The issues of authentic context and authoritative ethos are explored through a study of a graduate student learning to write for mathematics within the context of an English for academic purposes (EAP) course. The student faced conflicts about audience, purpose, and content knowledge as she was required to write math texts within what she perceived was an inauthentic context, an English as a second language (ESL) course. She questioned the purpose of the writing tasks as well as why an ESL instructor was teaching her to write for math, and she addressed the conflicts by writing for the instructor's discourse community and expectations, rather than her own, to earn a grade for the course. The text the student created was thus inauthentic within her own discourse community and lacked her voice of authority. These findings question the validity of EAP courses and raise several issues, especially in terms of the transferability of skills from EAP to content courses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ash, A.
, & Gross, R. (1994). Generalized reciprocity laws: A context for Wiles's achievement. Unpublished manuscript.
2.
Belcher, D.
(1995). Writing critically across the curriculum. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 135-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
Belcher, D.
, & Braine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Braine, G.
(1995). Writing in the natural sciences and engineering. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 113-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
Bridgeman, B.
, & Carlson, S. (1983). Survey of academic writing tasks required of graduate and undergraduate foreign students. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6.
Cadman, K.
(1997). Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity?English for Specific Purposes, 16, 3-14.
7.
Casanave, C. P.
(1995). Local interactions: Constructing texts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Connor, U.
, & Mayberry, S. (1996). Learning discipline-specific academic writing: A case study of a Finnish graduate student in the United States. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 231-253). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9.
Frodesen, J.
(1995). Negotiating the syllabus: A learning-centered, interactive approach to ESL graduate writing course design. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 331-350). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Gale, X. L.
(1994). Conversing across cultural boundaries: Rewriting “self.”Journal of Advanced Composition, 14, 457-462.
11.
Halmos, P. R.
(1970). How to write mathematics. Enseignement Math, 2(16), 123-152.
12.
Johns, A.
(1991). Interpreting an English competency exam: The frustrations of an ESL science student. Written Communication, 8, 379-401.
13.
Johns, A.
(1995). Teaching classroom and authentic genres: Initiating students into academic cultures and discourses. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 277-291). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Johns, A.
(1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Leki, I.
(1995a). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 235-260.
16.
Leki, I.
(1995b). Good writing: I know it when I see it. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 23-46). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17.
Leki, I.
, & Carson, J. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 81-101.
18.
Leki, I.
, & Carson, J. (1997). “Completely different worlds”: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 39-69.
19.
Riazi, A.
(1997). Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 105-137.
20.
Rouzer, J.
(1993). Epistemological optimism and the teaching of ESL to Chinese. The Ohio TESOL Newsletter, 17, 8-9.
21.
Shen, F.
(1989). The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition. CCC, 40, 459-466.
22.
Silva, T.
, Reichelt, M., & Lax-Farr, J. (1994). Writing instruction for ESL graduate students: Examining issues and raising questions. ELT Journal, 48, 197-204.
23.
Spack, R.
(1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go?TESOL Quarterly, 22, 29-51.
24.
Spack, R.
(1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 3-62.
25.
Swales, J. M.
(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
