This article reviews the theoretical and methodological development of ethnopsychology, which is founded on the principle that distinct cultural groups share basic common beliefs and values that differentiate them psychologically from other cultural groups. The distinctness of a cultural group is rooted in a series of historical, sociocultural experiences and perceptions of oneself and the group as a whole. The development of ethnopsychology is summarized through the contributions of Rogelio Diaz-Guerrero and his early exploration of the fundamental premises and tenets that guide ethnopsychological theory and method. The contributions of other theorists, focusing on the uniqueness of bicultural/bilingual groups such as Mexican Americans, are also summarized. The author supports the application of ethnopsychological theory and method to enhance psychologists’ understanding of bilingual/bicultural groups in the United States. Specifically, she reviews current psychological assessment methods and their ethnopsychological adaptation for Mexican Americans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ardila, A.
(1995). Directions of research in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 143-150.
2.
Ardila, A.
, Rosselli, M., & Puente, A. E. (1994). Neuropsychological evaluation of the Spanish speaker. New York: Plenum.
3.
Boscan, D. C.
, Penn, N. E., Velasquez, R. J., Reimann, J., Gomez, N., Guzman, M., et al. (2000). MMPI-2 profiles of Colombian, Mexican, and Venezuelan university students. Psychological Reports, 87, 107-110.
4.
Butcher, J. N.
(1996). Translation and adaptation of the MMPI-2 for international use. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2, research and clinical applications (pp. 27-43). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
Butcher, J. N.
, & Han, K. (1996). Methods of establishing cross-cultural equivalence. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2, research and clinical applications (pp. 44-63). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Cabiya, J. L.
, Lucio, E., Chavira, D. A., Castellanos, J., Gomez, F. C., & Velasquez, R. J. (2000). Psychological Reports, 87, 266-268.
7.
Carter, R. T.
(1991). Cultural values: A review of empirical research and implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 164-170.
8.
Cervantes, R. C.
, Padilla, A. M., & Salgado de Snyder, N. (1990). Reliability and validity of the Hispanic Stress Inventory. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 76-82.
9.
Cervantes, R. C.
, Padilla, A. M., & Salgado de Snyder, N. (1991). The Hispanic Stress Inventory: A culturally relevant approach to psychosocial assessment. Psychological Assessment, 3(3), 438-447.
10.
Clark, S.
, Callahan, W. J., Lichtszajn, J., & Velasquez, R. J. (1996). MMPI performance of Central American refugees and Mexican immigrants. Psychological Reports, 79, 819-824.
11.
Costantino, G.
, Flanagan, R., & Malgady, R. G. (2001). Narrative assessments: TAT, CAT, and TEMAS. In L. A. Suzuki & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological and educational applications (pp. 217-236). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
12.
Costantino, G.
, & Malgady, R. G. (1983). Verbal fluency of Hispanic, Black and White children on TAT and TEMAS, a new thematic apperception test.Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5(2), 199-206.
13.
Costantino, G.
, & Malgady, R. G. (1999). The Tell-Me-a-Story Test: A multicultural offspring of the Thematic Apperception Test. In L. Gieser & M. I. Stein (Eds.), Evocative images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the art of projection (pp. 191-206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
Costantino, G.
, & Malgady, R. G. (2000). Multicultural and cross-cultural utility of the TEMAS (Tell-Me-a-Story) Test. In R. H. Dana (Ed.),Handbook of cross-cultural and multicultural personality assessment (pp. 481-513). Nahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Costantino, G.
, Malgady, R. G., Casullo, M. M., & Castillo, A. (1991). Cross-cultural standardization of TEMAS in three Hispanic subcultures. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 48-62.
16.
Costantino, G.
, Malgady, R. G., Colon-Malgady, G., & Bailey, J. (1993). Clinical utility of the TEMAS with nonminority children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59(3), 433-438.
17.
Costantino, G.
, Malgady, R. G., & Vazquez, C. (1981). A comparison of the Murray-TAT and a new thematic apperception test for Hispanic children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), 291-300.
18.
Dana, R. H.
(1993). Multicultural assessment perspectives for professional psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1967). Psychology of the Mexican: Culture and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
20.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1977). Culture and personality revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 285, 119-130.
21.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1982). The psychology of the historic-sociocultural premise. Spanish Language Psychology, 2, 383-410.
22.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(Ed.). (1984a). Cross-cultural and national studies in social psychology.New York: Elsevier Science.
23.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1984b). Holtzman inkblot technique (HIT) differences across Mexican, Mexican American, and Angloamerican cultures. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Measurement and personality assessment (pp. 247-259). New York: Elsevier Science.
24.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1989). Los primos y nosotros, la personalidad de los Mexicanos y los Norteamericanos: Partes uno a ocho [Our cousins and ourselves, personality of Mexicans and North-Americans: Parts one to eight]. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1990). Psicologia y sociedad, contribuciones selectas [Psychology and society, selected contributions]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 22(1), 131-160.
26.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1991). Understanding Mexicans and Americans: Cultural perspectives in conflict. New York: Plenum.
27.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1992). The need for an ethnopsychology of cognition and personality. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 29, 19-26.
28.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1993). Mexican ethnopsychology. In U. Kim & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 44-55). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Diaz-Guerrero, R.
(1995). Una aproximacion cientifica a la etnopsicologia [A scientific approximation of ethnopsychology]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 27, 359-389.
30.
Diaz-Loving, R.
