The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between strength of ethnic identity and perceived group vitality. Mexican Americans in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area perceived English andAnglos as more vital than Spanish and Mexican Americans. Ethnic identity had a significant influence on perceived ingroup vitality but not on perceived outgroup vitality. Respondents who strongly identified their ethnic group perceived their group's vitality to be higher than did those who identified less strongly with their ethnic group. First language did not influence vitality perceptons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D.
, & Hogg, M. (1987). Language attitudes, frames of reference, and social identity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 201-212.
2.
Allard, R.
, & Landry, R. (in press). Subjective ethnolinguistic vitality: A comparison of two measures. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.
3.
Bourhis, R. Y.
, Giles, H., & Rosenthal, D. (1981). Notes on the construction of a "subjective vitality questionnaire" for ethnolinguistic groups. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2, 145-155.
4.
Bourhis, R. Y.
, & Sachdev, I. (1984). Vitality perceptions and language attitudes: Some Canadian data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 97-126.
5.
Brewer, M.
(1979). Ingroup bias and the minimal group situation. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
6.
Departnent of Economic Security
. (n.d.). Hispanics in Transition. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
7.
Gallois, C.
, & Pittam J. (1991, May). Ethnolinguisticvitality inmulticulturaltmonolingualAustralia. Paper presented at the Intrnational Communication Association Convention, Chicago.
8.
Giles, H.
, Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup and relations, (pp. 307-348). London: Academic Press.
9.
Giles, H.
, & Johnson, P. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In J. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behavior, (pp. 199-243). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Giles, H.
, & Johnson, P. (1987). Etnolinguistic identity theory: Asocial psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69-99.
11.
Giles, H.RosenthaL D.
, & Young, L (1985). Perceived ethnolinguistic vitality: The Anglo-and Greek-Austalian setting. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 253-269.
12.
Gudykunst, W.
, Tmg-Toomey, S., Schmidt, K., & Hall, B. (1989). Language and intergroup communication. In M. Asante & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication, (pp. 145-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Hispanic Policy Development Project
. (1990). The Hispanic almanac (2nd ed.). New York: Author.
14.
Hogg, M. A.
, Joyce, N., & Abrams, D. (1984). Diglossia in Switzerland? A social identity analysis of speaker evaluations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 185-196.
15.
Kraemer, R.
(1992). Ethnolinguistic vitality perceptions in Israel in the wake of the Intifada. Joumal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13, 482-503.
16.
Kraemer, R.
, & Olshtain, E. (1989). Perceived ethnolinguistic vitality and language attitudes: The Israeli setting. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 10, 197-212.
17.
Kristiansen, T.
, Harwood, J., & Giles, H. (1991). Ethnolinguistic vitality in "the Danish capital of America."Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 12, 421-448.
18.
Labrie, N.
, & Clement, R. (1986). Ethnolinguistic vitality, self-confidence and second language proficiency: An investigation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, 269-282.
19.
Louw, J.
, Louw-Potgieter, J., Bokhorst, F., & Patel, C. (1990). Subjective vitality ratings of three Indian languages in South Africa. South African Journal of Linguistics, 8, 158-163.
20.
Louw-Potgieter, J.
(1991, May). Afrikaans: Language of the oppressor or language of libera- tion? Paperpresented atthe International Communication Association Convention, Chicago.
21.
Pittam, J.
, Gallois, C., & Willemyns, M. (1991). Perceived change in ethnolinguistic vitality by dominant and minority groups. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 12, 449-457.
22.
Sachdev, I.
(1991, May). The vitality of ethnolinguistic minorities in London, UK. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Chicago.
23.
Sachdev, I.
, Bourhis, R., D'Eye, J., & Phang, S.-W. (1990). Cantonese-Chinese vitality in London. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 1, 209-228.
24.
Sachdev, I.
, Bourhis, R., Phang, S.-W., & D'Eye, J. (1987). Language attitudes and vitality perceptions: Intergenerational effects amongst Chinese Canadian communities. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 287-307.
25.
Strategy Research Corporation
. (1985). PhoenixTucson Latin market study. Miami, FL: Author.
26.
Tajfel, H.
(1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Diferentiation between social groups, (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
27.
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. C. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
28.
Taylor, D. M.
, Bassili, J. N., & Aboud, F. E. (1973). Dimensions of ethnic identity in Canada. Journal of Social Psychology, 89, 185-192.
29.
Young, L.
, Giles, H., & Pierson, H. (1986). Sociopolitical change and perceived vitality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 459-469.
30.
Ytsma, J.
, Vlladot, M., & Giles, H. (in press). Ethnolinguistic vitality and ethnic identity: Some Catalan and Frisian data. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.
