The purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine the lived experiences of 15 students from the Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary who were trained to use inductive people-helping questions in human interactions. Participants shared their perceptions of the usefulness of inductive questioning in interpersonal helping. Key themes emerged, including improved listening skills, enhanced empathy, a greater appreciation for questioning as a tool, recognition of the importance of being present, and an understanding of people as Living texts.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
2.
BauerD. R.TrainaR. A. (2014). Inductive Bible study: A comprehensive guide to the practice of hermeneutics. Baker Publishing Group.
3.
BloomB. S. (1965). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. Longmans.
4.
BoisenA. T. (1960). Out of the Depths: an autobiographical study of mental disorder and religious experience. Harper & Brothers.
5.
BoydR. (2023). Allowing the final form full-voice: Inductive Bible study method. Religions, 14(9), 1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091128
6.
ClarkV. P.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Pearson.
7.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
8.
DamiZ. A.AlexanderF.ManafeY. Y. (2020). Jesus’ questions in the Gospel of Matthew: Promoting critical thinking skills. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 18(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739891320971295
FuhrR. A.KostenbergerA. J. (2016). Inductive Bible study: Observation, interpretation, and application through the lenses of history, literature, and theology. B&HAcademic.
11.
GerkinC. V. (1984). The living human document. Abingdon Press.
12.
GuloA. (2022). Some notes on the idea of living human document and its implications for pastoral praxis. Eduvest–Journal of Universal Studies, 2(1), 140–149. 10.59188/eduvest.v2i1.338
13.
HayakawaS.MiyaharaK. (2025). Empathy through listening. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 11(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2024.12
HeflinH. (2021). That’s a good question: Inquiry as a pedagogical strategy of Jesus in Matthew. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 19(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913211009524
16.
HillC. E. (2020). Helping skills: Facilitating exploration, insight, and action (5th ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000147-000
17.
JohnsonR. J. (2025). Inductive people helping: Integrating inductive Bible study and the process model of helping. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing Theory and Professional Practice Through Scholarly and Reflective Publications, 79(1–4), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423050251327094
18.
KomildjanovnaN. M. (2024). The power of open-ended question and its crucial role in discovering unanticipated answers, gathering additional details and important insights. Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research, 3(10), 33–45. https://webofjournals.com/index.php/1/article/view/1881.
19.
LarsenT. M.EndoB. H.YeeA. T.DoT.LoS. M. (2022). Probing internal assumptions of the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 21(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0170
20.
OrlowskiE. W.FriedlanderM.MoeyaertM. (2025). Using deliberate practice for inner skills to enhance therapist in-session mindfulness and presence. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2025.2551710
21.
OverholserJ. C.BealeE. (2023). The art and science behind Socratic questioning and guided discovery: A research review. Psychotherapy Research, 33(7), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2183154
22.
TustonjaM.StipicD. T.SkokoI.CuljakA.VegarA. (2024). Active listening–a model of empathetic communication in the helping professions. Medicina Academica Integrativa, 1(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.47960/3029-3316.2024.1.1.42
23.
van ManenM.van ManenM. (2021). Doing phenomenological research and writing. Qualitative Health Research, 31(6), 1069–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211003058
24.
WilliamsE. N. (2023). The use of questions in psychotherapy: A review of research on immediate outcomes. Psychotherapy, 60(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000471
25.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