(1999). The indigenisation of psychology: Birth of a new science or rekindling of an old one?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(4), 433-449.
31.
Diaz-Loving, R.
, & Andrade-Palos, P. (1984). Una escala de locus de control para ninos Mexicanos [A locus of control scale for Mexican children]. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia, 18, 21-33.
32.
Diaz-Loving, R.
, Rivera-Aragon, S., & Sanchez-Aragon, R. (2001). Rasgos instrumentals (masculinos) y expresivos (femeninos), normativos (tipicos e ideales) en Mexico [Instrumental (masculine) and expressive (feminine) attributes, norms (typical and ideal) in Mexico]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 33(2), 131-139.
33.
Figueroa, R. A.
(1989). Psychological testing of linguistic-minority students: Knowledge gaps and regulations. Exceptional Children, 56, 145-152.
34.
Flanagan, R.
, & di Guiseppi, R. (1999). Critical review of the TEMAS: A step within the development of thematic apperception instruments. Psychology in the Schools, 36(1), 21-30.
35.
Geisinger, K. F.
(1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
36.
Gomez, F. C.
, Johnson, R., Davis, Q., & Velasquez, R. J. (2000). MMPI—A performance of African and Mexican American adolescent first-time offenders. Psychological Reports, 87, 309-314.
37.
Gomez, F. C.
, Peidmont, R. L., & Fleming, M. Z. (1992). Factor analysis of the Spanish version of the WAIS: The escala de inteligencia Wechsler para adultos (EIWA). Psychological Assessment, 4, 317-321.
38.
Hall, G.C.N.
, Bansal, A., & Lopez, I. R. (1999). Ethnicity and psychopathology: A metaanalytic review of 31 years of comparative MMPI/MMPI-2 research. Psychological Assessment, 11, 186-197.
39.
Hofstede, G.
(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Holtzman, W. H.
(1979). Culture, personality development, and mental health in the Americas. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 13, 27-49.
41.
Holtzman, W. H.
, Diaz-Guerrero, R., & Swartz, J. D. (1975). Personality development in two cultures: Across-cultural longitudinal study of school children in Mexico and the United States. Austin: University of Texas Press.
42.
Kaplan, R. M.
, & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological testing. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43.
Kirkpatrick, J.
, & White, G. M. (1985). Exploring ethnopsychologies. In G. M. White & J. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), Person, self, and experience: Exploring Pacific ethnopsychologies (pp. 3-32). Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
Lucio-G.M., E.
, & Reyes-Lagunes, I. (1996). The Mexican version of the MMPI-2 in Mexico and Nicaragua: Translation, adaptation, and demonstrated equivalency. In J. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2, research and clinical applications (pp. 265-283). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
Malgady, R. G.
, Costantino, G., & Rogler, L. H. (1985). Development of a Thematic Apperception Test (TEMAS) for urban Hispanic children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(6), 986-996.
46.
Martinez, C.
(1988). Mexican-Americans. In L. Comas-Diaz & E.E.H. Griffith (Eds.), Clinical guidelines in cross-cultural mental health (pp. 182-203). New York: John Wiley.
47.
Padilla, A. M.
, Cervantes, R. C., Maldonado, M., & Garcia, R. E. (1988). Journal of Community Psychology, 16(4), 418-427.
48.
Ramirez, M.
(1983). Psychology of the Americas: Mestizo perspectives on personality and mental health. New York: Pergamon.
49.
Ramirez, M.
(1998). Multicultural/multiracial psychology: Mestizo perspectives in personality and mental health. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
50.
Sacuzzo, D. P.
, & Johnson, N. E. (1995). Traditional psychometric tests and proportionate representation: An intervention and program evaluation study. Psychological Assessment, 7, 183-194.
51.
Salgado de Snyder, V. N.
, Cervantes, R. C., & Padilla, A. M. (1990). Gender and ethnic differences in psychosocial stress and generalized distress among Hispanics. Sex Roles, 22(7/8), 441-453.
52.
Shartrand, A.
(1996). Supporting Latino families: Lessons from exemplary programs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
53.
Spielberger, C. D.
, & Diaz-Guerrero, R. (Eds.). (1983). Cross-cultural anxiety. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
54.
Triandis, H. C.
, Kurowski, L. L., Tecktiel, A., & Chan, D. (1993). Extracting the emics of diversity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 17, 217-234.
55.
U.S. Department of Commerce
, Census Bureau. (2000, February). The Hispanic population of the United States: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 2000 from http://www.census.gov/prod/2000pubs/p20-527.pdf
56.
Velasquez, R. J.
, Callahan, W. J., & Carrillo, R. (1991). MMPI differences among Mexican-American male and female psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Reports, 68, 123-127.
57.
Velasquez, R. J.
, Callahan, W. J., & Young, R. (1993). Hispanic-White MMPI comparisons: Does psychiatric diagnosis make a difference?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 528-534.
58.
Velasquez, R. J.
, & Gimenez, L. (1987). MMPI differences among three diagnostic groups of Mexican-American state hospital patients. Psychological Reports, 60, 1071-1074.
59.
Velasquez, R. J.
, Gonzales, M., Butcher, J. N., Castillo-Canez, I., Apodaca, J. X., & Chavira, D. (1997). Use of the MMPI-2 with Chicanos: Strategies for counselors. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 25, 107-120.
60.
White, G. M.
(1992). Ethnopsychology. In T. Schwartz, G. M. White, & C. Lutz (Eds.), New directions in psychological anthropology (pp. 21-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
