This study examined prejudicial attitudes toward immigrant defendants who vary on legal status, country of origin, and ethnicity. Three hundred twenty mock juror participants read a trial transcript that varied defendants’ immigration status (documented or undocumented), defendant country of origin (Canada or Mexico), and defendant race/ethnicity (Caucasian or Latino). Dependent measures included verdict, sentencing, culpability ratings, and trait assessments. European American mock jurors found undocumented, Latino immigrants from Mexico guilty significantly more often, more culpable, and rated this defendant more negatively on various trait measures in comparison with all other conditions. Latino mock jurors did not demonstrate ingroup favoritism or outgroup bias. This study examines aversive racism as a factor of this bias. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
BergJ. A. (2010). Race, class, gender, and social space: Using an intersectional approach to study immigration attitudes. The Sociological Quarterly, 51, 278-302. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01172.x
3.
BrighamJ. C. (1971). Ethnic stereotypes. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 15-38.
4.
CowanG.MartinezL.MendiolaS. (1997). Predictors of attitudes toward illegal Latino immigrants. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 403-415.
5.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (1989). Aversive racism and selection decisions. Psychological Science, 11, 315-319.
6.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 1-51.
7.
EspinozaR. K. E. (2010). Juror bias in the U.S. legal system: Examining problems and solutions. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic.
8.
EspinozaR. K. E.Willis-EsquedaC. W. (2008). Defendant and defense attorney characteristics and their effects on juror decision making and prejudice against Mexican Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 364-371.
9.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioS. F. (2005). Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common in-group identity model. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 615-639.
10.
GuentherK.PendazS.FortunataS. M. (2011). The impact of intersecting dimensions of inequality and identity on the racial status of Eastern African immigrants. Sociological Forum, 26, 98-120.
KitanoH. H.SueS. (1973). The model minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00069.x
13.
KruhI. P.FrickP. J.ClementsC. B. (2005). Historical and personality correlates to the violence patterns of juveniles tried as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 69-96.
14.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751-768. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005
15.
LeeY. T.OttatiV. (2002). Attitudes toward to American immigration policy: The role of ingroup-outgroup bias, economic concern, and obedience to law. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 617-634.
16.
LinM. H.KwanV. Y.CheungA.FiskeS. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34-47. doi:10.1177/0146167204271320
17.
MartinezR.LeeM. T. (2000). Immigration and crime. In LaFreeG.BursikR. J.Sr.ShortJ. F.TaylorR. B. (Eds.), Criminal justice 2000. The nature of crime: Continuity and change (Vol. 1, pp. 485-524). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18.
MazzellaR.FeingoldA. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315-1344.
19.
MurrayK. E.MarxD. M. (2013). Attitudes toward unauthorized immigrants, authorized immigrants, and refugees. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 332-341. doi:10.1037/a0030812
20.
PasselJ. S.CohnD. V. (2011). Unauthorized immigrant population: National and state trends, 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Research Center.
21.
PerezD. A.HoschH. M.PonderB.TrejoG. C. (1993). Ethnicity of defendants and jurors as influences on jury decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1249-1262.
22.
PickelK. L.WarnerT. C.MillerT. J.BarnesZ. T. (2013). Conceptualizing defendants as minorities leads mock jurors to make biased evaluations in retracted confession cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 56-69. doi:10.1037/a0029308
ReynaC.DobriaO.WetherellG. (2013). The complexity and ambivalence of immigration attitudes: Ambivalent stereotypes predict conflicting attitudes toward immigration policies. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 342-356.
25.
ShortR. (2004). Justice, politics, and prejudice regarding immigration attitudes. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9, 193-209.
26.
ShortR.MaganaL. (2002). Political rhetoric, immigration attitudes, and contemporary prejudice: A Mexican American dilemma. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 701-712.
27.
SmithT. W.MarsdenP. V.HoutM. (2000). General Social Survey [Cumulative File] (ICPSR31521-v1). Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 2011-08-05. doi:10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1
28.
SommersS. R.EllsworthP. S. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201-229. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.201
29.
SommersS. R.EllsworthP. S. (2009). “Race salience” in juror decision-making: Misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 599-609. doi:10.1002/bsl.877
30.
TauschN.HewstoneM. (2010). Social dominance orientation attenuates stereotype change in the face of disconfirming information. Social Psychology, 41, 169-176. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000024
31.
Willis-EsquedaC. W.EspinozaR. K. E.CulhaneS. E. (2008). The effects of ethnicity, SES, crime status on juror decision making: A cross-cultural cultural examination of European American and Mexican American mock jurors. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 181-199.
