The voting behavior of Mexican Americans is compared to that of Anglos on several referenda issues in one city. The referenda votes focus on several issues that theory suggests are central to understanding contemporaryAmerican urban politics: economic development and human services, and governmental structure. The analysis brings together issues of ethnicity, public policy, and governmental structure. The contention that economic development is almost universally popular is not strongly supported by the findings. This is a significant finding relative to an influential theory, one that has not been extensively tested. Another significant finding is the apparent substantial difference between Mexican Americans and Anglos regarding some major urban public policy issues, such as economic development and human services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banfield, E.
, & Wilson, J. O. (1964). Public regardingness as a value premise in voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 58, 876-887.
2.
Banfield, E.
, & Wilson, J. O. (1971). Political ethos revisited. American Political Science Review, 65, 1048-1062.
3.
Berman, D.
, & Merrill, B. D. (1976). Citizen attitudes toward municipal reform institutions: A testing of some assumptions. Western Political Quarterly, 29, 274-283.
4.
Bullock, C. S., III
, & Campbell, B. A. (1984). Racial or racist voting in the 1981 Atlanta municipal elections. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 149-164.
5.
DeLeon, R. E.
(1988). Race and politics in San Francisco. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association.
6.
Durand, R.
(1972). Ethnicity, "public regardingness," and referenda voting. MidwestJournal of Political Science, 16, 259-268.
7.
Flores, H.
(1987). Playing power politics the American way: Redevelopment policies of San Antonio and Los Angeles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Westem Political Science Association, Anaheim, CA.
8.
de la Garza, R.
, & Weaver, J. (1985). Chicano and Anglo public policy perspectives in San Antonio. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 576-586.
9.
Hero, R. E.
(1986a). Mexican Americans and urban politics: A consideration of governmental structure and policy. Aztlan: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 17, 131-147.
10.
Hero, R. E.
(1986b). Understanding urban governmental structures: An analysis controlling for the influence of state law. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 16, 133-140.
11.
Hero, R. E. (1988). Hispanic political representation-incorporation and governmental responsiveness: An examination in two Colorado cities. Unpublished manuscript.
12.
Langbein, L. I.
, & Lichtman, A. J. (1978). Ecological inference. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Lineberry, R.
, & Fowler, E. (1967). Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review, 61, 701-717.
14.
Lopez, M. M.
(1986). Patterns of interethnic residential segregation in the urban southwest. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 50-63.
15.
Lovrich, N.
(1974). Differing priorities in an urban electorate: Service preferences amongAnglo, Black and Mexican American voters. Social Science Quarterly, 55, 534-547.
16.
Lyons, W.
(1977). Urban structures and policy: Reassessing additive assumptions of reform. Political Methodology, 4, 213-226.
17.
Lyons, W.
(1978). Reform and response in American cities: Structure and policy reconsidered. Social Science Quarterly, 59, 118-131.
18.
Moore, J.
, & Pachon, H. (1985). Hispanics in the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Morgan, D. R.
, & Pelissero, J. P. (1980). Urban policy: Does political structure matter?American Political Science Review, 74, 999-1005.
20.
Peterson, P.
(1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Peterson, P.
(1987). Analyzing developmental politics: A response to Sanders and Stone. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 540-547.
22.
Sanders, H. T.
, & Stone, C. N. (1987a). Developmental politics reconsidered. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 521-539.
23.
Sanders, H. T.
, & Stone, C. N. (1987b). Competing paradigms: A rejoinder to Peterson. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 548-551.
24.
Sharp, E. B.
(1987). Mfting on citywide propositions: Further tests of competing explanations. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 233-248.
25.
Wolfinger, R.
, & Field, J. O. (1966). Political ethos and the structure of city government. American Political Science Review, 60, 306-326.
26.
Wong, K.
(1988). Economic constraint and political choice in urban policymaking. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 1-18.
