This study builds on our understanding of how visual journalism is used with environmental reporting to create a sense of place and understanding. Although most American photojournalism tends to favor close-up photos with people, environmental coverage leans opposite: sweeping landscape photos devoid of people. However, our content analysis of wire and non-wire environmental photos on U.S. newspaper front pages shows support that person-focused feature imagery is being used more, though mostly at an informational level.
AdamsP. C.GynnildA. (2013). Environmental messages in online media: The role of place. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(1), 113–130.
2.
AderC. R. (1995). A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 300–311.
AnderssonL. (2017). Where technology goes to die: Representations of electronic waste in global television news. Environmental Communication, 11(2), 263–275.
5.
BeckerH. S. (1995). Visual sociology, documentary photography, and photojournalism: It’s (almost) all a matter of context. Visual Studies, 10(1–2), 5–14.
6.
BendixJ.LieblerC. M. (1999). Place, distance, and environmental news: Geographic variation in newspaper coverage of the spotted owl conflict. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(4), 658–676.
7.
BissellK. L. (2000). A return to “Mr. Gates”: Photography and objectivity. Newspaper Research Journal, 21(3), 81–93.
8.
BornD. (2019). Bearing witness? Polar bears as icons for climate change communication in National Geographic. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 649–663.
9.
BoströmM.UgglaY. (2016). A sociology of environmental representation. Environmental Sociology, 2(4), 355–364.
10.
BoykoffM. T. (2009). We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 431–457.
11.
BoykoffM. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
12.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190–1204.
13.
BoykoffM. T.RajanS. R. (2007). Signals and noise: Mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. EMBO Reports, 8(3), 207–211.
14.
Brooker-GrossS. R. (1981). News wire services in the nineteenth-century United States. Journal of Historical Geography, 7(2), 167–179.
15.
BrossardD.ShanahanJ.McComasK. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication & Society, 7(3), 359–377.
ColemanR. (2010). Framing the pictures in our heads. In KuypersJ. A.D’AngeloP. (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 233–261). Routledge.
18.
ColemanR.BanningS. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 313–328.
19.
ColemanR.WuD. (2015). Image and emotion in voter decisions: The affect agenda. Lexington Books.
20.
CookmanC. H. (2009). American photojournalism: Motivations and meanings. Northwestern University Press.
21.
CreechB. (2017). A newsmaker’s tool: The 35mm camera and journalism’s material epistemology. Journalism, 18(9), 1125–1141.
22.
CrononW. (1996). The trouble with wilderness. Environmental History, 1(1), 20–25.
23.
DeLucaK.DemoA. (2000). Imaging nature: Watkins, Yosemite and the birth of environmentalism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17(3), 241–260.
24.
DiFrancescoD. A.YoungN. (2011). Seeing climate change: The visual construction of global warming in Canadian national print media. Cultural Geographies, 18(4), 517–536.
25.
DunwoodyS.GriffinR. J. (1993). Journalistic strategies for reporting long-term environmental issues: A case study of three Superfund sites. In HansenA. (Ed.), The mass media and environmental issues (pp. 22–50). Leicester University Press.
26.
FahmyS.KimD. (2008). Picturing the Iraq War: Constructing the image of war in the British and US press. International Communication Gazette, 70(6), 443–462.
27.
FarnsworthB. E. (2011). Conservation photography as environmental education: Focus on the pedagogues. Environmental Education Research, 17(6), 769–787.
28.
FerrariM. P. (2013). Sporting nature(s): Wildness, the primitive, and naturalizing imagery in MMA and sports advertisements. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(2), 277–296.
29.
FerrucciP.TaylorR.AlaimoK. I. (2020). On the boundaries: Professional photojournalists navigating identity in an age of technological democratization. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 367–385.
30.
FreelonD. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 120–133.
31.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
32.
GoodmanM. K.LittlerJ.BrockingtonD.BoykoffM. (2016). Spectacular environmentalisms: Media, knowledge and the framing of ecological politics. Environmental Communication, 10(6), 677–688.
33.
