With the increasing discourse about a crime-immigration nexus and Latinos, it is critical to ascertain how the criminal justice system responds to noncitizen Latino defendants. Using federal sentencing data to investigate the role of national origin and immigration status on noncitizen Latinos’ sentencing outcomes, several findings emerge. First, national origin conditions the sentences received for Mexicans and non-Mexican Latinos. Second, immigration status perpetuates disparities among defendants within each Latino subgroup. Third, examining the aggravating factors within each immigration status category shows that national origin poses greater sentencing penalties for Mexican defendants.
Alba, R., Rumbaut, R.G., & Marotz, K. ( 2005). A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 84, 901-919.
2.
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. (n.d.). Mission statement. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.alipac.us/content-16.html
3.
Buck, B., Hobbs, M., Kaiser, A., Lang, S., Montero, D., Romines, K., et al. (2003). Immigration and immigrants: Trends in American public opinion, 1964-1999. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 12, 73-90.
4.
Chandler, C.R., & Tsai, Y. ( 2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: An analysis of data from the General Social Survey. Social Science Journal, 38, 177-188.
5.
Citrin, J., & Sides, J. ( 2008). Immigration and the imagined community in Europe and the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1258-1263.
6.
Davis, J.A., Smith, T.W., & Marsden, P.V. ( 2007). General Social Surveys, 1972-2006: [Cumulative file] [Computer file]. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer], 2007. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research/ Berkeley, CA: Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program, University of California [distributors], 2007.
7.
Demuth, S. ( 2002). The effect of citizenship status on sentencing outcomes in drug cases. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14, 271-275.
8.
Dixon, J. ( 1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157-1198.
9.
Espenshade, T.J. ( 1995). Unauthorized immigration to the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 195-216.
10.
Foster, S. ( 1997, October 8). Priest warns against bigotry in Park City . Salt Lake Tribune, D1, D3.
11.
Gitlin, A., Buendía, E., Crosland, K., & Doumbia, F. ( 2003). The production of margin and center: Welcoming-unwelcoming of immigrant students. American Educational Research Journal , 40, 91-122.
12.
Hagan, J., Levi, R., & Dinovitzer, R. (2008). The symbolic violence of the crime-immigration nexus: Migrant mythologies in the Americas. Criminology and Public Policy, 7, 95-112.
13.
Jaret, C. ( 1999). Troubled by newcomers: Anti-immigrant attitudes and action during two eras of mass immigration to the United States. Journal of American Ethnic History, 18, 9-39.
14.
Johnson, B.D., Ulmer, J.T., & Kramer, J.H. ( 2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 737-783.
15.
Keogan, K. ( 2002). A sense of place: The politics of immigration and the symbolic construction of identity in Southern California and the New York Metropolitan area. Sociological Forum, 17, 223-253.
16.
Larsen, L.J. ( 2004). The foreign-born population in the United States: 2003 . Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau .
17.
Morin, J.L. ( 2008). Latinas/os and US prisons: Trends and challenges. Latino Studies, 6, 11-34.
18.
Neal, M., & Bohon, S.A. ( 2003). The Dixie diaspora: Attitudes toward immigrants in Georgia . Sociological Spectrum, 23, 181-212.
19.
Oboler, S. ( 2008). "Viviendo en el olvido": Behind bars, Latinos and prison . Latino Studies, 6, 1-10.
20.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., and Piquero, A. ( 1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
21.
Rumbaut, R.G., Foner, N., & Gold, S.J. ( 1999). Immigration and immigration research in the United States . American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1258-1263.
22.
Rumbaut, R.G., & Ewing, W.A. ( 2007). The myth of immigrant criminality and the paradox of assimilation. Retrieved from May23, 2009, http://www.immigrationpolicy .org/images/File/specialreport/Imm%20Criminality%20(IPC).pdf
23.
Russell-Brown, K. ( 2008). The color of crime: Racial hoaxes, white fear, black protectionism, police harassment, and other macroaggressions (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
24.
Simon, R.J., & Lynch, J.P. ( 1999). A comparative assessment of public opinion toward immigrants and immigration policies. International Migration Review, 33, 455-467.
25.
Stacey, A.M., & Spohn, C. ( 2006). Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentences imposed on male and female offenders in three U.S. district courts . Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 43-73.
26.
U.S. v. Borrero-Isaza, 887 F.2d 1349, 1352 (9th Cir. 1989).
27.
U.S. v. Gomez, 797 F.2d 417 (7th Cir. 1986).
28.
U.S. v. Onwuemene, 933 F.2d 650, 651 (8th Cir. 1991).
29.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2008). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
Welch, M. ( 2007). Deadly consequences: Crime control discourse and unwelcome migrants. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 275-282.
