A series of three studies examined how misleading questions and misinformation in a news article resulted in eyewitnesses remembering they saw a weapon that was actually not visible during a robbery. Some participants even provided a description of the weapon, though the weapon type depended on whether the news story depicted the alleged weapon as a gun or a knife. Hence, reporters can influence eyewitness memories with misleading questions and false memories of other eyewitnesses.
AgrestiA.FinlayB. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
2.
AlbrightT. D. (2017). Why eyewitnesses fail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7758–7764.
3.
BentonT. R.RossD. F.BradshawE.ThomasW. N.BradshawG. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 115–129.
4.
BlomR. (2019). Eyes wide shut: Failures to teach student journalists about eyewitness error. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 74(3), 345–357.
5.
BrainerdC. J.ReynaV. F. (2019). Fuzzy-trace theory, false memory, and the law. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 79–86.
6.
BraunK. A.EllisR.LoftusE. F. (2002). Make my memory: How advertising can change our memories of the past. Psychology & Marketing, 19(1), 1–23.
7.
CarpenterS.CepakA.PengZ. (2018). An exploration of the complexity of journalistic interviewing competencies. Journalism Studies, 19(15), 2283–2303.
8.
CasselW. S.RoebersC. E. M.BjorklandD. F. (1996). Developmental patterns of eyewitness responses to repeated and increasingly suggestive questions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 116–133.
9.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428.
10.
DoddD. H.BradshawJ. M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 695–704.
11.
DrivdahlS. B.ZaragozaM. S. (2001). The role of perceptual elaboration and individual differences in the creation of false memories for suggested events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 265–281.
12.
EisenM. L.GabbertF.YingR.WilliamsJ. (2017). “I think he had a tattoo on his neck”: How co-witness discussions about a perpetrator’s description can affect eyewitness identification decisions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 274–282.
13.
EntmanR. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
14.
GansH. (1980). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Random House.
HanwayP.AkehurstL.VernhamZ.HopeL. (2020). The effects of cognitive load during an investigative interviewing task on mock interviewers’ recall of information. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26(1), 25–41.
17.
HoweM. L.WimmerM. C.BleaseK. (2009). The role of associative strength in children’s false memory illusions. Memory, 17(1), 8–16.
JohnsonM. K.HashtroudiS.LindsayD. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28.
21.
LindsayD. S.JohnsonM. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 349–358.
22.
LippmannW. (1922). Public opinion. Macmillan.
23.
LoftusE. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366.
24.
LoftusE. F. (2019). Eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 498–503.
25.
LoftusE. F.BanajiM. R. (1989). Memory modification and the role of the media. In GheorghiuV. U.NetterP.EysenckH. J.RosenthalR. (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 279–303). Springer.
26.
LoftusE. F.HoffmanH. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 100–104.
27.
LoftusE. F.PalmerJ. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589.
28.
LoftusE. F.ZanniG. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5(1), 86–88.
29.
LynnS. J.EvansJ.LaurenceJ.-R.LilienfeldS. O. (2015). What do people believe about memory? Implications for the science and pseudoscience of clinical practice. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(12), 541–547.
30.
MahrJ. B.CsibraG. (2018). What is it to remember?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, Article E1.
31.
McCloskeyM.ZaragozaM. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(1), 1–16.
32.
MoyP.TewksburyD.RinkeE. M. (2016). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing. In JensenK. B.CraigR. T.PooleyJ. D.RothenbuhlerE. W. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–13). Wiley-Blackwell.
33.
NylandM. (2011). The news-generating machine. Journalism Practice, 5(4), 478–491.
34.
OstJ.EastonS.HopeL.FrenchC. C.WrightD. B. (2017). Latent variables underlying the memory beliefs of chartered clinical psychologists, hypnotherapists and undergraduate students. Memory, 25(1), 57–68.
35.
OtgaarH.HoweM. L.BrackmannN.WangJ. (2016). When children are the worst and best eyewitnesses: Factors behind the development of false memory. In NashR. A.OstJ. (Eds.), False and distorted memories (pp. 23–38). Routledge.
36.
PenaM. M.KlemfussJ. Z.LoftusE. F.MindthoffA. (2017). The effects of exposure to differing amounts of misinformation and source credibility perception on source monitoring and memory accuracy. Psychology of Consciousness, 4(4), 337–347.
37.
ResnickM. L. (2014). When eyewitnesses misremember: The delicate balance between forensic investigation and memory evidence assessment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 539–543.
38.
SchudsonM. (1995). The power of news. Harvard University Press.
39.
SearcyJ.BartlettJ. C.MemonA. (2000). Influence of post-event narratives, line-up conditions and individual differences on false identification by young and older eyewitnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(2), 219–235.
40.
SimonsD. J.ChabrisC. F. (2011). What people believe about how memory works: A representative survey of the U.S. population. PLOS ONE, 6(8), Article e22757.
41.
SmithA. M.CutlerB. L. (2013). Introduction: Identification procedures and conviction of the innocent. In CutlerB. L. (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 3–21). American Psychological Association.
42.
SmithV. L.EllsworthP. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 294–300.
43.
StenzelC. (2017). Eyewitness misidentification: A mistake that blinds investigations, sways juries, and locks innocent people behind bars. Creighton Law Review, 50(3), 515–532.
44.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.
45.
TulvingE. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 1–25.
ZaragozaM. S.LaneS. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 934–945.
48.
ZaragozaM. S.RichP.RindalE.DeFrancoR. (2016). Forced fabrications and false eyewitness memories. In NashR. A.OstJ. (Eds.), False and distorted memories (pp. 72–86). Routledge.