GürselZ. D. (2012). The politics of wire service photography: Infrastructures of representation in a digital newsroom. American Ethnologist, 39(1), 71–89.
34.
GürselZ. D. (2015). A short history of wire service photography. In HillJ.SchwartzV. (Eds.), Getting the picture: The visual culture of the news (pp. 206–211). Bloomsbury.
35.
HallS. (1997). The work of representation. In Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (Vol. 2, pp. 13–74), SAGE.
36.
HansenA. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 7–25.
37.
HansenA. (2018). Environment, media and communication. Routledge.
38.
HansenA.MachinD. (Eds.). (2013). Visual environmental communication [Special issue]. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(2), 151–168.
39.
HanuschF. (2012). The visibility of disaster deaths in news images: A comparison of newspapers from 15 countries. International Communication Gazette, 74(7), 655–672.
40.
HaughtM. J.MorrisD. L. (2018). Hubs for innovation: Examining the effects of consolidated news design on quality. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(2), 145–154.
41.
HerrmannV. S. (2019). Rural ruins in America’s climate change story: Photojournalism, perception, and agency in Shishmaref, Alaska. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109, 1–18.
42.
HessK. (2013). Breaking boundaries: Recasting the “local” newspaper as “geo-social” news in a digital landscape. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 48–63.
43.
HoelscherS. (1998). The photographic construction of tourist space in Victorian America. Geographical Review, 88(4), 548–570.
44.
HuangY.FahmyS. (2011). Same events, two stories: Comparing the photographic coverage of the 2008 anti-China/Olympics demonstrations in Chinese and US newspapers. International Communication Gazette, 73(8), 732–752.
45.
JacobsonS. K.LanginC.CarltonJ. S.KaidL. L. (2012). Content analysis of newspaper coverage of the Florida panther. Conservation Biology, 26(1), 171–179.
46.
JonesJ. P.Thomas-WaltersL.RustN. A.VeríssimoD. (2019). Nature documentaries and saving nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet. People and Nature, 1(4), 420–425.
47.
KobréK. (1999a). Positive/negative: Editing for intimacy. Visual Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 18–19.
48.
KobréK. (1999b). Positive/negative: Finding fun features. Visual Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 14–15.
49.
KobréK. (2008). Photojournalism: The professionals’ approach. Routledge.
50.
KimY. S.ChungD. S. (2017). Anatomy of front pages: Comparison between The New York Times and other US major metropolitan newspapers. International Journal of Communication, 11, 949–966.
51.
KimY. S.KellyJ. D. (2008). A matter of culture: A comparative study of photojournalism in American and Korean newspapers. International Communication Gazette, 70(2), 155–173.
52.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
53.
LautererJ. (2006). Community journalism: Relentlessly local. University of North Carolina Press.
54.
LesterL.CottleS. (2009). Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Communication, 3, 920–936.
55.
LippmannW. (1922). The world outside and the pictures in our heads. In Public opinion ((pp. 1–22). Macmillan.
56.
LiuY. (2013). Professional discourse in winning images: Objectivity and professional boundaries in environmental news images in the World Press Photo contest, 1992–2011. Chinese Journal of Communication, 6(4), 456–481.
57.
LoughK. (2018). Intermedia visual agenda setting: Comparing wire service top photo distribution to what makes the front page. The Agenda Setting Journal, 2(1), 25–40.
58.
LyytimäkiJ. (2014). Bad nature: Newspaper representations of ecosystem disservices. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(3), 418–424.
ManzoK. (2010b). Imaging vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area, 42(1), 96–107.
61.
MeisnerM. S.TakahashiB. (2013). The nature of Time: How the covers of the world’s most widely read weekly news magazine visualize environmental affairs. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(2), 255–276.
62.
MitchellW. J. T. (1994). Landscape and power. University of Chicago Press.
63.
MolotchH.LesterM. (1975). Accidental news: The great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. American Journal of Sociology, 81(2), 235–260.
MorrisD. L.HaughtM. J. (2018). America’s front pages: A 30-year update. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(1), 105–120.
