Effects of interviewer gender and age on disclosure of sexual behavior by 573 California Latino men and their female partners were analyzed,adjusting for interviewee clustering within interviewer. Larger standard errors in adjusted than in naive/unadjusted regression models demonstrated the existence of interviewer effects on responding,but these were only attributable to interviewer gender or age for a small number of specific topics. Men interviewed by women reported fewer sexual partners and were less likely to report sex with strangers than men interviewed by men; they were more likely to report sex with prostitutes or other men to older than to younger interviewers. Women were less likely to report oral sex to older interviewers. Sexual behavior surveys should evaluate and, where detected, adjust for fixed interviewer effects and should routinely report interviewer numbers, panel sizes, and other characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Biggar, R. J.
, & Melbye, M. (1992). Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: A method to examine potential biases. American Journal of Public Health, 82(11), 1506-1512.
2.
Bradburn, N.
, Sudman, S., Blair, E., & Stocking, C. (1978). Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 221-234.
3.
Catania, J. A.
, Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339-362.
4.
Catania, J. A.
, Turner, H., Pierce, R. C., Golden, E., Stocking, C., Binson, D., & Mast, K. (1993). Response bias in surveys of AIDS-related sexual behavior. In D. G. Ostrow & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), Methodological issues on AIDS behavioral research (pp. 133-162). New York: Plenum.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Fact sheet-HIV/AIDS among Hispanics in the United States. Available from ftp://ftp.cdcnpin.org/FactSheets/Hispanics.pdf
6.
Cleary, P. D.
, Mechanic, D., & Weiss, N. (1981). The effect of interviewer characteristics on responses to a mental health interview. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 183-193.
7.
Darrow, W.
, Thomas, P., Rogers, M., Auerbach, D., & Curran, J. (1986). Sex of interviewer, place or interview, and responses of homosexual men to sensitive questions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(1), 79-88.
8.
DeLamater, J.
(1974). Methodological issues in the study of premarital sexuality. Sociological Methods and Research, 3(1), 30-61.
9.
Dijkstra, W.
(1983). How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects. Quality and Quantity, 17, 179-187.
10.
Fendrich, M.
, Johnson, R., Shaligram, C., & Wislar, J. (1999). The impact of interviewer characteristics on drug use reporting by male juvenile arrestees. Journal of Drug Issues, 29(1), 37-58.
11.
Ford, K.
, & Norris, A. (1997). Effects of interviewer age on reporting of sexual and reproductive behavior of Hispanic and African American youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 369-376.
12.
Fowler, F. J.
(1992). Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Fowler, F. J.
, & Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized survey interviewing: Minimizing interviewer-related error. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Groves, R.
(1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Groves, R. M.
, & Magilavy, L. J. (1986). Measuring and explaining interviewer effects in centralized telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 251-266.
16.
Johnson, T. P.
, Hougland, J. G., Jr., & Moore, R. W. (1991). Sex differences in reporting sensitive behavior: A comparison of interview methods. Sex Roles, 24(11/12), 669-680.
17.
Johnson, T. P.
, & Moore, R. W. (1993). Gender interactions between interviewer and survey respondents: Issues of pornography and community standards. Sex Roles, 28(5/6), 243-261.
18.
Johnson, T. P.
, & Parsons, J. A. (1994). Interviewer effects on self-reported substance use among homeless persons. Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 83-93.
19.
Localio, A. R.
, Berlin, J. A., Ten Have T. R., & Kimmel, S. E. (2001). Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: An overview. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 112-123.
20.
Office of AIDS
. (1998, April). California HIV/AIDS update (Vol. 2). Sacramento: California Department of Health Services, Office of AIDS.
21.
Sabogal, F.
, Faigeles, B., & Catania, J. A. (1993). Multiple sexual partners among Hispanics in high risk cities: Data from the National AIDS Behavioral Surveys. Family Planning Perspectives, 25(6), 257-262.
22.
Smith, L. B.
, Adler, N. E., & Tschann, J. (1999). Underreporting sensitive behaviors: The case of young women’s willingness to report abortion. Health Psychology, 18(1), 37-43.
23.
Sorian, R., & Kates, J. (2000). The state of HIV/AIDS epidemic in America: The Kaiser Family Foundation capital hill briefing series on HIV/AIDS. Available from http://www.kff.org
24.
Sudman, S.
, & Bradburn, N. (1983). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Weinhardt, L. S.
, Forsyth, A. D., Carey, M. P., Jaworski, B. C., & Durant, L. E. (1998). Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 155-180.
