Although both Catholics and Protestants alike have condemned Philipp Melanchthon for theological views, many have praised his educational reforms. The following is a study of the development of Melanchthon's educational theories in light of his theological views in order to reveal how he understood natural reason and divine revelation to cooperate. The study also places Melanchthon in context by comparing him to contemporary Catholic educators. Melanchthon did not solely attach himself to either secular philosophy or sacred theology but found a synergistic balance that allowed him to systematize not only theological doctrine but also humanist education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Primary Sources:
2.
BarkerW. (Ed.). (2001). The adages of Erasmus.Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
3.
BretschneiderC. (Ed.). (1963). Corpus reformatorum, Melanchthonis opera (Vols. 1–28). New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
4.
CordascoF. (Ed.). (1971). Vives on education: A translation of the De Tradendis Disciplinis of Juan Luis Vives.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
5.
GanssG. (Ed.). (1991). Ignatius of Loyola: The spiritual exercises and selected works.New York: Paulist Press.
6.
GuerlacR. (Ed.). (1979). Juan Luis Vives against the pseudodialecticians: A humanistic attack on medieval logic.Boston: D. Reidel.
7.
JardineL. (Ed.). (1997). The education of a Christian prince.Cambridge, UK: University Press.
8.
KeenR. (Ed.). (1986). A Melanchthon reader.New York: Peterlang.
9.
KusukawaS. (Ed.). (1999). Philip Melanchthon: Orations on philosophy and education.Cambridge, UK: University Press.
10.
ParkerD. (Ed.). (1989). Paul's letter to the Colossians: Philip Melanchthon.Worcester, UK: Billing & Sons Ltd.
11.
ParkerJ.I., and JohnstonO.R. (Trans.). (1957). Martin Luther on the bondage of the will: A new translation of De Servo Arbito (1525) Martin Luther's reply to Erasmus of Rotterdam.Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell Company.
12.
StupperichR. (Ed.). (1951). Melanchthons Werke in Auswahl (Vols. 1–7). Gütersloh, West Germany: Gerd Mohn.
13.
Secondary Works:
14.
BrodrickJ. (1962). Saint Peter Canisius.Chicago: Loyola University Press.
15.
DouglasR. (1959). Jacopo Sadoleto, 1477–1547: Humanist and reformer.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
DurantW. (1985). The Reformation: A history of European civilization from Wyclif to Calvin: 1300–1564.New York: MJF Books.
17.
EbelingG. (1970). Luther: An introduction to his thought.Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
18.
GravesF. (1910). A history of education: Vol. II. During the Middle Ages and the transition to modern times.New York: Macmillan.
19.
GreenL. (1973). Faith, righteousness, and justification: New light on their development under Luther and Melanchthon. Sixteenth Century Journal, 4, 65–86.
20.
HartfelderK. (1889). Melanchthon als Praeceptor Germaniae.Berlin: Hofmann.
21.
KrayeJ. (1988). Moral philosophy. In SchmittC., & SkinnerQ. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy.Cambridge, UK: University Press.
22.
KusukawaS. (1995). The transformation of natural philosophy: The case of Philip Melanchthon.Cambridge, UK: University Press.
23.
ManschreckC. (1958). Melanchthon: The quiet reformer.Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
24.
MariusR. (1984). Thomas More: A biography.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
MeijeringE. (1983). Melanchthon and patristic thought: The doctrines of Christ and grace, the Trinity and the creation.Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill.
26.
SchmittC. (1988). The rise of the philosophical textbook. In SchmittC., & SkinnerQ. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy.Cambridge, UK: University Press.
27.
SmithP. (1920). The age of reformation.New York: Henry Holt.
28.
StraussG. (1978). Luther's house of learning: Indoctrination and the young in the German reformation.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
29.
WengertT. (1997). Law and gospel: Philip Melanchthon's debate with John Agricola of Eisleben over Poenitentia.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
30.
WoodwardW. (1965). Studies in education during the age of Renaissance, 1400–1600.New York: Russell and Russell.
