A 2 x 2 x 2 between-subjects design was employed to examine the relationship among status differentials, status stability, and intergroup social competition. The three independent variables were the ethnic background of subjects (Anglo-American/Mexican American), manipulated status rank (high status/low status), and status stability (stable status/unstable status). The dependent variable was social competition defined as in-group bias/out-group discrimination as measured by Taffel's matrices. Fifty-two Mexican American and 42 Anglo-American subjects participated in this study. They were asked to rate a bogus ethnic in-group and out-group on the quality of their solutions to a problem-solving task. The results indicated that stable high-status Anglo-Americans exhibited social competition against the Mexican American out-group whereas stable low-status Anglo-Americans showed slight favoritism toward this out-group. Furthermore, unstable Anglo-Americans, both low and high statuses, displayed social competition against Mexican Americans. Finally, the results showed that Mexican Americans, regardless of their status rank or status stability, exhibited social competition against the Anglo-American outgroup. Thesefindings are believed to be a result of the real-world minority status of Mexican Americans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrera, M.
(1979). Race and class in the Southwest: A theory of racial inequality. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
2.
Billig, M.
, & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-51.
3.
Bohon, L. M.
, Singer, R., & Santos, S. J. (1993). The effects of real-world status and manipulated status on the self-esteem and social competition of Anglo-Americans and MexicanAmericans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 63-79.
4.
Branthwaite, A.
, & Jones, J. (1975). Fairness and discrimination: English versus Welsh. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 323-328.
5.
Brewer, M. B.
(1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal group situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
6.
Brewer, M. B.
, & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitude: East Africa evidence. New York: Halsted.
7.
Brown, R. J.
, & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
8.
Commins, B.
, & Lockwood, J. (1979). The effects of status differ;ences, favored treatment and equity on intergroup comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 281-289.
9.
Doise, W.
, & Sinclair, A. (1973). The categorization process in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 145-157.
10.
Ellemers, N.
, van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influences of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
11.
Espinoza, J. A.
, & Garza, R. T. (1985). Social group salience and interethnic cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 380-392.
12.
Farley, J. E.
(1982). Majority-minority relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Garza, R. T.
, Romero, G. J., Cox, B. G., & Ramirez, M. (1982). Biculturalism, locus of control, and leader behavior in ethnically mixed small groups. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 12(3), 237-253.
14.
Garza, R. T.
, & Santos, S. J. (1991). Ingroup-outgroup balance and interdependent interethnic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 124-137.
15.
Giles, H.
, Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-325). London: Academic Press.
16.
Hogg, M. A.
, & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York: Routledge.
17.
McWilliams, C.
(1990). North from Mexico: The Spanish speaking people of the United States. New York: Praeger.
18.
Messick, D. M.
, & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
19.
Ng, H. S.
(1986). Biases in reward allocation resulting from personal status, group status, and allocation procedure. Australian Journal of Psychology, 37, 251-266.
20.
Ramirez, A. C. (1984). Intergroup and intragroup social comparison preferences of Chicanos and Anglos: A test of Tajfel's theory of the social psychology of intergroup relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
21.
Rosenbaum, R. J.
(1981). Mexicano resistance in the Southwest: The sacred right of self-pres- ervation. Austin: University of Texas Press.
22.
Sachdev, I.
, & Bourhis, R. Y (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.
23.
Santos, S. J.
, Garza, R. T., & Bohon, L. M. (1990). Perceptions of intergroup relations: A comparison of Anglo-American and Mexican American university students. In S. Chang (Ed.), Persistent inequality: Income and status differences between White and minority Americans (pp. 283-302). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
24.
SAS Institute Inc.
(1989). SAT/STAT user guide, Version 6 (Vol. 1, 4th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
25.
Sherif, M.
(1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26.
Sherif, M.
, Harvey, O. J.,White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers' cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
27.
Tajfel, H.
(1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 77-98). New York and London: Academic Press.
28.
Tajfel, H.
(1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Tajfel, H.
, Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 150-177.
30.
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
31.
Turner, J. C.
(1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34.
32.
Turner, J. C.
(1978). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favoritism. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 235-250). London: Academic Press.
33.
Turner, J. C.
(1980). Fairness of discrimination in intergroup behaviour? A reply to Branthwaite, Doyle, and Lightbown. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 131-147.
34.
Turner, J. C.
(1983). Some comments on... "The measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm."European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351-367.
35.
Turner, J. C.
, & Brown, R. J. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201-234). London: Academic Press.
36.
Wagley, C.
, & Harris, M. (1967). Minorities in the New World. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
Wagner, U.
, Lampen, L., & Syllwasschy, J. (1986). Ingroup inferiority, social identity, and outgroup devaluation in a modified minimal group study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 15-23.
38.
Ward, C.
, & Hewstone, M. (1985). Ethnicity, language, and intergroup relations in Malaysia and Singapore: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 271-296.
