Abstract
Courts trying newspaper headline libel cases have relied on a “unit approach” in which headline and accompanying story are evaluated as a unit. This experimental study suggests such an approach may not be highly effective. Subjects who saw a defamatory headline accompanied by a non-defamatory article were more likely to perceive the unit as defamatory than were those reading a non-defamatory headline and defamatory story. This result, in conjunction with reader habits of scanning headlines only, suggests courts might consider potentially libelous headlines separate from the accompanying article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
