Learning Styles Research: Understanding how Teaching Should be Impacted by the Way Learners Learn Part II: Understanding how Learners Prefer to Receive Information
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2006
Learning Styles Research: Understanding how Teaching Should be Impacted by the Way Learners Learn Part II: Understanding how Learners Prefer to Receive Information
Over the years, educators have asked questions about how people learn. This article is the second in a series of three that provide updated information on the impact of learning styles on learners. In addition, learning style assessments for each of the theories will also be discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArantM. P., ColemanA. M., & DanielB. D. (2002). Instructional strategies for on-line courses in education.Chattanooga, TN: Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED471350)
2.
CassidyS. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444.
3.
ClaxtonC. S., & MurrellP. H. (1987). Learning styles: Implications for improving educational practices.Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education. (ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 4)
4.
DavisJ. R. (1993). Better teaching, more learning: Strategies for success in postsecondary settings.Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education, Oryx Press.
5.
DuY., & SimpsonC. (2002). Effects of learning styles and class participation on students' enjoyment level in distributed learning environments.New Orleans, LA: Annual Conference of the Association for Library and Information Science Education. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED463755)
6.
DunnR. (1984). Learning style: State of the science. Theory into Practice, 23(1), 10–19.
7.
EliasR. Z. (2005). Students' approaches to study in introductory accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 194–199.
8.
EntwistleN. (1987). Understanding classroom learning. In EntwistleN. (Series Ed.), Changing Perspectives in Education.London: Hodder and Stoughton.
9.
EntwistleN. (1997). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In MartonF., HounsellD., & EntwistleN. (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–22). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
10.
EntwistleN. (2001). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment. In SuskieL. (Ed.), Assessment to promote deep learning: Insight from AAHE's 2000 and 1999 Assessment Conferences. Major addresses from “Rising expectations for assessment: Can we deliver?” (pp. 9–19). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451743)
11.
EntwistleN., & McCuneV. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345.
12.
EntwistleN., & TaitH. (1993). Approaches to studying and preferences for teaching in higher education: Implications for student ratings.Atlanta, GA: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED359206)
13.
GarnerJ. (2000). Problems and inconsistencies with Kolb's learning styles. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 341–348.
14.
HensonR. K., & HwangD. (2002). Variability and prediction of measurement error in Kolb's learning style inventory scores: A reliability generalization study. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 712–727.
15.
HickcoxL. K. (1995). Learning styles: A survey of adult learning style inventory models. In SimsR. R., & SimsS. J. (Eds.), The importance of learning styles (pp. 25–48). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
16.
HickcoxL. K. (2002). Personalizing teaching through experiential learning. College Teaching, 50(4), 123–128.
17.
JonassenD. H., & GrabowskiB. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
JonesC., ReichardC., & MokhtariK. (2003). Are students' learning styles discipline specific?Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27(5), 363–375.
19.
LooR. (2004). Kolb's learning styles and learning preferences: Is there a linkage?Educational Psychology, 24(1), 99–108.
20.
MartonF., HounsellD., & EntwistleN. (Eds.). (1997). The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
21.
McCarthyB. (1985). What 4MAT training teaches us about staff development. Educational Leadership, 42(7), 61–68.
22.
McCarthyB. (1987). The 4MAT system: Teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques.Barrington, IL: Excel.
23.
McCarthyB. (1990). Using the 4MAT system to bring learning styles to schools. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 31–37.
24.
McCarthyB. (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT's learning styles. Educational Leadership, 54(6), 46–51.
25.
PhilbinM., MeierE., HuffmanS., & BoverieP. (1995). A survey of gender and learning styles. Sex Roles, 32(7/8), 485–494.
26.
PintoJ. K., GeigerM. A., & BoyleE. J. (1994). A three-year longitudinal study of changes in student learning styles. Journal of College Student Development, 35(2), 113–119.
27.
RibichF. D., & SchmeckR. R. (1979). Multivariate relationships between measures of learning style and memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(4), 515–529.
28.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education.Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education.
29.
SantrockJ. W. (2001). Educational psychology.Boston: McGraw-Hill.
30.
SchmeckR. R. (1981). Improving learning by improving thinking. Educational Leadership, 38(5), 384–385.
31.
SchmeckR. R. (Ed.). (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles.New York: Plenum Press.
32.
SchmeckR. R., & Geisler-BrensteinE. (1991). Self-concept and learning: The revised inventory of learning processes. Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), 343–362.
33.
SchmeckR. R., RibichF. D., & RamanaiahN. (1977). Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 413–431.
34.
SchreiberJ. B., & ShinnD. (2003). Epistemological beliefs of community college students and their learning processes. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 699–709.
35.
ScottH. V. (1994). A serious look at the 4MAT model.Institute, WV: West Virginia State College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED383654)
36.
SimsR. R., & SimsS. J. (Eds.). (1995). The importance of learning styles.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
37.
SmithR. M. (1990). Learning to learn across the life span.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
SuskieL. (Ed.). (2001). Assessment to promote deep learning: Insight from AAHE's 2000 and 1999 Assessment Conferences. Major addresses from “Rising expectations for assessment: Can we deliver?” Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451743)
39.
TendyS. M., & GeiserW. F. (1997). The search for style: It all depends on where you look. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED410029)
40.
TerrellS., & DringusL. (2000). An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(3), 231–238.
41.
VeresJ. G., SimsR. R., & LocklearT. S. (1991). Improving the reliability of Kolb's revised learning style inventory. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 143–150.
42.
WillcoxsonL., & ProsserM. (1996). Kolb's learning style inventory (1985): Review and further study of validity and reliability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(2), 247–257.
