A 2 x 3 factorial design was employed using ethnic background (Anglo-American and Mexican-American) as the blocking variable, and status rank (no status, low status, and high status) as the independent variable. The dependent variables were the components of self-esteem as measured by a factor analysis of the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory; and social competition, as measured by Tajfel's matrices. One hundred and thirty-two subjects rated an ethnic in-group and out-group after being told that their ethnic group was superior, inferior, or no status information. ANOVAs indicated that all subjects exhibited higher self-esteem in the high-status condition than in the low-status condition, F(2, 125) = 3.85, p = 0.02. Mexican-Americans had lower social-power self-esteem, F(2, 125) = 4.03, p = 0.02, and higher family self-esteem, F(2, 125) = 3.61, p = 0.03, than Anglo-Americans. A MANOVA indicated that all subjects competed most in the high-status condition, F(2, 105) = 10.469, p = 0.002, and thatMexican-Amenrcans were more competitive overall than Anglo-Americans, F(1, 106) = 3.604, p = 0.03.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Billig, M.
, & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-51.
2.
Bohon, L. M. (1990). Self-esteem: A theoretical and quantitative exploration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
3.
Branthwaite, A.
, & Jones, J. E. (1975). Fairness and discrimination: English vs. Welsh. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 323-338.
4.
Brewer, M. B.
(1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
5.
Brewer, M. B.
, & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: EastAfrica evidence. New York: Halstead.
6.
Brown, D.
, Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 445-453.
7.
Commins, B.
, & Lockwood, J. (1979). The effects of status differences, favored treatment, and equity on intergroup comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 281-289.
8.
Cooley, C. H.
(1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
9.
Coopersmith, S.
(1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
Doise, W.
, & Sinclair, A. (1973). The categorization process in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 145-157.
12.
Epstein, S.
(1973). The self-concept revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404-416.
13.
Festinger, L.
(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
14.
Garza, R. T.
, & Herringer, L. G. (1986). Social identity: A multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 299-308.
15.
Garza, R. T.
, Romero, J. G., Cox, J. B., & Ramirez, M. (1982). Biculturalism, locus of control, and leader behavior in ethnically mixed small groups. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 12, 237-253.
16.
Garza, R. T.
, & Santos, S. J. (1991). Ingroup-outgroup balance and interdependent inter-ethnic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 124-137.
17.
Gergen, K. J.
(1971). The concept of self. New York: Holt.
18.
Guzman, L. P. (1976). Puerto Rican self-esteem and the importance of social context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
19.
Lemyre, L.
, & Smith, P. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 660-670.
20.
Marsh, H. W.
(1987). The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 17-39.
21.
Marsh, H. W.
, Cairns, L., Relich, J., Barnes, J., & Debus, R. L. (1984). The relationship between dimensions of self-attribution and dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Educational Measurement, 76, 3-32.
22.
Marsh, H. W.
, Relich, J. D., & Smith, I. A. (1983). Self-concept: The construct validity interpretations based upon the SDO. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173-187.
23.
Marsh, H. W.
, & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-125.
24.
Mead, G. H.
(1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Oaks, P. J.
, & Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive?European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301.
26.
Phinney, J. S.
(1991). Ethnic identity and self-esteem: A review and integration. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 13, 193-208.
27.
Ramirez, M., III
. (1983). Psychology of theAmericans: Mestizo perspectives on personality and mental health. New York: Pergamon.
28.
Ramirez, M., III
, & Castaneda, A. (1974). Cultural democracy bicognitive development, and education. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Ramirez, M., III
, & Price-Williams, D. (1971). The relationship of culture to education attainment. Houston, TX: Rice University, Center for Research in Social Change and Economic Development.
30.
Rosenberg, M.
(1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
31.
Sachdev, I.
, & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 277-293.
32.
Santos, S. J., Garza, R. T., & Bohon, L. M. (1992). Status differentials, status legitimacy, and social competition amongAnglo-Americans and Mexican-Americans. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33.
Santos, S. J.
, Garza, R. T., & Bohon-Hock, L. M. (1990). Perceptions of intergroup relations: A comparison of Anglo and Mexican American university students. In S. Cheng (Ed.), Income and status differences between white and minority Americans (pp. 283-302). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellon.
34.
Shavelson, R. J.
, & Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 3-17.
35.
Tajfel, H.
(1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
36.
Tajfel, H.
, Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorizations and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 150-177.
37.
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
38.
Turner, J. C.
, & Brown, R. J. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
39.
Wagley, C.
, & Harris, M. (1967). Minorities in the new world. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
Wagner, U.
, Lampen, L., & Syllwasschy, J. (1986). In-group inferiority, social identity, and out-group devaluation in a modified minimal group study. British Journal of SocialPsychology, 25, 15-23.
41.
Wylie, R. C.
(1974). The self-concept (Vol. 1). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
42.
Wylie, R. C.
(1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