66.
MortensenT. M.GadeP. J. (2018). Does photojournalism matter? News image content and presentation in the Middletown (NY) Times Herald-Record before and after layoffs of the photojournalism staff. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 990–1010.
67.
MullenL. (1998). Close-ups of the president: Photojournalistic distance from 1945 to 1974. Visual Communication Quarterly, 5(2), 4–10.
68.
NewtonJ. (2013). The burden of visual truth: The role of photojournalism in mediating reality. Routledge.
69.
O’NeillS. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum, 49, 10–19.
70.
OravecC. L. (1996). To stand outside oneself: The sublime in the discourse of natural scenery. In CantrillJ. G.OravecC. L. (Eds.), The symbolic earth: Discourse and our creation of the environment (pp. 58–75). University of Kentucky Press.
71.
PedersenP. M.WhisenantW. A. (2003). Examining stereotypical written and photographic reporting on the sports page: An analysis of newspaper coverage of interscholastic athletics. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 12(1), 67–86.
72.
RannikkoP. (1996). Local environmental conflicts and the change in environmental consciousness. Acta Sociologica, 39(1), 57–72.
73.
Rebich-HespanhaS.RiceR. E. (2016). Climate and sustainability| dominant visual frames in climate change news stories: Implications for formative evaluation in climate change campaigns. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4830–4862.
74.
Rebich-HespanhaS.RiceR. E.MontelloD. R.RetzloffS.TienS.HespanhaJ. P. (2015). Image themes and frames in US print news stories about climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 491–519.
75.
ReeseS. D. (2003). Prologue—Framing public life. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.Jr.,GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–31). Routledge.
76.
ReisnerA. E. (1992). The news conference: How daily newspaper editors construct the front page. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900416
77.
RemillardC. (2011). Picturing environmental risk: The Canadian oil sands and the National Geographic. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 127–143.
78.
RiffeD.AustC. F.LacyS. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 133–139.
79.
RiffeD.LacyS.FicoF.WatsonB. (2019). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Routledge.
80.
RyanC. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. South End Press.
81.
SchmidtA.IvanovaA.SchäferM. S. (2013). Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1233–1248.
82.
SchuylerD. (2012). Sanctified landscape: Writers, artists, and the Hudson River Valley, 1820-1909. Cornell University Press.
83.
SeeligM. I. (2016). Communicating the environment beyond photography. Peter Lang.
84.
SeppänenJ. V.VäliverronenE. (2003). Visualizing biodiversity: The role of photographs in environmental discourse. Science as Culture, 12(1), 59–85.
85.
SheppardS. R. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(6), 637–654.
ShoemakerP. J.LeeJ. H.HanG.CohenA. A. (2007) . Proximity and scope as news values. In DevereuxE. (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 231–248). SAGE.
88.
SmithN. W.JoffeH. (2009). Climate change in the British press: The role of the visual. Journal of Risk Research, 12(5), 647–663.
StempelG. H. (1952). Sample size for classifying subject matter in dailies. Journalism Quarterly, 29(3), 333–334.
91.
TaylorC. E.LeeJ. S.DavieW. R. (2000). Local press coverage of environmental conflict. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 175–192.
92.
TichenorP. J.DonohueG. A.OlienC. N. (1980). Community conflict and the press. SAGE.
93.
UribeR.ManzurE. (2012). Research Note: Sample size in content analysis of advertising: The case of Chilean consumer magazines. International Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 907–920.
94.
UttS. H.PasternackS. (1984). Front pages of US daily newspapers. Journalism Quarterly, 61(4), 879–884.
95.
VermaA.van der WalR.FischerA. (2015). Microscope and spectacle: On the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation. Ambio, 44(4), 648–660.
96.
WatsonB. R. (2016). Is Twitter an alternative medium? Comparing Gulf Coast Twitter and newspaper coverage of the 2010 BP oil spill. Communication Research, 43(5), 647–671.
97.
WellsL. (2011). Land matters: Landscape photography, culture and identity. IB Tauris.
