This research explores the impact of ownership on innovations in U.S. newspaper newsrooms by constructing a structural equation model (SEM). The study, using an online survey (N = 1,063), found that social media triggers a paradigm shift—newspapers owned by publicly held, for-profit companies excel in social media innovations and create more social media friendly innovations milieus than newspapers owned by privately held, for-profit companies. Journalists from the publicly held newspapers engage with audiences more on social media than privately held newspapers. The more journalists engage on Twitter, the more they tend to have a negative attitude toward social media. However, the more journalists at publicly held newspapers engage on Facebook, the more they tend to hold a positive attitude toward social media, opposite of journalists at privately held newspapers.
AalbergT.BlekesauneA.ElvestadE. (2013). Media choice and informed democracy: Toward increasing news consumption gaps in Europe?The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 281–303.
2.
AalbergT.Van AelstP.CurranJ. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255–271.
3.
AbernathyP. M. (2016). The rise of a new media baron and the emerging threat of news deserts. Center for Innovation and Sustainability in Local Media, University of North Carolina Press.
4.
AlexanderD. E. (2014). Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), 717–733.
5.
ApukeO. (2017). Another look at the political economy of the mainstream and new media: The capitalists influence. Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism, 7(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7912.1000341
6.
BensonR. (2016). Institutional forms of media ownership and their modes of power. In EideM.SjovaagH.LarsenL. O. (Eds.), Journalism reexamined: Digital challenges and professional reorientations. Lessons from northern Europe (pp. 29–47). Intellect.
7.
BentlerP. M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In NesselroadeJ. R.CattellR. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 317–335) Springer.
8.
BertrandC.-J. (2018). Media ethics and accountability systems. Routledge.
9.
BoylesJ. L. (2016). The isolation of innovation: Restructuring the digital newsroom through intrapreneurship. Digital Journalism, 4(2), 229–246.
10.
BroersmaM.GrahamT. (2012). Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403–419.
11.
ByrneB. M. (2000). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CamagniR. P. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science, 74(4), 317–340.
13.
CohenN. S. (2018). At work in the digital newsroom. Digital Journalism, 7(5), 1–21.
14.
CouperM. P.MillerP. V. (2008). Web survey methods: Introduction. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 831–835.
15.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
16.
CurranJ. (2011). Media and democracy. Taylor & Francis.
17.
DemersD. P. (1996). Corporate newspaper structure, profits, and organizational goals. Journal of Media Economics, 9(2), 1–23.
18.
Di GangiP. M.WaskoM. M. (2016). Social media engagement theory: Exploring the influence of user engagement on social media usage. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 28(2), 53–73.
19.
DjankovS.McLieshC.NenovaT.ShleiferA. (2003). Who owns the media?The Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 341–382.
20.
DogruelL. (2013). Opening the black box. The conceptualising of media innovation. Nordicom.
21.
DogruelL. (2014). What is so special about media innovations? A characterization of the field. The Journal of Media Innovations, 1(1), 52–69.
22.
DunawayJ. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. The Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1193–1202.
23.
DunawayJ. (2013). Media ownership and story tone in campaign news. American Politics Research, 41(1), 24–53.
24.
EkdaleB.SingerJ. B.TullyM.HarmsenS. (2015). Making change: Diffusion of technological, relational, and cultural innovation in the newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 938–958.
25.
EngesserS.HumprechtE. (2015). Frequency or skillfulness: How professional news media use Twitter in five Western countries. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 513–529.
26.
FagerbergJ.MoweryD. C.NelsonR. R. (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press.
27.
FanJ. P.WongT.ZhangT. (2013). Institutions and organizational structure: The case of state-owned corporate pyramids. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(6), 1217–1252.
28.
FanW.YanZ. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139.
29.
FrancisD.BessantJ. (2005). Targeting innovation and implications for capability development. Technovation, 25(3), 171–183.
30.
FrancisJ.SmithA. (1995). Agency costs and innovation some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2–3), 383–409.
31.
Gil de ZúñigaH.DiehlT.Ardèvol-AbreuA. (2018). When citizens and journalists interact on Twitter: Expectations of journalists’ performance on social media and perceptions of media bias. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 227–246.
GulyasA. (2013). The influence of professional variables on journalists’ uses and views of social media: A comparative study of Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 270–285.
34.
GulyásÁ. (2016). Social media and journalism: Hybridity, convergence, changing relationship with the audience, and fragmentation. In FranklinB.EldridgeS.II (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (pp. 396–406). Routledge.
35.
HabannF. (2008). Towards a methodological foundation of media innovation research. In ZottoC. D.KranenburgH. V. (Eds.), Management and innovation in the media industry (pp. 67–86). Edward Elgar.
36.
HamiltonJ. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton University Press.
37.
HermidaA. (2012a). Social journalism: Exploring how social media is shaping journalism. In SiaperaE.VeglisA. (Eds.), The handbook of global online journalism (pp. 309–328). Wiley-Blackwell.
38.
HermidaA. (2012b). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 659–668.
39.
HillC. W.SnellS. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.
HolmstromB. (1989). Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12(3), 305–327.
42.
