The purpose of this study was to address three theoretical assumptions in an examination of the Spanish and English language proficiency and academic achievement of second-and third-grade English and Spanish speakers who were enrolled in a bilinguallimmersion program. Findings provided support for these three assumptions: (a) High levels of proficiency in the two languages willfacilitate academic achievement; (b) there are two types of language proficiency, academic and communicative, and the extent to which one is proficient in these two types may vary; and (c) there is transfer of content across languages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cummins, J.
(1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222-251.
2.
Cummins, J.
(1987). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and metalinguistic development. In P. Homel, M. Palij, & D. Aaronson (Eds.), Childhood bilingualism: Aspects of linguistic, cognitive and social development (pp. 57-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Hakuta, K.
(1986). Mirror ofLanguage. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Homel, P.
, Palij, M., & Aaronson, D. (Eds.). (1987). Childhood bilingualism: Aspects of linguistic cognitive and social development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Lindholm, K. J. (1989a). The Washington Elementary School bilingual immersion program: Student progress after three years of implementation. Unpublished report prepared for Washington Elementary School, San Jose Unified School District.
6.
Lindholm, K. J. (1989b). The WindsorElementarySchool bilingual imnmersion program: Student progress after three years of implementation. Unpublished report prepared for Windsor Elementary School, Windsor Union School District.
7.
Lindholm, K. J.
(1990). Bilingual immersion education: Criteria for program development. In A. M. Padilla, H. H. Fairchild, & C. Valadez (Eds.), Bilingual education: Issues and strategies (pp. 91-105). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Lindholm, K. J.
(in press). Two-way bilingual/immersion education: Theory, conceptual issues, and pedagogical implications. In R. V. Padilla & A. Benavides (Eds.), Critical perspectives on bilingual education research. Tucson, AZ: Bilingual Review/Press.
9.
Lindholm, K. J.
, & Fairchild, H. H. (1989). Evaluation of an "exemplary" bilingual immersion program (Tech. Rep. No. 13). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Language Education and Research.
10.
Lindholm, K. J.
, & Fairchild, H. H. (1990). First year evaluation of an elementary school bilingual immersion program. In A. M. Padilla, H. H. Fairchild, & C. Valadez (Eds.), Bilingual education: Issues and strategies (pp. 126-136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
National Commission on Excellence in Education
. (1983). A nation at risk. The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
12.
Toukomaa, P.
, & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1977). The intensive teaching of the mother tongue to migrant children of preschool age and children in the lower level of comprehensive school. Helsinki: Finnish National Commission for UNESCO.
