This article explores how younger members of a multigenerational social network of transnational Mexicans of ranchero background construct their ethnic identity both in offline and online contexts. By using traditional ethnography and discourse-centered online ethnography (DCOE), this study found that members of this network use four emic criteria (language, color, transnationality, and display of culture) to construct their ethnic identity as Mexican. In the online context, members use these criteria to challenge each other’s degree of Mexicanness. By challenging other members’ degree of Mexicanness, members are indirectly re-constructing their social order, not based on age and gender but based on a hierarchy that conforms to a place of influence in the network grounded in centrality, which correlates to their perceived degrees of Mexicanness. Facebook serves as a catalyst for change, as it allows members to interact in more direct ways, slowly influencing interactions carried out in offline contexts.
AuerP. (2005). A postscript: Code-switching and social identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 403-410.
3.
Barragán LópezE. (1997). Con un pie en el estribo: Formación y deslizamientos de las sociedades rancheras en la construcción del México moderno. Zamora, Spain: Colegio de Michoacán.
4.
BarthF. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
5.
BoissevainJ. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators and coalitions. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6.
BucholtzM.HallK. (2004). Language and identity. In DurantiA. (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 369-394). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
Chavez-DueñasN. Y.AdamesH. Y.OrganistaK. C. (2014). Skin-color prejudice and within-group racial discrimination historical and current impact on Latino/a populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 36, 3-26.
8.
CorneliusW. A.FitzgeraldD. S.Hernandez-DiazJ.BorgerS. (Eds.). (2009). Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A transnational community in Oaxaca and California. La Jolla: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.
9.
FarrM. (2006). Rancheros in Chicagoacán: Language and identity in a transnational community. Austin: University of Texas Press.
10.
FarrM. (2011). Urban plurilingualism: Language practices, policies, and ideologies in Chicago. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1161-1172.
11.
FoughtC. (2004). Ethnicity. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillP.Schilling-EstesN. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 444-472). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HallK.BucholtzM. (1995). Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
HolleranL. K. (2003). Mexican American youth of the Southwest borderlands: Perceptions of ethnicity, acculturation, and race. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 352-369.
15.
HymesD. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
LevittP. (2001). The transnational villagers. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
17.
Mendoza-DentonN. (2004). Language and identity. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillP.Schilling-EstesN. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 475-499). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
MilroyL. (2002). Social networks. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillP.Schilling-EstesN. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 549-572). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19.
MilroyL.WeiL. (1995). A social network approach to code-switching: The example of a bilingual community in Britain. In MilroyL.MuyskenP. (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp. 136-157). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20.
OchsE. (1992). Indexing gender. In DurantiA.GoodwinC. (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335-358). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21.
OmiM.WinantH. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
Saville-TroikeM. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
SchecterS. R.BayleyR. (1997). Language socialization practices and cultural identity: Case studies of Mexican-descent families in California and Texas. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 513-541.
24.
ShenkP. S. (2007). “I’m Mexican, remember?” Constructing ethnic identities via authenticating discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 194-220.
25.
SilversteinM. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193-229.
26.
SmithR. C. (2006). Mexican New York: Transnational lives of new immigrants. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
27.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
ZentellaA. C. (1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