JianG.LiuT. (2018). Journalist social media practice in China: A review and synthesis. Journalism, 19(9–10), 1452–1470. https://doi.org/1464884918778257
43.
KaplanD. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. SAGE.
44.
KarimiJ.WalterZ. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39–81.
45.
KrumsvikA. H. (2009). The online news factory: A multi-lens investigation of the strategy, structure, and process of online news production at CNN and NRK. Institutt for Medier og Kommunikasjon, University of Oslo.
46.
KrumsvikA. H. (2015). Newspaper ownership and the prioritization of digital competences. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 777–790.
47.
KrumsvikA. H.SkogerbøE.StorsulT. (2013). Size, ownership and innovation in newspapers. In StorsulT.KrumsvikA. H. (Eds.), Media innovations (pp. 93–109). Nordicom.
48.
LaceteraN. (2001). Corporate governance and the governance of innovation: The case of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(1), 29–59.
49.
LivingstoneS. (1999). New media, new audiences?New Media & Society, 1(1), 59–66.
50.
McChesneyR. W.SchillerD. (2003). The political economy of international communications: Foundations for the emerging global debate about media ownership and regulation. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
MoscoV. (1996). The political economy of communication: Rethinking and renewal. SAGE.
53.
MoscoV. (1998). Political economy, communication, and labor. In SussmanG.LentJ. A. (Eds.), Global productions: Labor in the making of the information society (pp. 13–38). Hampton Press.
54.
NapoliP. M.YanM. Z. (2007). Media ownership regulations and local news programming on broadcast television: An empirical analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(1), 39–57.
55.
NoamE. M. (2016). Who owns the world’s media? Media concentration and ownership around the world. Oxford University Press.
56.
NunnallyJ. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. McGraw-Hill.
57.
OgengaF. (2010). Political economy of the Kenyan media-towards a culture of active citizen journalism. Global Media Journal-African Edition, 4(2), 151–162.
58.
O’SullivanM. (2001). Contests for corporate control: Corporate governance and economic performance in the United States and Germany. Oxford University Press.
59.
OttosenR.KrumsvikA. H. (2012). Digital challenges on the Norwegian media scene. Nordicom Review, 33(2), 43–55.
60.
PaulussenS. (2016). Innovation in the newsroom. In WitschgeT.Christopher WilliamA.DavidD.AlfredH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism (pp. 192–206). SAGE.
61.
PavlikJ. V. (2013). Innovation and the future of journalism. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 181–193.
62.
PicardR. G.Van WeezelA. (2008). Capital and control: Consequences of different forms of newspaper ownership. The International Journal on Media Management, 10(1), 22–31.
63.
PodgerP. J. (2009). The limits of control: With journalists and their employers increasingly active on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, news organizations are struggling to respond to a host of new ethics challenges. American Journalism Review, 31(4), 32–38.
64.
PosterM. (2018). The second media age. John Wiley.
65.
ReddenJ.WitschgeT. (2010). A new news order? Online news content examined. In FentonN. (Ed.), New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age (pp. 171–186). SAGE.
66.
RogersE. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Collier Macmillan Inc.
67.
RogersE. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
68.
RogersR. (2017). Otherwise engaged: Social media from vanity metrics to critical analytics. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1–23.
69.
SantosJ. R. A. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 1–5.
70.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
71.
SehlA.CorniaA.NielsenR. K. (2016). Public service news and digital media [Reuters institute reports]. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
72.
SingerJ. B.DomingoD.HeinonenA.HermidaA.PaulussenS.QuandtT.ReichZ.VujnovicM. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. John Wiley .
73.
StorsulT.KrumsvikA. H. (2013). What is media innovation? In KrumsvikA.StorsulT. (Eds.), Media innovation: A multidisciplinary study of change (pp. 93–109). Nordicom.
74.
TandocE. C. (2015). Why Web Analytics Click: Factors affecting the ways journalists use audience metrics. Journalism Studies, 16, 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.946309
75.
TapscottD. (1996). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence (Vol. 1). McGraw-Hill.
76.
TapscottD.WilliamsA. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin.
77.
TiddJ.BessantJ.PavittK. (2005). Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley.
78.
Van CuilenburgJ.McQuailD. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts: Towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181–207.
79.
Von NordheimG.BoczekK.KoppersL. (2018). Sourcing the sources: An analysis of the use of Twitter and Facebook as a journalistic source over 10 years in The New York Times, The Guardian, and Süddeutsche Zeitung. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 807–828.
80.
WaisbordS. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. John Wiley.
81.
WilliamsR. (1977). Marxism and literature (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
82.
WillnatL.WeaverD. H. (2014). American journalist in the digital age: Key findings. School of Journalism, Indiana University.
83.
WillnatL.WeaverD. H.WilhoitG. C. (2017). The American journalist in the digital age: A half-century perspective. Peter Lang.
84.
WinstonB. (1998). Media technology and society: A history: From the telegraph to the internet. Psychology Press.
85.
WrightK. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1034.
86.
ZellerF.HermidaA. (2015). When tradition meets immediacy and interaction. The integration of social media in journalists’ everyday practices. Sur Le Journalisme/About Journalism/Sobre Jornalismo, 4(1), 106–119.
