An examination of editorial cartoons about the Coronavirus pandemic during the first 6 months finds that subjects and topics followed developments in the spread of the pandemic and public health and safety responses and mirrored those found in news coverage. More, messages generally reflected largely consensual establishment views of the crisis and official health and safety responses. Cartoonists seemed to adopt the role of cheerleader for government policy and efforts to grapple with the pandemic.
AkandeO. (2002). A semiotic analysis of political cartoons: A case study of Nigeria [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma].
2.
AlthausS. L.EdyJ. A.EntmanR. M.PhalenP. (1996). Revising the indexing hypothesis: Officials, media, and the Libya crisis. Political Communication, 13, 407–421.
BaumgartnerJ. C. (2019a). Introduction, section 5: The Great Depression through the 1960s (1929-1960). In BaumgartnerJ. C. (Ed.), American political humor: Masters of satire and their impact on U.S. policy and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 241–251). ABC-CLIO.
5.
BaumgartnerJ. C. (2019b). Introduction, section 4: The gilded age to the Great Depression (1873-1929). In BaumgartnerJ. C. (Ed.), American political humor: Masters of satire and their impact on U.S. policy and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 151–162). ABC-CLIO.
6.
BennettW. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–125.
7.
BormannE. G.KoesterJ.BennettJ. (1978). Political cartoons and salient rhetorical fantasies: An empirical analysis of the “76 presidential campaign..”Communication Monographs, 45(4), 317–329.
8.
BounegruL.ForcevilleC. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229.
9.
BrightonP.FoyD. (2007). News values. SAGE.
10.
BuellE. H.Jr.MausM. (1988). Is the pen mightier than the word? Editorial cartoons and 1988 presidential nominating politics. PS: Political Science and Politics, 21(4), 847–858.
CapleH.BednarekM. (2013). Delving into the discourse: Approaches to news values in journalism studies and beyond. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
13.
CaswellL. S. (2004). Drawing swords: War in American editorial cartoons. American Journalism, 21(2), 13–45.
14.
ConnersJ. L. (2005). Visual representations of the 2004 presidential campaign: Political cartoons and popular culture references. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 479–487.
15.
ConnersJ. L. (2007). Popular culture in political cartoons: Analyzing cartoonist approaches. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2), 261–265.
16.
ConnersJ. L. (2010). Barack vs. Hillary: Race, gender and political cartoon imagery of the 2008 Presidential primaries. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(3), 298–312.
17.
ConnersJ. L. (2013). Binders of bayonets for big bird: Analysis of political cartoon images of the 2012 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1144–1156.
18.
DanjouxI. (2007). Reconsidering the decline of the editorial cartoon. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2), 245–248.
19.
DesousaM. A.MedhurstM. J. (1982). Political cartoons and American culture: Significant symbols of campaign 1980. Studies in Visual Communication, 8(1), 84–97.
20.
DiamondM. (2002). No laughing matter: Post-September 11 political cartoons in Arab/Muslim newspapers. Political Communication, 19(2), 251–272.
EdwardsJ. L. (1997). Political cartoons in the 1988 presidential campaign: Image, metaphor, and narrative. Garland.
23.
EdwardsJ. L. (2001). Running in the shadows in campaign 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2140–2151.
24.
EdwardsJ. L. (2007). Drawing politics in pink and blue. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2), 249–253.
25.
EdwardsJ. L. (2009). Presidential campaign cartoons and political authenticity: Visual reflections in 2008. In DentonR. E.Jr. (Eed.)The 2008 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 191–208). Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
FarnsworthS. J.LichterS. R. (2019). Late night with Trump: Political humor and the American presidency. Routledge.
27.
GansH. J. (2004). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. Northwestern University Press.
HarcupT.O’NeillD. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280.
30.
HasanahN.HidayatD. N. (2020). A semiotic analysis of political cartoons on the first 100 days of Anies Baswedan government. EduLite: Journal of English, 5(2), 322–333.
31.
HessS.NorthropS. (2017). American political cartoons: 1754 – 2010. Routledge.
32.
HillA. (1984). The Carter campaign in retrospect: Decoding the cartoons. In MedhurstM. J.BensonT. W. (Eds.), Rhetorical dimensions in media: A critical casebook (pp. 182–203). Kendall/Hunt.
33.
HoffmanD. R.HowardA. D. (2007). Representations of 9-11 in editorial cartoons. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2), 271–274.
34.
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
35.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. N. (2008). Echo chamber. Oxford University Press.
36.
KoetzleW.BrunellT. L. (1996). Lip-reading, draft-dodging, and Perot-noia: Presidential campaigns in editorial cartoons. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(4), 94–115.
LichterR. S.BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (2014). Politics is a joke! How TV comedians are remaking political life. Westview Press.
39.
LippmannW. (1922). Public opinion. The Free Press.
40.
LordonE. J. (2006). Politics, ink: How Americas cartoonists skewer politicians, from King George III to George Dubya. Rowman & Littlefield.
41.
MendozaR. C. (2016). Semiotic concepts of editorial cartoons. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 3(1), 35–45.
42.
MerminJ. (1996). Conflict in the sphere of consensus? Critical reporting on the Panama invasion and the Gulf War. Political Communication, 13, 181–194.
43.
NilsenA. P.NilsenD. L. F. (2008). Political cartoons: Zeitgeists and the creation and recycling of satirical symbols. In BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age (pp. 67–80). Routledge.
44.
ParksP. (2019). Textbook news values: Stable concepts, changing choices. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 784–810.
45.
RamliS. M.MokhtarM. (2019). Cartoon controversy: Semiotic analysis of political cartoon by Zunar portraying the issue of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). Journal of Media and Information Warfare, 12(1), 73–116.
46.
SewellE. H.Jr. (1998). “Torture-by-tedium” or editorial cartoons during the 1996 presidential campaign. In DentonR. E.Jr. (Ed.) The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 161–177). Praeger.
47.
ShaikhN. Z.RuksanaT.SaqlainN. (2016). Cartoon war . . . a political dilemma! A semiotic analysis of political cartoons. Journal of Media Studies, 31(1), 74–92.
48.
SolomonE. (1984). Eustace Tilley sees the thirties through a glass monocle, lightly: “New Yorker” cartoonists and the Depression years. Studies in American Humor (New Series, 2), 3(2/3), 201–219.
49.
SomersP. P.Jr. (1996). Right in the Führer’s face. American Journalism, 13(3), 333–353.
TrimbleL.WayL.SampertS. (2010). Drawn to the polls? Representations of Canadian voters in editorial cartoons. Journal of Canadian Studies, 44(2), 70–94.
52.
UlubeyliS.ArslanV.KivrakS. (2015). A semiotic analysis of cartoons about occupational health and safety issues in the construction workplace. Construction Management and Economics, 33(5), 1–17.
53.
WinfieldB. H.YoonD. (2002). Historical images at a glance: North Korea in American editorial cartoons. Newspaper Research Journal, 23(4), 97–100.
54.
ZallerJ.ChiuD. (1996). Governments little helper: U.S. Press coverage of foreign policy crisis, 1945-1991. Political Communication, 13, 385–405.
55.
ZurbriggenE. L.ShermanA. M. (2010). Race and gender in the 2008 U.S. presidential election: A content analysis of editorial cartoons. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 223–247.
