuring the passage of time in hospital treatment and other careers. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
51.
Schryer, C. F.
(1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10, 200-234.
52.
Schryer, C. F.
(1994). The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 105-123). London: Taylor & Francis.
53.
Schutz, A.
(1962). Collected papers (Vol. 1). The Hague, the Netherlands: Nijhoff.
54.
Silverman, D.
(1987). Communication and medical practice: Social relations in the clinic. London: Sage.
55.
Simons, H. W.
(1978). “Genre-alizing” about rhetoric: A scientific approach. In K. K. Campbell & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action (pp. 33-50). Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association.
56.
Strauss, A.
, Fagerhaught, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. (1985). Social organization of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
ten Have, P.
(1989). The consultation as genre. In B. Torode (Ed.), Text and talk as social practice: Discourse and difference in speech and writing (pp. 115-135). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
58.
ten Have, P.
(1991). Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor patient interaction. In D. H. Zimmerman & D. Boden (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 138-163). Berkeley: University of California Press.
59.
Thompson, E. P.
(1967). Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism. Past and Present, 38, 56-97.
60.
Todd, A. D.
, & Fisher, S. (Eds.). (1993). The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
61.
West, C.
(1984). Routine complications: Troubles talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
62.
West, C.
(1993). Ask me no question...: An analysis of queries and replies in physician patient dialogues. In A. D. Todd & S. Fisher (Eds.), The social organization of doctorpatient communication (2nd ed., pp. 127-157). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63.
Whorf, B. L.
(1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
Woolgar, S.
(1988). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. Human Studies, 11, 171-200.
65.
Yates, J.
, & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
66.
Young, M.
(1988). The metronomic society: Natural rhythms and human timetables. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Zerubavel, E.
(1979). Patterns of time in hospital life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Zerubavel, E.
(1981). Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Zimmerman, E. N.
(1994). On definition and rhetorical genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 125-132). London: Taylor & Francis.
