Early Lutheran educational reforms carried out the educational vision of Martin Luther and were consistent with his thought. Humanistic concerns deeply influenced Melanchthon's educational reforms in lands allied with Wittenberg. Melanchthon's humanism was faithful to Luther's thought. Luther, like Melanchthon, reconciled Northern Renaissance Humanism and his evangelical theology. Luther's and Melanchthon's humanism was consistent with their theology insofar as they worked from a framework that distinguished between two kinds of righteousness. Melanchthon and Luther could uphold humanistic commitments as long as they did not encroach upon the doctrine of justification.
Aguzzi-BarbagliD. (1988). Humanism and poetics. In RabilA.Jr. (Ed.), Renaissance humanism: Foundations, forms, and legacy (Vol. 3. Humanism and the disciplines). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
2.
ArandC. P. (2001). Two kinds of righteousness as a framework for law and gospel in the Apology.Lutheran Quarterly, 15(4), 417–439.
3.
ArnoldJ. (2011). The great humanists: An introduction.New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.
EstepJ. R. (2008). What makes education Christian? In EstepJ. R., AnthonyM. J., & AllisonG. R. (Eds.), A theology for Christian education (pp. 25–43). Nashville, TN.: B&H Academic.
9.
FaberR. A. (2005). Humanitas as discriminating factor in the educational writings of Erasmus and Luther.Dutch Review of Church History / Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis, 85(1), 25–37.
10.
GrimmH. J. (1973). The Reformation era, 1500–1600 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
KelleyD. R. (1988). Humanism and history. In RabilA.Jr. (Ed.), Renaissance humanism: Foundations, forms, and legacy (Vol. 3. Humanism and the disciplines).Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13.
KittelsonJ. M. (1976). Humanism and the Reformation in Germany.Central European History, 9(4), 303–322.
14.
KorcokT. (2011). Lutheran education: From Wittenberg to the future.St. Louis, MO: Concordia.
15.
KristellerP. O. (1961). Renaissance thought: The classic, scholastic, and humanist strains.New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
16.
KristellerP. O. (1988). Humanism and moral philosophy. In RabilA.Jr. (Ed.), Renaissance humanism: Foundations, forms, and legacy (Vol. 3. Humanism and the disciplines). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
LindhardtJ. (1986). Martin Luther: Knowledge and mediation in the renaissance (Vol. 29). Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.
18.
LutherM. (1919). Die letzten gedancten D M Lutheri. In D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Tischreden, Band 5, pp. 317–318). Weimar, Germany: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.
19.
LutherM. (1934). Luther an Markgraf Georg von Brandenburg. In D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Briefwechsel, Band 5, pp. 119–121). Weimar, Germany: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.
20.
LutherM. (1955). Letters: I, Vol. 48 (ShermanF., Ed.). Saint Louis, MO: Concordia.
21.
LutherM. (1957). Disputation against scholastic theology. In GrimmH. J. (Ed.), The career of the Reformer: I (Vol. 31, pp. 3–16). Philadelphia, PA: Muehlenberg Press.
22.
LutherM. (1958). Instructions for the visitors of parish pastors in Electoral Saxony. In BergendoffC. (Ed.), Church and ministry: II (Vol. 45, pp. 263–320). Philadelphia, PA: Muehlenberg Press.
23.
LutherM. (1963). Lectures on Galatians. (HansenW. A., Ed.) (Vol. 26). Saint Louis, MO: Concordia.
24.
MelanchthonP. (2000). Apology of the Augsburg Confession. In KolbR., & WengertT. J. (Eds.), The book of Concord: The confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church (pp. 107–294). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
25.
OverfieldJ. H. (1984). Humanism and Scholasticism in late medieval Germany.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
26.
RosinR. (1990). The Reformation, humanism, and education: The Wittenberg model for reform.Concordia Journal, 16(4), 301–318.
27.
RummelE. (1995). The humanist-scholastic debate in the Renaissance & Reformation.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SpitzL. W. (1988). Humanism and the Protestant Reformation. In RabilA.Jr. (Ed.), Renaissance humanism: Foundations, forms, and legacy (Vol. 3. Humanism and the disciplines).Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
SpringerC. (2007). Martin's martial: Reconsidering Luther's relationship with the classics.International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 14(1/2), 23–50.
30.
TracyJ. D. (1999). Europe's reformations, 1450–1650.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
Van't SpijkerW. (2001). Early Reformation and Scholasticism.Dutch Review of Church History/Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis, 81(3), 290–305.
32.
WrightW. J. (1975). Impact of the Reformation on Hessian education.Church History, 44(2), 182–198.
33.
WrightW. J. (1987). Evaluating the results of sixteenth century educational policy: Some Hessian data.The Sixteenth Century Journal, 18(3), 411–426.
