This article analyzes the ways in which Jesus’ questions in Matthew’s gospel align with the categories of Bloom’s taxonomy, and how Jesus’ audience influenced the questions he asked. Results indicate Jesus asked the religious leaders higher-level questions more often than the disciples, who received a greater number of lower-level questions. These differences inform how teachers construct questions that help students learn. Recommendations are made for educators who construct questions that account for students’ preparation, students’ motivation, the value of silence, and the difficulty of questions.
AmbroseS. A.BridgesM. W.DiPietroM.LovettM. C.NormanM. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
2.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
3.
AnthonyM. J.BensonA. (2003). Exploring the history and philosophy of Christian education. Kregel.
4.
AreedaP. E. (1996). The Socratic method (SM) (Lecture at Puget Sound, 1/31/90). Harvard Law Review, 109(5), 911–922.
5.
AssalyI. R.SmadiO. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of master class textbook’s questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100–110.
6.
AvdicA.WissaU. A.HatakkaM. (2016). Socratic flipped classroom: What type of questions and tasks promote learning?Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, 41–48.
7.
BibiW.ButtM. N.RebaA. (2020). Relating teachers’ questioning techniques with students’ learning within the context of Bloom’s taxonomy. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 111–119.
8.
BrownP. C.Roediger IIIH. L.McDanielM. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Belknap Press.
9.
BruehlerB. B. (2018). Traversing Bloom’s taxonomy in an introductory scripture course. Teaching Theology of Religion, 21, 92–109.
10.
BuckleyM. J. (2016). What do you seek? The questions of Jesus as challenge and promise. Eerdmans.
11.
ChenY. (2019). Developing students’ critical thinking and discourse level writing skills through teachers’ questions: A sociocultural approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 141–162.
12.
ChickeringA. W.GamsonZ. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7. American Association for Higher Education.
13.
CooganM. D.BrettlerM. Z.NewsomC. A.PerkinsP. (2018). The new Oxford annotated Bible: New revised standard version: with the Apocrypha: an ecumenical study Bible (rev. 5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
14.
CopenhaverM. B. (2014). Jesus is the question: The 307 questions Jesus asked and the 3 he answered. Abingdon Press.
15.
CoxJ. F. (1947). Teaching God’s word. Firm Foundation Publishing.
DelićH.BećirovićS. (2016). Socratic method as an approach to teaching. European Researcher, 110(10), 511–517.
18.
DillonJ. T. (1981). To question and not to question during discussion. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 15–20.
19.
DillonJ. T. (1991). Questioning the use of questions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 163–164.
20.
EdgeF. B. (1956). Teaching for results. Broadman Press.
21.
EvansC. A. (2012). Matthew. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge University Press.
22.
FallsD. (2001). Socratic method. In AnthonyM. (Ed.), Evangelical dictionary of Christian education (p. 651). Baker Academic.
23.
FinkL. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.
24.
FranceR. T. (1985). The Gospel according to Matthew: An introduction and commentary. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. InterVarsity.
25.
FrancisE. M. (2016). Now that’s a good question: How to promote cognitive rigor through classroom questioning. ASCD.
26.
GangelK. O.HendricksH. G. (1989). The Christian educator’s handbook on teaching. Scripture Press.
27.
GersenJ. S. (2017). The Socratic method in the age of trauma. Harvard Law Review, 130(9), 2320–2347.
28.
GriggsD. L. (1974). Teaching teachers to teach: A basic manual for church teachers. Abingdon Press.
29.
GundryR. H. (2010). Commentary on the New Testament: verse-by-verse explanations with a literal translation. Hendrickson Publishers.
30.
HareD. R. A. (2009). Matthew. Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching. Westminster John Knox Press.
31.
HeflinH. (2012). Teaching Eutychus: Engaging today’s learners with passion and creativity. ACU Press.
32.
HeflinH.PlattM.RobertsK. (2014). Training and teaching methods of volunteer teachers. Christian Education Journal, 11(1), 24–32.
33.
HlinakM. (2014). The Socratic method 2.0. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 31(1), 1–20.
34.
HorneH. (1998). Jesus the teacher: Examining his expertise in education (revised and updated by Angus M. Gunn). Kregel.
35.
Ignatius. (2007). The spiritual exercises of St. Ignatius. Kessinger Publishing.
36.
JamesG.MartinezE.HerbersS. (2015). What can Jesus teach us about student engagement?Journal of Catholic Education, 19(2), 127–154.
37.
KoehnekeM. L. (1953). Various methods of teaching Bible class. Concordia Theological Monthly, 24(9), 665–676.
38.
KrathwohlD. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
39.
LeeH. A. (2015). Thinking levels of questions in Christian reading textbooks. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 24, 89–100.
40.
LeeH.RosoC. G. (2010). Jesus and Bloom: How effective was Jesus in requiring people to think critically? In LeeH., Faith-based education that constructs (pp. 71–83). Wipf & Stock.
41.
MajorD. (1997). An analysis of the teaching styles of Jesus, the Buddha and Socrates in the light of John Heron’s six category analysis of counselling interventions. Modern Believing, 28(4), 29–37.
42.
MakhloufK.AmouriL.ChaabaneN.El-HaggarN. (2020). Exam questions classification based on Bloom’s taxonomy: Approaches and techniques. 2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS), October, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS49240.2020.9257698
43.
McKeachieW. J. (2002). McKeachie’s teaching tips (11th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
44.
MelzerA. M. (2018). The educational benefits of obscurity: Pedagogical esotericism. Econ Journal Watch, 15(2), 257–289.
45.
MounceW. D.MounceR. H. (2008). The Zondervan Greek and English interlinear New Testament (NASB/NIV). Zondervan.
46.
OsborneG. R.ArnoldC. E. (2010). Matthew. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary Series, New Testament, Vol. 1. Zondervan.
47.
OsmerR. R. (1992). Teaching for faith: A guide for teachers of adult classes. Westminster/John Knox Press.
48.
PalmerP. (1984). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual journey. HarperSanFrancisco.
49.
PazmiñoR. W. (2001). God our teacher: Theological basics in Christian education. Zondervan.
50.
PeaceT. (1984). A content analysis of the questions of Jesus in relation to Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Ph.D. dissertation). Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.
RuleP. (2017). The pedagogy of Jesus in the parable of the Good Samaritan: A diacognitive analysis. Hervormde Teologiese Studies, 73(3), 1–8.
53.
SchmittD. R. (2018). The question-answered design. Concordia Journal, 44(2), 95–99.
54.
ShulmanL. (2002). Making differences: A table of learning. Change, 34(6), 36–44.
55.
WanakL. (2009). Jesus’ questions. Evangelical Review of Theology, 33(2), 167–178.
56.
WasukundiF. A. K. (2012). Pedagogy of Jesus for modern world Christian teachers. African Ecclesial Review, 54(3-4), 262–284.
57.
WillinghamD. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for your classroom. Jossey-Bass.
58.
WithrowL. R. (2020). Fostering curiosity, asking powerful questions: Lessons of a leadership coach. Journal of Religious Leadership, 19(1), 69–82.
59.
WyckoffD. C. (1968). The import of the Bloom taxonomies for religious education. Religious Education, 63(6), 478–484.
60.
YountW. R. (1996). Created to learn: A Christian teacher’s introduction to educational psychology. Broadman & Holman.
61.
ZuckR. B. (2002). Teaching as Jesus taught. Wipf & Stock.
