Facebook is the most popular social networking site in the world and is used by many churches. This study seeks to discover the type of Facebook posts that most contribute to the perceived spiritual formation of church attenders as defined by typical church mission statements. A broad range of church attenders who use Facebook (N = 161) completed an online survey focusing on their church's Facebook page. They indicated the degree to which they believe various types of their church's Facebook posts contributed to their spiritual formation, specifically, their relationship with God, their relationship with fellow believers, their personal spiritual growth, and their involvement in ministry or service. They also indicated what type of posts they would like to see more frequently from their church. An exploratory analysis found that posts that had greater cognitive content (specifically, live broadcasts, video recordings, announcements, and devotionals) were perceived to contribute more to church attenders’ spiritual formation than did posts with less cognitive content (humorous memes, photos, inspirational quotations, and external links). Confirming these results, participants also expressed a preference for their church to make more posts with high cognitive content than posts with low cognitive content. These results lead to several applications of how churches can better use Facebook to contribute to their mission.
AlegreI.Berbegal-MirabentJ.GuerreroA.Mas-MachucaM. (2018). The real mission of the mission statement: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.82
BartonR. H.ChandlerD. J.TanS. Y.TenelshofJ.WilhoitJ. C. (2014). Spiritual formation in the church. Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care, 7(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/193979091400700212
4.
BrubakerP. J., & HaighM. M. (2017). The religious Facebook experience: Uses and gratifications of faith-based content. Social Media Society, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117703723
5.
CaersR.De FeyterT.De CouckM.StoughT.VignaC.Du BoisC. (2013). Facebook: A literature review. New Media & Society, 15(6), 982–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813488061
6.
ChowT. S., & WanH. Y. (2017). Is there any ‘Facebook depression’? Exploring the moderating roles of neuroticism, Facebook social comparison and envy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119 (2017), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.032
CovarrubiasA.DunaetzD. R.DykesW. (2021). Innovativeness and church commitment: What innovations were most important during the pandemic?Great Commission Research Journal, 13(2), 49–70.
9.
DruckerP. F. (1973). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. Harper Business.
10.
DunaetzD. R. (2019a). Cultural tightness-looseness: Its nature and missiological applications. Missiology, 47(4), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829619875940
11.
DunaetzD. R. (2019b). Evangelism, social media, and the mum effect. Evangelical Review of Theology, 43(2), 138–151.
12.
DunaetzD. R.WongD. T.DraperA. L.SalsmanJ. P. (2022). Barriers to leading small groups among generation Z and younger millennials: An exploratory factor analysis and implications for recruitment and training. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 19(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F07398913211018482
HarringtonJ. R., & GelfandM. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111
15.
HefferT.GoodM.DalyO.MacDonellE.WilloughbyT. (2019). The longitudinal association between social-media use and depressive symptoms among adolescents and young adults: An empirical reply to Twenge et al. (2018). Clinical Psychological Science, 7(3), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618812727
16.
HoggM. A., & TerryD. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
17.
KallestadW. P. (1996). Entertainment evangelism: Taking the church public. Abingdon Press.
18.
LeeY. J. (2018). Is your church “liked” on Facebook? Social media use of Christian congregations in the United States. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21291
PhuB., & GowA. J. (2019). Facebook use and its association with subjective happiness and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 92 (2019), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.020
21.
PoindexterD. O. (2003). A history of entertainment-education, 1958–2000. In SinghalA.CodyM. J.RogersE. M.SabidoM. (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change (pp. 43–60). Routledge.
22.
PopperK. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
ReineckeL.VordererP.KnopK. (2014). Entertainment 2.0? The role of intrinsic and extrinsic need satisfaction for the enjoyment of Facebook use. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12099
25.
RyanT.ChesterA.ReeceJ.XenosS. (2014). The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.016
26.
RynsburgerM., & LamportM. A. (2008). All the rage: How small groups are really educating Christian adults part 1: Assessing small group ministry practice: A review of the literature. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 5(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/073989130800500110
27.
SellersK. (2021). Storytelling the gospel in Hungary: Zooming in on an ancient mode of communication. Great Commission Research Journal, 13(2), 77–84.
28.
SinghalA.CodyM. J.RogersE. M.SabidoM. (Eds.) (2003). Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice. Routledge.
29.
Stallworth WilliamsL. (2008). The mission statement: A corporate reporting tool with a past, present, and future. Journal of Business Communication, 45(2), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943607313989
30.
StanovichK. E. (2013). How to think straight about psychology. Pearson.
31.
SumallaE. C.OchoaC.BlancoI. (2009). Posttraumatic growth in cancer: Reality or illusion?Clinical Psychology Review, 29(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.09.006
32.
SwalesJ. M., & RogersP. S. (1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002005
33.
TwengeJ. M. (2019). More time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838244
34.
TwengeJ. M.MartinG. N.SpitzbergB. H. (2019). Trends in US adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000203
35.
WellmanJ. K.CorcoranK. E.Stockly-MeyerdirkK. (2014). “God is like a drug…”: Explaining interaction ritual chains in American megachurches. Sociological Forum, 29(3), 650–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12108
36.
WilhoitJ. C. (2008). Spiritual formation as if the church mattered: Growing in Christ through community. Baker Academic.
37.
WillardD. (2002). Renovation of the heart. NavPress.
38.
WilsonR. E.GoslingS. D.GrahamL. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904
39.
WuthnowR. (1994). “I come away stronger”: How small groups are shaping American religion. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
