Positive Speech Accommodation in the Language of Mexican American Bilinguals: Are Women Really More Sensitive?

Abstract

Recent work on women's use of language has presented two conflicting views: (a) that women use speech patterns that are unique and exclusive to them, and (b) that women's use of language varies (as it does for males) according to the situation, context, and interlocutors involved. This paper explores positive speech accommodation (the attempt to adopt the speech patterns of an interlocutor) in code-switching styles by Mexican American males and females in response to the speech of three male speakers. According to the first view of language presented above, women would be more likely to accommodate to the speech of male speakers. The principal hypothesis of this paper is that, given a situation where no rewards are expected and no gain is to be found by exhibiting convergent behavior, there will be no difference in speech accommodation by male and female Mexican American bilinguals. Data presented support the second of the two positions presented above.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyle, M. , Salter, V. , Nicholson, H. , Williams, M. , & Burgess, P.

The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals

British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 1970, 9, 222-231.

Black, J.W. Loudness of speaking: I. The effect of heard stimuli on spoken responses. Joint Project No. 2, Contract N 7onr-411, T.O.I., U.S Naval School of Aviation Medicine and Research, Pensacola, Ohio, 1949.

Giles, H.

Accent mobility: A model and some data

Anthropological Linguistics, 1973, 15, 87-105.

Giles, H. , & Powesland, P.F. Speech style and social evaluation . New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Giles, H. , Taylor, O.M. , & Bourhis, R.Y.

Toward a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data

Language in Society , 1973 , 2, 177-192.

Jaffe, J. , & Feldstein, S. Rhythms of dialogue New York: Academic Press, 1970.

Labov. W. Sociolinguistic patterns Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.

Matarazzo, J.D. , Weins, A.N. , Matarazzo, R.G. , & Saslow, G. Speech and silence behavior in clinical psychotherapy and its laboratory correlates In J. Schier, H. Hunt, J. D. Matarazzo, & C. Savage (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy: Volume 3. Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association, 1968.

Ray, M.L. , & Webb, E.J.

Speech duration effects in the Kennedy news conference

Science , 1966, 5, 899-941.

10.

Rosenthal, R. , Archer, D. , DiMatteo, R. , Koivumaki, J.H. , & Rogers, P.L.

Body talk and tone of voice: The language without words

Psychology Today, 1974, 8, 64-68.

11.

Thorne, B. , & Henley, N. Language and sex Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.

12.

Trudgill, P. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwick In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.

13.

Valdes-Fallis, G.

Code switching among bilingual Mexican American women: Toward an understanding of sex-related language alternation

International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1978,17, 65-72. (a)

14.

Valdes-Fallis, G.

Code switching and language dominance: Some initial findings

General Linguistics, 1978,18, 90-104. (b)

15.

Webb, J.T. Interview synchrony: An investigation of two speech rate measures in the automated standardized interview In A. W Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication. Proceedings of a research conference on the interview. Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press, 1970.