Over the past 30 years, literary approaches to biblical interpretation have gained precedence in many religious and literary circles. However, confusion often exists regarding what “interpreting the Bible as literature” actually means. This article explores the multifaceted nature and significance of this methodology from the Middle Ages through the mid-20th century and then focuses on trends in contemporary hermeneutics by outlining three distinct literary approaches. The article concludes by providing for Christian educators some implications of and practical recommendations for applying this methodology in practice and ministry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlterR. (1975). A literary approach to the Bible. Commentary, 60, 70–77.
2.
AlterR. (1981). The art of Biblical narrative.New York: Basic Books.
3.
AlterR., & KermodeF. (Eds.). (1987). The literary guide to the Bible.Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
4.
ArnoldM. (1875). God and the Bible. In SuperR. H. (Ed.), Complete prose works of Matthew Arnold (Vol. 7, pp. 141–398). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
5.
ArnoldM. (1880). The study of poetry. In AdamsH. (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato (pp. 596–600). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
6.
BalM. (1990). Dealing/with/women: Daughters in the book of Judges. In SchwartzR. (Ed.), The book and the text: The Bible and literary theory (pp. 16–39). Cambridge, England: Basil Blackwell.
7.
BarthesR. (1986). The rustle of language.New York: Hill and Wang.
8.
DerridaJ. (1970). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In MackseyR., & DonatoE. (Eds.), The languages of criticism and the sciences of man: The structuralist controversy (pp. 247–272). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
9.
DetweilerR., & RobbinsV. K. (1991). From new criticism to poststructuralism: Twentieth-century hermeneutics. In PrickettS. (Ed.), Reading the text: Biblical criticism and literary theory (pp. 225–80). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
10.
DukeJ. (1977). Schleiermacher: On hermeneutics. In KimmerleH. (Ed.), Hermeneutics: The handwritten manuscripts (pp. 1–15). Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.
11.
EngebretsonK. (1999). Intention in religious education curriculum: The achievement of learning outcomes. Journal of Christian Education, 42(2), 17–25.
12.
FerretterL. (2003). Towards a Christian literary theory.Houndmills, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
FewellD. N., & GunnD. M. (1991). Compromising redemption: Relating characters in the book of Ruth.Louisville, KY: Westminster Press.
GabelJ. B., WheelerC. B., & YorkA. D. (Eds.). (2000). The Bible as literature: An introduction (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
JacobsA. (1991). Deconstruction. In WalhoutC., & RykenL. (Eds.), Contemporary literary theory: A Christian appraisal (pp. 172–98). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
17.
JasperD. (1999). Literary readings of the Bible: Trends in modern criticism. In JasperD., & PrickettS. (Eds.), The Bible and literature: A reader (pp. 44–64). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
18.
JasperD., & PrickettS. (Eds.). (1999). The Bible and literature: A reader.Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
19.
JeffreyD. L. (1996). People of the book.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
KaiserW. C.Jr. (2005, November 10). The reliability and relevance of the Old Testament for contemporary living. Lecture presented for the Faith & Thought Lecture Series, Northwestern College, St. Paul, MN.
22.
KaiserW. C.Jr., & SilvaM. (1994). An introduction to biblical hermeneutics: The search for meaning.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
23.
LeggP. M. (2002). Understanding Bible study curricula: Theology, hermeneutics, and education in the congregation. Interpretation56(4), 398–409.
24.
LongmanT.III (1999). Literary approaches to Old Testament study. In BakerD., & ArnoldB. (Eds.), The face of Old Testament studies: A survey of contemporary approaches (pp. 97–115). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
25.
LowthR. (1969). Lectures on the sacred poetry of the Hebrews (Vol. 1, G. Gregory, Trans.). Hildesheim, Germany: Georg Olms Verlag. (Original work published 1753)
26.
LutherM. (1960). Lectures on Genesis. In PelikanJ. (Ed. & Trans.), Luther's works (Vol. 2). St. Louis, MO: Concordia.
27.
MoultonR. (1896-1918). The modern reader's Bible (Vols. 1–22). New York: Macmillan.
28.
MoultonR. (1899). The literary study of the Bible.Boston: Heath.
29.
MurfinR., & RayS. M. (2003). Historicism. In The Bedford glossary of critical and literary terms (2nd ed.). Boston: Bedford.
30.
Mueller-VollmerK. (1985). The hermeneutics reader: Texts of the German tradition from the Enlightenment to the present.New York: Continuum.
31.
NortonD. (2000). A history of the English Bible as literature.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PopkinR. H. (1996). Spinoza and Bible scholarship. In GarrettD. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Spinoza (pp. 383–407). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33.
PrickettS. (1991). Introduction. In PrickettS. (Ed.), Reading the text: Biblical criticism and literary theory (pp. 1–11). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
34.
PrickettS. (1999). Biblical and literary criticism: A history of interaction. In JasperD., & PrickettS. (Eds.), The Bible and literature: A reader (pp. 12–43). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
35.
ReevesM. (1991). The Bible and literary authorship in the Middle Ages. In PrickettS. (Ed.), Reading the text: Biblical criticism and literary theory (pp. 12–63). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
36.
RykenL. (1974). The literature of the Bible.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
37.
RykenL. (1984). How to read the Bible as literature.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
38.
RykenL. (1993). The Bible as literature: A brief history. In RykenL., & LongmanT.III (Eds.), A complete literary guide to the Bible (pp. 49–68). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
39.
RykenL. (1998). Bible stories for Derrida's children: Literary approaches to a sacred book. Books and Culture4(1), 38–41.
40.
RykenL. (2005, November 4). Words of delight: How to read the Bible as literature. Lecture presented for the Integration of Faith and English Lecture Event, Northwestern College, St. Paul, MN.
41.
de SaussureF. (1986). Course in general linguistics (BallyC., & SechehayeA., Eds., R. Harris, Trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1916)
42.
SchwartzR. (Ed.). (1990). The book and the text: The Bible and literary theory.Cambridge, England: Basil Blackwell.
43.
SidneyP. (1991). An apology for poetry. In KaplanC., & AndersonW. (Eds.), Criticism: Major statements (3rd ed., pp. 108–147). New York: St. Martin's Press. (Original work published 1595)
44.
VanhoozerK. J. (1998). Is there a meaning in this text?: The Bible, the reader, and the morality of literary knowledge.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
45.
VanhoozerK. J. (2002). First theology.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
46.
WalhoutC. (1991). Introduction. In WalhoutC., & RykenL. (Eds.), Contemporary literary theory: A Christian appraisal (pp. vii–x). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
47.
WalhoutC., & RykenL. (Eds.). (1991). Contemporary literary theory: A Christian appraisal.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
48.
WickerK. O., MillerA. S., & DubeM. W. (2005). Feminist New Testament studies: Global and future perspectives.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
WrightT. R. (1988). Theology and literature.Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
