Debate exists regarding the extent to which Mexican-descent parent-child conversations are explanatory. Moreover, suggestions have been made that differences in the amount of explanatory conversation may be based on parents’educational background. This article reports on two studies investigating conversations between parents and children in two different contexts. Results of an observational study conducted at a children’s museum reveal that although parents with high levels of formal education used more explanations about science than did parents with lower levels of formal education, both groups engaged in causal conversations with their children. In a second study examining parents’ reports of science talk after attending family science workshops, results indicated no difference in the explanation frequency between two groups of families with different levels of formal education. Overall, the findings suggest that Mexican-descent parents across differing educational backgrounds encourage their children’s developing understanding of the scientific world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez, M.
(1999, March). Socialization of emotion language: Mothers’interaction with young children. Invited presentation at University of California, Santa Cruz Developmental Psychology Program Colloquium.
2.
Beals, D. E.
(2001).Eating and reading: Links between family conversations with preschoolers and later language and literacy. In D. K. Dickinson & P. O. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school (pp. 75-92). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
Beals, D. E.
, & Snow, C. E. (1994).“Thunder is when the angels are upstairs bowling”: Narratives and explanations at the dinner table. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 4,331-352.
4.
Brown, A. L.
(1989).Analogical learning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 349-412). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Callanan, M. A.
, Alba-Speyer, A., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2000). Linking home and school through children’s questions that followed family science workshops (Research Brief No. 8). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
6.
Callanan, M.
, & Jipson, J. L. (2001).Explanatory conversations and young children’s developing scientific literacy. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 21-49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Callanan, M. A.
, & Oakes, L. M. (1992).Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7,213-233.
8.
Callanan, M. A., Pérez-Granados, D. R., Barajas, N. H., & Goldberg, J. C. (2002). “Why” questions in Mexican-descent children’s conversations with parents. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
Carey, S.
(1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Cohen, J.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Crowley, K.
, Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001).Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education, 85,712-732.
12.
Crowley, K.
, Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001).Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12,258-261.
13.
Crowley, K.
, & Siegler, R. S. (1999).Explanation and generalization in young children’s strategy learning. Child Development, 70,304-316.
14.
Delgado-Gaitan, C.
(1994).Socializing young children in Mexican-American families: An intergenerational perspective. In P. Greenfield & R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 55-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Farver, J.A.M.
(1999).Activity setting analysis: A model for examining the role of culture in development. In A. Göncü (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 99-127). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Gallimore, R.
, Goldenberg, C. N., & Weisner, T. S. (1993).The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21,537-559.
17.
Gjerde, P. F.
, & Onishi, M. (2002).Selves, cultures, and nations: The psychological representation of “The Japanese” in the era of globalization. Human Development, 43,216-226.
18.
Gopnik, A.
(1993).How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 16,1-14, 29-113.
19.
Heath, S. B.
(1986).Sociocultural contexts of language development. In Bilingual Education Office (Ed.), Beyond language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority students (pp. 73-142). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
20.
Inagaki, K.
, & Hatano, G. (1996).Young children’s recognition of commonalities between animals and plants. Child Development, 67,2823-2840.
21.
Keil, F. C.
(1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Kotovsky, L.
, & Gentner, D. (1996).Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67,2797-2822.
23.
Laosa, L. M.
(1980).Maternal teaching strategies in Chicano and Anglo-American families: The influence of culture and education on maternal behavior. Child Development, 51,759-765.
24.
McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V.
, & Sigel, I. E. (1995).Parental beliefs. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 3: Status and social conditions of parenting (pp. 333-358). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Miller, S. A.
(1988).Parents’ beliefs about children’s cognitive development. Child Development, 59,259-285.
26.
Moll, L. C.
, & Gonzalez, N. (1994).Lessons from research with language-minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26,439-456.
27.
Moreno, R. P.
(1991).Maternal teaching of preschool children in minority and low-status families: A critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6,395-410.
28.
Pan, B. A.
, Perlmann, R. Y., & Snow, C. E. (2000).Food for thought: Dinner table as a context for observing parent-child discourse. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 205-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Phinney, J. S.
(1996).Understanding ethnic diversity: The role of ethnic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40,143-152.
30.
Renshaw, P. D.
(1992).Reflecting on the experimental context: Parents’ interpretations of the education motive during teaching episodes. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s development within social context: Vol. 1. Metatheory and theory (pp. 53-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Richman, A. L.
, Miller, P. M., & LeVine, R. A. (1992).Cultural and educational variations in maternal responsiveness. Developmental Psychology, 4,614-621.
32.
Rogoff, B.
, Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (8, Serial No. 179).
33.
Snow, C. E.
, & Kurland, B. (1996).Sticking to the point: Talk about magnets as a context for engaging in scientific discourse. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 189-220). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Strauss, C.
, & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Tenenbaum, H. R.
, & Leaper, C. (1997).Mothers’and fathers’questions to their child in Mexican-descent families: Moderators of cognitive demand during play. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19,318-332.
36.
Tenenbaum, H. R.
, & Leaper, C. (1998).Mothers’ and fathers’ responses to their Mexican-descent child: A sequential analysis. First Language, 18,129-147.
37.
Tenenbaum, H. R., Snow, C. E., Roach, K. A., & Kurland, B. (2002). Talking and reading science:Genderanddevelopmentaldifferencesinlow-incomechildren.Unpublishedmanuscript.
38.
Vasquez, O.
, Pease-Alvarez, L., & Shannon, S. (1994). Pushing boundaries: Language and culture in a Mexicano community. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Villanueva, I.
(1991, April). The “norms of language use” in the discourse of Chicano families. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
40.
Wellman, H. M.
(1988).Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 523-573). New York: John Wiley.
41.
Wellman, H. M.
, Hickling, A. K., & Schult, C. A. (1997).Young children’s psychological, physical, and biological explanations. In H. M. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children’s reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena (New Directions for Child Development No. 75) (pp. 7-25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Wertsch, J. V.
, Minick, N., & Arns, F. J. (1984).The creation of context in joint problem-solving. In J. Lave, B. Rogoff (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 151-171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
