This article maintains that neither churches nor theological institutions alone prove adequate to accomplish the task of preparing ministers. Field education, as collaboration between church and institution, can utilize the best of both contexts to prepare “reflective practitioners.” In order for this to happen, field education must move toward the center of the curriculum rather than be relegated to the margins. This article addresses the critical areas that enable this move.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerRussell J. (1963). Some issues in pastoral education: The Yale experiment in field work. In Seventh Biennial Consultation on Seminary Field Work, (pp. 38–56). Austin, TX: Austin Presbyterian Theological School.
2.
ButterfieldJ. A., & HunterG. I. (1980). Education for supervised ministries.Newton Centre, MA: Boston Theological Institute.
3.
CollR. (1992). Supervision of ministry students.Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.
4.
DeVriesR. C. (1981). Religious experience in the Reformed tradition and its implications for field education. In BeisswengerD. F., HommesT. G., & McCartyD. (Eds.), Religious experience. Theological Field Education: A Collection of Key Resources (Vol. 3, pp. 193–197). Nashville, TN: Association for Theological Field Education.
5.
DykstraC. (1991). Reconceiving practice. In WheelerB. G., & FarleyE. (Eds.), Shifting boundaries: Contextual approaches to the structure of theological education (pp. 35–66). Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox.
6.
EganM. (1981). Religious experience in the Roman Catholic tradition and its significance for field education. In BeisswengerD. F., HommesT. G., & McCartyD. (Eds.), Religious Experience. Theological Field Education: A Collection of Key Resources (Vol. 3, pp. 179–185). Nashville, TN: Association for Theological Field Education.
7.
FeildingC. R. (1966). Education for ministry.Dayton, OH: American Association of Theological Schools.
8.
FosterFrank C. (1932). “Field Work and Its Relation to the Curriculum of Theological Seminaries.” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University. Johnson City, TN: Muse-Whitlock.
9.
HaagJ. (1981). Theological field education literature. In BeisswengerD. F., HommesT. G., & McCartyD. (Eds.), Religious Experience. Theological Field Education: A Collection of Key Resources (Vol. 3, pp. 277–285). Nashville, TN: Association for Theological Field Education.
10.
HunterG. (1977). Theological field education.Newton Centre, MA: The Boston Theological Institute.
11.
McCartyD. (1978). The supervision of ministry students.Atlanta: Home Mission Board SBC.
12.
McDanielC. (2001). Publications by members of the Association for Theological Field Education: Survey results. Theological Education, 37, 59–70.
13.
MorganCarl H. (1947). Certain basic principles of field work. In Addresses and discussions of the second conference on field work in theological education, (pp. 1–9). Philadelphia: Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary.
14.
NiebuhrR., WilliamsD. D., & GustafsonJ. M. (1957). The advancement of theological education.New York: Harper.
15.
O'GormanR., TalvacchiaK., & SmithW. M. (2001). Teaching from a community context: The role of the field educator in theological education. Theological Education, 40, 1–57.
16.
PaetzelR. W. (1981). Religious experience in the Free Church tradition and its implications for field education. In BeisswengerD. F., HommesT. G., & McCartyD. (Eds.), Religious Experience. Theological Field Education: A Collection of Key Resources (Vol. 3, pp. 187–191). Nashville, TN: Association for Theological Field Education.
17.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York: Basic Books.
18.
SeymourJ. (1981). Placement design: Defining the context for field Education. In BeisswengerD. F., HommesT. G., & McCartyD. (Eds.), Religious Experience. Theological Field Education: A Collection of Key Resources (Vol. 3, pp. 215–221). Nashville, TN: Association for Theological Field Education.
19.
WoodwardRalph L. (1947). The relation of field work to the curriculum, In Addresses and discussions of the second conference on field work in theological education, (pp. 15–19). Philadelphia: Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary.
