Following a recent push to reframe gun violence as a public health issue, an online survey (N = 510) helped explore frame salience and frame adoption through the lens of media advocacy. Findings revealed that gun control and gun rights frames are salient, and television, social media and newspapers are the most popular sources of gun violence information. Individuals are being held responsible, while background checks were the most salient and adopted solution among Americans. Three gun rights organizations were the most salient organizations from media coverage related to gun violence. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AskelsonN.CampoS.MastinT.SlonskeM. (2009). The missing role of parents: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of parenting practices and communication strategies for addressing binge drinking. Communication Research Reports, 26, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090802637031
BirklandT. A.LawrenceR. G. (2009). Media framing and policy change after Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1405–1425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209332555
5.
CacciatoreM. A.ScheufeleD. A.IyengarS. (2016). The end of framing as we know it... and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
6.
ChyiH. I.McCombsM. (2004). Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100103
7.
DeFosterR.SwalveN. (2018). Guns, culture or mental health? Framing mass shootings as a public health crisis. Health Communication, 33(10), 1211–1222.
8.
DruckmanJ. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055404041413
9.
EdyJ. A.MeirickP. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57, 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00332.x
10.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
HemenwayD.MillerM. (2013). Public health approach to the prevention of gun violence. New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 2033–2035. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb1302631
15.
HolodyK. J.DanielE. S. (2017). Attributes and frames of the Aurora shootings: National and local news coverage differences. Journalism Practice, 11, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1121786
16.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964379
17.
JashinskyJ. M.MagnussonB.HansonC.BarnesM. (2017). Media agenda setting regarding gun violence before and after a mass shooting. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, Article 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00291
KnightE. K.BenjaminG. D.YanichD. (2016). Framing social determinants of health within the professional public health community: Research translation and implications for policy change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44, 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.1192291
MatthesJ. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600206
MatthesJ. (2013). The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions: Exploring the distinct effects of affective and cognitive involvement. Communication Research, 40, 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211420255
27.
McGintyE. E.WebsterD. W.JarlenskiM.BarryC. L. (2014). News media framing of serious mental illness and gun violence in the United States, 1997-2012. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 406–413. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301557
28.
McKeeverB. W. (2013). News framing of autism: Understanding media advocacy and the combating autism act. Science Communication, 35(2), 213–240.
29.
MorinA. (2016). Framing terror: The strategies newspapers use to frame an act as terror or crime. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(4), 986–1005.
30.
MozaffarianD.HemenwayD.LudwigD. S. (2013). Curbing gun violence: Lessons from public health successes. JAMA, 309, 551–552. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.38
31.
MuschertG. W.CarrD. (2006). Media salience and frame changing across events: Coverage of nine school shootings, 1997–2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300402
32.
ParkS. Y.HolodyK. J.ZhangX. (2012). Race in media coverage of school shootings: A parallel application of framing theory and attribute agenda setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012448873
ScheufeleD.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
35.
ThrasherJ. F.KimS. H.RoseI.NavarroA.CraftM. K.DavisK. J.BiggersS. (2014). Print media coverage around failed and successful tobacco tax initiatives: The South Carolina experience. American Journal of Health Promotion, 29, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130104-quan-11
36.
WallackL.DorfmanL.JerniganD.ThembaM. (1993). Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention. SAGE.
37.
WettsteinM. (2012). Frame adoption in referendum campaigns: The effect of news coverage on the public salience of issue interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426328
38.
WilsonL. C.BallmanA. D.BuczekT. J. (2016). News content about mass shootings and attitudes toward mental illness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015610064
